Morgellon's Identified!!!, page 10

quote [/My opinion (and that is all it is) is that this affliction termed Morgellon's will in time be found to be of a fungicidal and parasitic pathology. It has nothing whatsoever to do with nanotechnology or NWO, or even chemtrails. It is not a man-made affliction!]
I am a sufferer of what is now being called the "silent superbug" and wanted to let you know I agree with you on several points . First, that it is fungal and parasitic in nature, absolutely! In addition to these I would add bacterial, for the presence of a biofilm, [an artificial skin like "platform"made from bacterial secretions, bacteria such as staph and strep to name just a couple use this barrier for protection from injury and detection] Second, I too have difficulty with the nanotechnology approach, the name morgellon's, was taken from an account of a similar affliction, something like 300 years ago!
Your suggestion of the immune system's inability to recognize the enemy Is very interesting as I too have pondered the idea of a parasite capable of disguising its own DNA to avoid detection or even a form of mind control similar to what fluke parasites do to snails, in order to complete their life cycle. I believe, very specific conditions have to be met , for someone to contract it,but sadly if we continue on this dangerous, poisonous, path we will see many more case, and maybe worse dis eases.

Originally posted by elysiumfire
Hi There,

I wanted to make a second post on this subject, and for my own part would like to state a stance culled from a short preliminary (passive) internet research session. My opinion (and that is all it is) is that this affliction termed Morgellons will in time be found to be of a fungicidal and parasitic pathology. It has nothing whatsoever to do with nanotechnology or NWO, or even chemtrails. It is not a man-made affliction!

What follows now is simply an extended conjectural concept based on what is currently and factually known.

All affected persons will exhibit a common denominator in their presentation of being a 'host' to the affliction. Some weakening in their immune system, or their immune system's inability to recognise the invasionary presence of the organism?

The Morgellons-causing organism will be trasmissable through physical contact only, and although a family member may show signs of the organism's presence, it will not necessarily correllate that other family members will definitely go on to produce the same symptoms? There is something about the limited prevalance (in terms of population ratio) of this affliction that suggests it to be a organism of selective opportunity, and that this will probably be determined by genetic makeup of the host? It is probable that some carriers will never display or suffer the symptoms, but may still transmit the organism?

The creepy-crawly sensation might well be due to the unfoldment (uncoiling) and breakout through to the skin's surface of 'ariel hyphae' (ie, the fibres), the presentation of which during a doctor's interview will be met with the usual diagnosis of 'delusional parasitosis'?

It would be interesting to see x-rays of severe or advanced cases, which might show distinct separate spore centres rootly interconnected to each other?

Eradication of the affliction will more than likely rest upon interfering/interposing on the ability of the organism to both feed and reproduce, and will not depend upon the body's immune defence systems? Correct identification on the spore's required main nutrient, and the means by which to deny it, should aid towards a rapid dissolution and recovery? I also feel that temperature lowering should