posted on Dec, 30 2003 @ 03:51 PM
What amazes me is that. The Bible, which many of you "say" you believe devoutly, gives Jesus's description as black but you all still say,
"No, it can't be so!"
Really? Please, which book and verse?
It is conceivable that he would have had more of a middle eastern genetic makeup...but to claim him as black just because of descendants hundreds, to
thousands of years prior, is like saying I'm black for the same reasons....
George Burns was a Black Man?!!!
Of course, after all, he is a descendant of the original tribes of Isreal, right Colonel? After all, if Adam and Eve were to fit the record of
discovered hominids, then we'd ALL be black! And maybe, originally, we were... The point is, over hundreds and thousands of years, people adapt to
their environment. Those that went to colder climes, changed skin tone, hair color, etc.
I guess that's why I always find color arguements so inane.... We're all from the same monkey-men...eons ago...
[Edited on 30-12-2003 by Gazrok]