It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kilgour
What makes me doubt the official version is all the equipment,money,planning and man power to leave Earth but once on the moon, all to get back is a small LEM.Powered by dodgy thrusters.
Apart from all the photo anomalies and radiation problems,we should of been there for the year 2000.
Think of all the improvements in modern technology we've had since 63.
By now getting to the moon should be as easy as microwaved meals,makes me wonder why we havent set up bases there yet.
[edit on 2-11-2007 by Kilgour]
Russian bloggers has downloaded one of the pictures of the Moon landing from the official NASA website and enhanced it with the means of modern photo imaging software. They have found something that could point on the editing of the image by the primitive methods that were widely used at that time (30 years ago) in many magazines etc.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
And when the landing occurred, it didn't matter what your nationality, the little plaque on the lander said "We came in peace for all mankind." For a little while we all believed that.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by themaster1
Any astronomer or telescope with a laser. The laser is shot through the telescope, hits the reflector and bounces back to the receiver. The number of places that have used them is almost too many to mention.
Apollo 11, 14, and 15 left them all. The first time they were used was August 1969. The first one was placed July 21st, 1969. It was first used about a month later. Two were placed using unmanned probes by the Soviets, but one has never returned any data. All three placed by the Apollo missions continue to function to this day.
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
reply to post by Zaphod58
mirror on moon = men on moon rover on mars = men on mars right?
Originally posted by Badge01
All other expeditions, North Pole, South Pole, Everest, and other far reaches of the globe are required to have INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION of the event before it is deemed worthy and right to be entered into the record books.
Originally posted by Badge01
3. the entire first mission may have been faked (we never left low orbit)
Originally posted by Badge01
5. we have never sent humans through the Van Allen Belt and we never will (until we have better space capsules). We have sent humans to low earth orbit and on one occasion we sent the shuttle higher, but near the beginning of the first Van Allen belt
Originally posted by Badge01
Remember the whole Moon Landing thing was not about exploration or gathering data (such as taking UV pic of the stars, or using an astronomic telescope and special camera to take star pics), it was only about 'landing a man' and jumping around and planting a flag.
Originally posted by Badge01
I heard a documentary back in the 80s that was made in the 70s which said that the chances of missing the docking with the Orbiter was a LOT less than 30% (more like 8%). They said they really got lucky and with some last minute course corrections, Armstrong was able to dock.
Originally posted by Badge01
Look at the press conference after the mission. Three very strange acting guys who appear to be embarrassed by the whole thing, and not proud guys returning from the greatest expedition of all time.
Originally posted by Badge01
Another Factoid. Despite being on the 'high ground' for the first time, the Astronauts, present at the HIGHEST OBSERVTORY in the solar system (at the time) did NOT take any pictures of the stars.
Originally posted by Badge01
MO, going to the Moon and not taking a 'Hubble-like' photo or two of the stars, is like going to the Mauna Kea observatory in Hawaii and never looking up at the stars. It's ludicrous.
Originally posted by SomeGuy34
No one can and or will change my mind, ever.