Vrillon of the Ashtar Galactic Command illegal radio broadcast November 26, 1977 *audio*, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 4-6-2007 @ 07:21 PM by Implosion
The YouTube video in the OP seems to be a reconstruction. You can find the actual audio from this event here:

www.ashtarcommand.se...

The Ashtar Galactic Command

The most famous of television broadcasts occurred in England on 26th November, 1977, on Southern ITV (which covered London, the South, and South East). The time was 5.12pm and the message (audio only) interrupted the evening news. Lasting 5½ minutes, it was superimposed over the voice of the newsreader, Ivor Mills. No less than five transmitters were hijacked simultaneously, spread over great distances, and the Independent Broadcasting Authority were not even aware that the message was overriding their signal; as the transmitters would have been switched off immediately. Possibly, this was because the source of the overriding signal was not terrestrial in nature.

The newsreader appeared completely oblivious to the situation and continued as usual, while the voice spoke slowly and calmly, as if echoing through water. The transcript is below.


Source.



This is very strange. I have known about this event for years, and I believe the actual audio posted above to be the original.

en.wikipedia.org...

This would contradict the Wiki entry posted above. Perhaps this is an example of how Wiki is not always a credible source.

I know which one sounds more realistic to me, and it isn't the one contained in the OP.

There are old threads concerning the .mp3 posted above here and here.

Same date, same message, different audio.

I believe the YouTube video may be an example of disinfo. I have had the .mp3 linked above on my hard drive for a couple of years at least. I see the video in the OP was uploaded March 30, 2007. I do not know the source, but it appears to me to have appeared some time after the original was available on the net.

I feel that the Wiki page linked above supports this hypothesis. Someone is trying to make the "Vrillon" recording look credible. I believe the cartoon soundtrack additions are there so as people will pick up on them, choose to believe that this whole story is a hoax, and disregard it.

The name of the speaker in the original version is "GRAMAHA". There is information out there, if you choose to seek it.

[edit on 4/6/07 by Implosion]



reply posted on 28-6-2008 @ 06:06 PM by Anonymous ATS
Have we considered that perhaps the only reason that the signal was so weak and in one place was because it was being sent from so far away? Let's face it; a radio signal is just a collection of waves. If they were even able to pinpoint ONE of our radio stations from anything more than 10,000 miles away, they may be more advanced than we can even hope of understanding. We all may be misunderstanding here. They're not going to bask Earth in radiowaves and disrupt everything, they're going to send a specific signal.

Now, this is speculation on my part. I'm actually with the skeptics. The skeptic is an extremely valuable character in the acquisition of fact and knowledge through-out history. But one thing that every skeptic needs to realize is...we all thought Copernicus was a nutbag when he said the Earth revolved around the Sun...we, the skeptics thought this. He was just a poor crazy man and his idea disappeared for hundreds of years after he suggested it. If something like this comes, no credit is taken by anyone, the BBC itself has no idea what happened, and there is nothing specifically unreasonable or unrealistic about the message received, what do we lose from entertaining the idea of its truthfulness?

I'll say this...unlike any phenomenon on Earth, aliens are thought about and 'encountered' all over the Earth. And I'll be honest, it's been pretty consistent.

Now don't get me wrong, I won't fall victim to the logical fallacy of Appeal to the People. Just because a lot of people believe it, does not mean it's true. But let's not equally perform an Appeal to the People by assuming that because science has not encountered aliens that they are not feasible.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 07:20 PM by BASSPLYR
it's an obvious hoax because the "alien" wants us to back away from learning about nuclear energy and how sub atomic science works. yeah right an alien would tell us to cease and desist in learning about one of the key stepping stones for any species and civilization attempting to evolve into something more advanced.

No alien would call nuclear science evil. thats a hippy talking not an alien. The message really doesn't even make sense if you think about it.

Personally as for me I say screw the ashtar command. I envision humans colonizing other planets Starship Trooper style. Bow down before the great and almighty humans. you aliens may have been around the galaxy but you haven't seen nothing until you get a load of human virtuosity. Ever think if an alien did say something as dumb as this ashtar leader it would be to stop us from arming ourselves so that we would be vulnerable to their technology? I say we keep building nukes and point them at the aliens. try that line of BS one more time and we vaporize your armada.

