One of the first things I do when presented with new "research" is check up on the author. It appears that RedDragon, and Byrd have both done the
same.
My checkup also shows that there are questions, and historical problems with this authors research methods.
For example: If you present your research in a Court of Law, your information and methodology will be scrutinized for validity by various authorities
in the field. No shenanigans allowed.
That is exactly what the author of this "Research" did, (but shouldn't have). After being examined by authorities, and the Court of Law, the
research methodology was deemed "unreliable".
This is not to be taken lightly. That one court opinion permanantly stains the reputation of Dr. Hildegarde Staninger, and indicates that no research
by this person should never be taken at face value.
A close look at multiple chemical sensitivity (PDF).
Benney v. Shaw Industries, Inc.
The court excluded the opinion of Dr. Hildegarde Staninger ~ as the methodology was unreliable.
Still, one cannot exempt this current research based on 1 court opinion, and the website its on. However, both together does raise questions about the
current work.
In light of this it follows that this new reseach should be sent to highly respected authorities in the field with a request to investigate this work
in an unbiased effort to prove or disprove this report for purposes of validation.
One other red flag I found about Dr. Hildegarde Staninger is the title, Dr. of Integrative medicine. Why is that a red flag? Perhaps a quote from
the
Skeptic's Dictionary will help you understand.
Integrative Medicine is a synonym for "alternative" medicine that integrates sense with nonsense. It integrates the scientific with the
untested and the discredited.
I'm not trying to discredit the report, Morgellens, or the good Dr's work. I'm simply pointing out that there is quite a bit of easily accessible
information that gives any reasonable person a good reason to view the work sceptically, until validated via other, more reliable means and
methodologies.
Also, don't expect big Pharma to touch it as there is likely no
money to be made from it. 
