It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crowpruitt
If they were faked ,what was the need to create the apollo 13 disaster?
Originally posted by coastlinekid
yeah...right...
i86.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by Badge01
Others show, to me, that you just haven't done any research.
For instance you're in here arguing these points, but have you looked at all the 'conspiracy vids' that are freely available on the 'Net?
I doubt it.
So let me challenge you to go look at Google video and watch the vids I posted to JC.
Then come back if you have any more questions.
Maybe you think you don't need to view these 'nutty' videos and you can just go on your 'opinion'. Well, it's nice to have opinions, but even better if they're informed.
Why are you asking me to do your googling for you? You're not one of those people that just because they can't find the answer, make something up that sounds right, are you?
Did you know they lost the plans to the Saturn V? (yep, good old NASA, Land of the Lost).
If someone told you the 'moon rocks' couldn't be faked, would you take that as gospel, or would you look into the characteristics that are used to verify the 'moon rocks', look into CoC, look into the size of the sample of the moon rocks that are sent out.
Did you know they only send out very tiny samples, less than the size of a bouillon cube?
Did you know that NASA has facilities that can precisely duplicate the conditions that exist on the moon, and had done some experiments to try and duplicate the property of the rocks found on the moon?
Did you know that the rocks found in Antarctica are similar to moon rocks, but with a couple notable exceptions?
So don't be one of those posters that hide behind expert opinion and just stand back and snipe at those who are trying to uncover potential deception, while not doing the basic reading and viewing needed to intelligently articulate the discussion, m'kay?
You'll see the American Flag on the dark side of the LEM all light up like a Christmas Tree. How is that possible, given it should be in total shadow? Maybe it was special 'glo-stick' flag material, eh?
Radiation was not an operational problem during the Apollo Program. Doses received by the crewmen of Apollo missions 7 through 17 were small because no major solar-particle events occurred during those missions. One small event was detected by a radiation sensor outside the Apollo 12 spacecraft, but no increase in radiation dose to the crewmen inside the spacecraft was detected. Solar-particle releases are random events, and it is possible that flares, with the accompanying energetic nuclear particles, might hinder future flights beyond the magnetosphere of the Earth.
Radiation protection for the Apollo Program was focused on both the peculiarities of the natural space radiation environment and the increased prevalence of manmade radiation sources on the ground and onboard the spacecraft. Radiation-exposure risks to crewmen were assessed and balanced against mission gain to determine mission constraints. Operational radiation evaluation required specially designed radiation-detection systems onboard the spacecraft in addition to the use of satellite data, solar observatory support, and other liaison. Control and management of radioactive sources and radiation-generating equipment was important in minimizing radiation exposure of ground-support personnel, researchers, and the Apollo flight and backup crewmen.
Originally posted by jra
I haven't looked at all of them, but I've watched a number of them. I've also read through plenty of sites that claim the landings were fake.
Did you know that the Lunites found in Antarctica were found after the Apollo missions? And that they didn't know they were Lunites until they were compared to the Apollo samples? And yes there are some difference between them. Most notably that they have signs of having entered through the atmosphere also lots of weathering and other chemical interactions due to being on Earth for so long. They are fairly easy to tell apart.
You'll see the American Flag on the dark side of the LEM all light up like a Christmas Tree. How is that possible, given it should be in total shadow? Maybe it was special 'glo-stick' flag material, eh?
The surrounding surface not in shadow will reflect light back onto the flag. And in regards to that particular photo, the sunlight is also shining through the fabric.[edit on 8-4-2007 by jra]
Originally posted by Badge01
Please list the one's you've seen.
Wrong. WvB went to Antarctica to collect lunar rocks in 1968, in person.
Wrong. You're talking about the free-standing flag on a pole. I'm talking about the flag that was attached to the side of the LEM.