And we should build enough nukes to make the planet from the surface to the deepest caves uninhabitable for a million years. in the event that they do land and succeed in invading our homeworld. if we can't have it than neither will they. bring it on ashtar dweebs and get a load of humanity. were real, were out there and we are coming to your planet next. Gunna teach you about whos the better species and give you a lesson in survival of the fitest and human manifest destiny. your alien existence is but speed bump in our destiny to rule the galaxy. maybe that is the destiny the aliens are so afraid we will manifest. well too bad, were coming for that ass you pelaidians and reticulans.


reply posted on 7-11-2010 @ 09:44 PM by FireMoon
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I was there for this one and in this thread try to give some background to it all. One point i will reiterate here is this. What had many totally baffled was how the message managed to blank out not one but two transmitters but only in a very specific area. We were watching LWT not Southern TV and we *saw* it. I'd further make the observation the area of the broadcast covered roughly 18-20% of England's total population.


reply posted on 7-11-2010 @ 09:53 PM by wesufmcosmic
reply to post by FireMoon



Also according to something I was told the transmission was also heard in the Alton Barnes area of the England .

Where the first Crop Circles appeared .


reply posted on 7-11-2010 @ 10:14 PM by snusfanatic
reply to post by Acharya



well the kings english is 'purest' in one sense but as far as accents go, i'd assume a flat, no accent voice closer to how people in california talk. more flat and pure sound wise and more generic.


reply posted on 6-1-2012 @ 12:00 PM by Starchild23
Before I begin expound on my theories and support for the Vrillon message, I will admit that it is highly difficult to discern the validity of the audio, regardless of the source.

With that said, let us have a look at the factors involved in the reception of the transmission. First, we have a British transmission system, through which the message was received. I have seen it pointed out multiple times that it's rather coincidental that Vrillon spoke English, and British English at that. I would like to point out, in my turn, that we have an exceptionally narrow grasp of communicating with extraterrestrial species, and thus no precedent cases by which to judge either language or dialect. It's perfectly reasonable to say that perhaps Vrillon tapped into the first broadcasting station available, mimicked the language and accent he/she/it observed in the ongoing transmissions for clarity's sake, and moved on with the message.

Also, there is the fact that every single channel being interrupted by the transmission seems completely oblivious to it. That implies that there was no indication of any transmitter of the United Kingdom area being unlawfully accessed or utilized. Furthermore, it implies that the source was OUTSIDE of the network, similar to a computer hacker using a device from outside of a country in order to access networks within that country.

Additionally, no one has stepped forward to claim responsibility for this act, nor are there any markers by which to identify assumed perpetrators of the act. This is markedly strange, as such a deliberate transmission would likely have a very 'important' purpose behind it. There is no point in committing an act for such a deep-seated cause if you won't claim credit for it. Doubtless the government will manage to 'procure' a culprit, or obtain supposed evidence of it being a particular person or organization's doing, should too many questions be asked (which is unlikely). However, the simple fact that no one has VOLUNTARILY stepped forward says right away that perhaps it didn't have Earthly origins. Keep in mind, this was during a peace-promoting era, when it was a shame to NOT slap your name on a demonstration. Therefore, it is very indicative of a non-human influence...not to mention the various references to ideas that weren't entirely widespread at that point, as well as a demonstrative technique that wasn't in great use.

Finally, we must look at technology. According to other threads, no less than five transmitters were hacked in order to deliver this message. At that day and age (the 70's) who would have the equipment and positioning to access and utilize five separate transmitters? One would be reasonable, two would be possible but unlikely, three would be stretching it...but FIVE?

All of this comes together to create an increasingly unlikely scenario of human interference with the British broadcasting system. More and more points to something other than human...but if it wasn't human, what was it?

This is simply my argument for the whole case. If anyone can sufficiently refute this argument, please feel free to do so.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 23 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 10 hours ago, 89 replies
Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 12 hours ago, 70 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 58 replies
Iran sent pink drone to Obama
  World War Three, Posted 17 hours ago, 40 replies