Before I begin expound on my theories and support for the Vrillon message, I will admit that it is highly difficult to discern the validity of the
audio, regardless of the source.
With that said, let us have a look at the factors involved in the reception of the transmission. First, we have a British transmission system,
through which the message was received. I have seen it pointed out multiple times that it's rather coincidental that Vrillon spoke English, and
British English at that. I would like to point out, in my turn, that we have an exceptionally narrow grasp of communicating with extraterrestrial
species, and thus no precedent cases by which to judge either language or dialect. It's perfectly reasonable to say that perhaps Vrillon tapped into
the first broadcasting station available, mimicked the language and accent he/she/it observed in the ongoing transmissions for clarity's sake, and
moved on with the message.
Also, there is the fact that every single channel being interrupted by the transmission seems completely oblivious to it. That implies that there was
no indication of any transmitter of the United Kingdom area being unlawfully accessed or utilized. Furthermore, it implies that the source was OUTSIDE
of the network, similar to a computer hacker using a device from outside of a country in order to access networks within that country.
Additionally, no one has stepped forward to claim responsibility for this act, nor are there any markers by which to identify assumed perpetrators of
the act. This is markedly strange, as such a deliberate transmission would likely have a very 'important' purpose behind it. There is no point in
committing an act for such a deep-seated cause if you won't claim credit for it. Doubtless the government will manage to 'procure' a culprit, or
obtain supposed evidence of it being a particular person or organization's doing, should too many questions be asked (which is unlikely). However,
the simple fact that no one has VOLUNTARILY stepped forward says right away that perhaps it didn't have Earthly origins. Keep in mind, this was
during a peace-promoting era, when it was a shame to NOT slap your name on a demonstration. Therefore, it is very indicative of a non-human
influence...not to mention the various references to ideas that weren't entirely widespread at that point, as well as a demonstrative technique that
wasn't in great use.
Finally, we must look at technology. According to other threads, no less than five transmitters were hacked in order to deliver this message. At that
day and age (the 70's) who would have the equipment and positioning to access and utilize five separate transmitters? One would be reasonable, two
would be possible but unlikely, three would be stretching it...but FIVE?
All of this comes together to create an increasingly unlikely scenario of human interference with the British broadcasting system. More and more
points to something other than human...but if it wasn't human, what was it?
This is simply my argument for the whole case. If anyone can sufficiently refute this argument, please feel free to do so.