Greer 'vectoring UFOs'

I was going to post this under the Greer needs a new Publicist thread, but it was going to drag it off topic.

Anyway, does Greer really claim that he can 'vector UFOs'? If so, then why the hell does he even need to bother with his Disclosure Project in any way at all whatsoever???

millerman tried to defend Greer not 'vectoring UFOs' by stating that there might be potential 'security issues' to the UFOs or aliens. Possible energy beam weapons by the MIC, etc...

Greer, you are full of crap with those claims.

If you can 'vector in UFOs' then go away from city limits, to an outback town. Vector in a UFO to hover through the main street with people watching and waving. It won't get shot down over a populated, residental area and it can be recorded by as many phones, cameras and videos as you like. The UFO would not need to land. It would not even need to deploy aliens. Just the presence of a craft that we can not make would be sufficient to show that it has extraterrestrial origin.

By the time the MIC would know the craft is in the main street, the UFO could accelerate away and be gone. Easy done.

Come on, Greer, you made the claim. Do it, you fraud! Oh, by the way, have your publicist there to record witness statements as well.

(I believe in UFOs and aliens. I don't believe that Greer can vector them in. If he can and does, I'll be the first to admit I was wrong.)

What is vectoring?
Im not up on Greers claims at all. Is it like the Billy Meier method?

I'm not sure how or why 'vectoring' is used in the context of describing Steven Greer's exploits, but in aviation 'vectoring' can be used to provide headings to a pilot to steer him in to a location. This is sometimes used in IFR conditions, or if the pilot can't find a runway with both hands and a flash light.

Here is a site with info on Greer: UFOlogy's Own Worst Enemy

EDIT: Added link to article


[edit on 4/2/2007 by Rotoplooker]