H2H: Looking To Debate? This Is Your One Stop Shop, page 4

H2H: Looking To Debate? This Is Your One Stop Shop, page 4

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times

reply posted on 7-4-2007 @ 08:35 PM by chissler

Allow some time to pass and then we will initiate another one in the not too distant future. I think both members should read through some of the previous H2H Debates, and then look through the debate forum that I know you have a link to, and look at how members have approached the debates in the past. At least 95% of our posts should be our own words, not copy & pastes from other sites. And most importantly, read the rules.

reply posted on 7-4-2007 @ 09:12 PM by Damocles

well, im open to debating explosives used on 911 (i dont think there were any) the 2nd amendment (im very pro gun) or anything dealing with WMD's in general. (i have a "bit" of experience in that field)

i like a good FRIENDLY debate and the only rule i may have issues with is the 24hr to reply thing. due to my health i cant ALWAYS be on my comp but ill try my best.

u2u me and we'll set it up

reply posted on 8-4-2007 @ 03:18 AM by secret titan

Whoa, you have experience in WMD? All I ask is that you stay away from my part of the country.......lol

Sorry, but I've been drinking a little tonight.

reply posted on 8-4-2007 @ 08:33 PM by Damocles

Originally posted by secret titan
Whoa, you have experience in WMD? All I ask is that you stay away from my part of the country.......lol

Sorry, but I've been drinking a little tonight.

not to worry, we already know who you are and where you live. when the time is right someone will be by to pick you up.

/joke

all kidding aside, i was one of the good guys. the short version of what i did was if you recall the news feeds from the anthrax attacks...guys in hazmat suits going in...those guys were on a team like the one i was on. we did wmd terrorism response. we were like the jedi's of the chem/bio corps of the army

reply posted on 8-4-2007 @ 10:58 PM by Justin Oldham

Expert11 and I should begin our debate within the next 24-32 hours. Those of you who want popcorn are advised to get in line now.

reply posted on 9-4-2007 @ 07:23 AM by ImpliedChaos

Question---Do we keep our fighter status after the dabate or only if we win?

reply posted on 9-4-2007 @ 08:27 AM by chissler

Originally posted by ImpliedChaos
Question---Do we keep our fighter status after the dabate or only if we win?

All participants receive the Fighter status. Whether you win or lose, you retain it as well.

reply posted on 9-4-2007 @ 09:13 AM by chissler

Were Explosives Used in 9/11?

Damocles & whatukno are up.

Good Luck!

Attention All Participants

Make sure that you have been awarded the "Fighter" status before you attempt to begin your debate. Anyone who has requested a debate will be awarded the status. It may take a day, so please be patient. If you notice that I have authored your thread but you still do not have the status, just be patient. It will all be taken care of, I assure you.

But if you do not have the "Fighter" status, you will not be able to submit a post to the Head-2-Head Forum.

Just keep that in mind when your ready to do battle.

There has been a slight hold up with some members, but nothing that will not be resolved asap.

[edit on 9-4-2007 by chissler]

reply posted on 9-4-2007 @ 08:26 PM by Damocles

thanks.

well, ideally i wont make a total fool of myself but ive made my opening argument. granted...its hard to convey a lot of information within 10k characters so ill be explaining more of my position as the debate rolls on.

im VERY sure whatukno is goign to keep me on my virtual toes.

this should be fun

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 04:35 AM by Justin Oldham

Okay, folks. The debate over internment camps is under way. Watch and read...if you dare.

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 12:12 PM by chissler

The results have just been announced in the H2H battle between enjoies05 & ImpliedChaos.

Head-2-Head: The Death Penalty

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 12:17 PM by absente

Originally posted by Rockpuck

I will debate on the following topics:

Israel (pro)

I would gladly debate on Israel with Rockpuck, and sharing my pro-palestinian point of view. I hope it's not a problem that i am new, but you can checkout my threads, I am trying always to be objective or prove my point of view with facts.

George

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 12:23 PM by chissler

Originally posted by absente
I would gladly debate on Israel with Rockpuck, and sharing my pro-palestinian point of view.

I've contacted Rockpuck and made him aware of this post. We'll await his reply.

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 12:42 PM by 2l82sk8

Great debate guys-I enjoyed it!

Congratulations to the winner as well! I'd post to you directly on that thread but I don't have fighter status to post in "there."

(And I wont give away the winner here as a spoiler! If you want to know who won people, hit the link read the debate and find out!)

I wanna be a fighter, I wanna be a fighter, I wanna fight!!!

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 12:50 PM by digitalassassin

Originally posted by chissler

Originally posted by ImpliedChaos
Question---Do we keep our fighter status after the dabate or only if we win?

All participants receive the Fighter status. Whether you win or lose, you retain it as well.

I am very interested in having a debate and gaining Fighter status.

Topics:

Iran
Iraq
Does Comedy New count as News.ie...John Stewart, Bill Mahr...I think id does
Movies

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 05:08 PM by chissler

ATTN: Rule Change

In the first few debates, I've noticed a small trend that we should try to curb immediately. For all debates from here on out, a new standard will be implemented. Very benign change, just a small tweak that has our members working harder.

9. Quoting external sources is strictly forbidden. Members are permitted to reference links as sources, but they are not permitted to quote external sources. The only quotes that should be used in these debates are that of their opponent's replies.

General H2H Debate Rules

This means that members can no longer go to sites and copy/paste text from other people, and use this as their ammunition in debates. If you are going to reference something, you may only use the link itself. The text itself must be put into your own words. This is a debate forum, we do not want to see lengthy copy and pastes from other websites.

Can I Quote My Opponent?

YES! Of course you can quote the reply of your opponent in an attempt to refute his or her points. That is perfectly acceptable and almost preferred. But if any member is caught quoting external websites, they will have their reply deleted and risk forfeiture of the debate.

We are all here for a good time, so we will be lenient. Just keep this in the back of your mind. All of the current debates will not have this enforced, as the rules are already binding. But from hereon out, this is the standard.

With that said, allow me to introduce the newest H2H Debate!

Head-2-Head: Palestinian Independence

This standard has been implemented for this debate.

Good Luck!

reply posted on 11-4-2007 @ 08:43 PM by Justin Oldham

Roger that, boss. We are keeping it linky in the debate over internment camps.

reply posted on 15-4-2007 @ 10:32 AM by chissler

Head-2-Head: Murderers, Pedophiles, and Rapists Should Lose their Rights

reply posted on 15-4-2007 @ 10:55 AM by semperfortis

Hey everyone....

I am up for another debate....

Any takers??

Semper

reply posted on 15-4-2007 @ 02:34 PM by enjoies05

Originally posted by chissler

This means that members can no longer go to sites and copy/paste text from other people, and use this as their ammunition in debates. The text itself must be put into your own words. This is a debate forum, we do not want to see lengthy copy and pastes from other websites.

I like this rule Chissler. Thanks.

As soon I as think of more thing's I'd like to debate I'll post it and get another one going.

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >> ^^TOP^^