John Titor fraud or not?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 19-7-2008 @ 06:09 PM by re22666
Originally posted by imitator
Originally posted by re22666
i do not want to seem rude but stop. you are losing it completely and double talking just for a second.


re22666, I admire your slanting thoughts. If it seems I'm rantting then I appologize.

Originally posted by re22666
if each destination creates a NEW world line. then how can you ever travel BACK to an old one. the trip in and of itself is taking you somewhere new within your new timeline to a place that does not exsist until you get there. so how...please tell me how then. do you go back to where you came from based on that line of thinking.


Well since you didn't understand my scripting or view point, then Gosub lol. Just kidding, I do find it interesting Titor used it as an example.

Look at it this way, if you believe you can never return BACK to an old worldline, then what is the point of leaving, right. John's unit wouldn't send a man off if they knew he wouldn't return.

I would bet in 2036 those scientist knew of a way back, they know there is infinite number of worldlines that could bring Titor back to them, they know it's possible that Titor could make spacetime trips on his own worldline, they know of several scenarios that could bring John Titor back to them on their worldline. In fact John mentions this kind of stuff. When he returns, his worldline will never be the same of those he left, even though he returned back to point A.


[edit on 18-7-2008 by imitator]


an intelligent well spoken response that actually replies to what i wrote!!!! wow! you are my new favorite person on ATS. but i think you missed how i opened this all up.

my original question was in fact, what would be the point. why would they send him, why would he go. there is no benefit for anyone so what is the point of the trip. he mentions he can go back, he says he knows how. but then he also explains the mechanism of time travel. they contradict. if anything he says is true up to and including his posts here at ATS. then based solely on john titors explanation of how time travel works. he can say there is a way back all he wants, it does not fit into his explanation. that is all i am getting at.
i have everything he gave us for evidence plus things that are debated as being valid titor evidence. i listened to all the coast to coasts with him, about him, whatever. when he says he can go back, he never says how. he answers with speudoscience at best but no matter how vague or detailed, any return trip is negated by HIS own explanation of how he got here. see what i am saying? i know i sound angry when i type, and i am argumentative as all get out once i get done reading about 5 other threads here but i really like your response and i dont reply to just "shoot you down." anyone that can either make me think or respectfully explain why they disagree, makes coming here worth it.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



May 20, 2012, The Great Earthquake may actually happen
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags
May 20th, a NEW PERSPECTIVE at the EARTHQUAKE
  Posted 16 days ago with 10 member flags
Have the Locusts of the Apocalypse been found?
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
Merkel and Monti Revive Old Berlin-Rome Axis
  Posted 18 days ago with 5 member flags
A vision of Jesus and aliens
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags
Dec 23, 2012 marks the date for another major disaster event.
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags