posted on Nov, 23 2002 @ 03:25 AM
It's a terribly vague article, Thomas, and you do appear to have missed out the word "eventually" when you used the opening line as the
We see it could be "several", it could be "two or more", it could be "six years" ahead.
It does make the Dems and Clinton look rather silly in 1994 when the PRK reactor-issue was broached.
Other than that, I can't see why it was printed.
It doesn't really do much for the current administration. Although America had no choice but to posture and prevaricate when Pyongyang coolly
announced it had nuclear capability: (unlike - to pick a name at random - Saddam Hussein who continually announces the opposite), the USA was
diplomatically outmanoeuvred there and was left with no little egg on its face.
I'll be interested to see if this "story" is folowed up, at all.