Replies:
Hi,
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And have you bothered to read his quote later on about that statement? He was talking about how he was used to seeing big parts of plane left laying
all over the ground, and how he didn't see that at the Pentagon. It's another quote that's taken out of context.
Yes, and the video his here:
9-11-2001 (live) - "There's no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the Pentagon..." (sic)
2006 (staged?) - "For anyone with any common sense and given all the other evidence we have, there's really no doubt that a plane hit the
Pentagon..." (sic)
The 2nd video was after 5 years, he appears to be looking for something or someone every minute (someone is controlling him? maybe looking for a
script?), appearts to be staged and is a contradiction from the firsts video. The first video was live (in real time was happening in that time and is
“as is”), he was spontaneous, and so for me the first one has more credibility. He has change his opinion, but you see his body language in the
2nd video is in a minimum strange, no?
I see nothing out of context in the first video,
do you see anything out of context?
After a question from CNN “central office”, McIntyre “very closed” (sic) replied, the transcript is as follows (part):
"From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
"The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough
that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that
the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
"Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't
until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed."
Also he talks about the multibillion dollar renew of the Pentagon,
with that so much many certainly they have put some CCTV cameras and air strike
security system in the largest building of the world, no?
He also talks about a silver, blue and green paint wreckage part, and I think green don’t belongs to the colors of flight 77.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
And still no reports to match the parts found to flight 77. No reports or photos of where the parts found were taken.
You are right ULTIMA1, a 757 simply does not evaporate!
About your last post, could you give a link for the source of that information on the military testimony?
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Brother: thanks for providing the links to my threads, and for the massive post of up-front video fraud. If I didn't know better I'd say you were
trying to help me out.
Caustic Logic you are welcome, and all the ATS members that discuss in a civilized manner, I respect people with different ideas from mine, and in the
end I think we are trying the same, to find what appended and what is real, and I could be wrong, but for the moment I cant see a 757 in any frame
from any video, but something small is there, could be a car, a van, a missile, a small airplane, etc…, sure something hit the Pentagon but smaller
than a 757 and traveling near the ground.
About the threads is something that I do normally when I found other threads about the same subject I post their link.
On the help, I try to add some value, giving my opinion and some resources I used, and explain my reasoning to achieve my conclusion, but I an way
that could be easily checked and verifiable by other ATS Members, so if I made any mistake someone could tell me (by posting). I remember to post a
photo from Aurora that a Friend later tell me that was a hoax, I was not ware of that, I said thanks, I apology to the thread posters and also sent a
e-mail to the site that originated the faked photo, but unexplained they maintain that faked photo and another from a “faked” UFO.
In your FDR thread I read you telling that you had committed some errors and needed to change something. I don’t see the same approach from some ATS
members, and for me (I am in the other side, I don’t believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon and I think you believe on that) what you have done is
great, you tried your best and now you are improving, so that deserves my respect and any member that proceeds in the same way, and maybe soon (or
later) we could accomplish a good conclusion (far away from hoaxes or frauds) and understand what really append at the Pentagon. I also do mistakes.
More on my way of thinking and behave
here.
Just for the record I don’t belong to any group or movement on the 911! I have expressed my and only my opinion. In the end I could be wrong,
but a plane of that size simply doesn’t disappear from all the frames from the 3 videos we have with the explosion (2 from the Pentagon’s CCTV
cameras and another from the Doubletree Hotel), right?
I just cant see any part of the Boeing 757 in any frame from the videos, so for me and until someone proves the contrary, was not a 757 that
hit the Pentagon but something smaller!
brothethebig.
edit: video link
[edit on 2007/6/11 by brotherthebig]
