posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 09:42 PM
while I dont think Hicks was a rag tag militia man in the Taliban,
there is that question
'' Just what was he doing, in Afghan, with the Taliban? '
Front page today says he's pleaded, and he's getting 7yrs.
Is that 7 minus the 5 served? or 12, minus the 5 served?
I think its very, very handy that this has all wound its self up 'so' quickly with the upcoming elections.
Im just waiting for that claim of success from Howard
'' Due to our support in the WOT, and in Iraq, we have been able to secure a deal over Hicks to get him home ''
Hicks pleaded guilty, and declared that the Prosecution CAN prove without a doubt he was guilty.
If this was true, why couldnt he be tried, from the begining ?
Seems forced confessions/plea's are the fad at the moment..
Just how do you prove beyond a doubt, that he was part of the taliban?