posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 01:34 AM
Can anyone with a stronger scientific understanding than myself make sense of these studies?
I must admit, I'm a little surprised that Morgellons doesn't get more of a mention on these boards. I've looked through some of the previous
threads, and I know that the credibility and qualifications of Dr. Hildegarde Staninger have been questioned before with regards to Morgellons. I
guess I'm hoping someone with scientific background can 'layman-ise' the scientific findings of the lab.
Yes, yes, I know it's from Rense and 'OMG they have ads for genuine Element 115 on their page so this must all be fake'. I'd really appreciate if
someone with an open mind could ignore the source for a moment to address purely the science in these studies.
In short - I don't understand the science, and clearly the people responsible for the studies are biased in favour of Morgellons. I would imagine any
of our scientific skeptics are probably biased against Morgellons, but if I can get both extrapolations from the same data-set, then maybe I can reach
my own conclusion despite being a scientific dunce
[edit on 30-3-2007 by TheStev]