This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Chinese spy goes on trial in LA




Topic started on 28-3-2007 @ 02:23 AM by the_sentinal


Chinese
spy goes on trial in LA


www.washtimes.com

China's efforts to use spying to gain U.S. military technology will get a close look during the trial of a Chinese-born defense contractor set to begin today near Los Angeles.
Chi Mak, an electrical engineer who worked on some of the U.S. Navy's most sensitive high-tech weapons, goes on trial in a federal court in Santa Ana, Calif., on charges of conspiracy to export U.S. defense secrets to China, possession of property in aid of a foreign government and failure to register as a foreign agent.
Federal law-enforcement and counterintelligence officials said the case against Mr. Mak and four others is one of the most significant Chinese intelligence-gathering cases in recent years after a string of failed China-spying cases. The FBI has come under fire for mishandling the 1999 case of Los Alamos nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee, and the 2003 case of Los Angeles businesswoman Katrina Leung, who officials say spied for China while posing as an FBI informant.
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 28-3-2007 by the_sentinal]

[edit on 28-3-2007 by the_sentinal]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 02:23 AM by the_sentinal


For all of those who insist that china is our friend, this should serve as a wake up call that their intentions are not simply an economic friendship with the U.S. They should barbecue this guy and send China a message that were through playing around with them.

www.washtimes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 03:47 AM by SportyMB


This doesn't surprise me, the Chinese are known for being very aggressive with intelligence gathering. Often they'll have 2 or more means of collecting the same info they're looking for (ie: 2 unrelated persons going after the same source) and it's not uncommon for them to assign intelligence officers to the most unlikely sources of information (people in low positions, etc...). I guess with 1 billion+ people you can spare a few to go after targets that most FIAs wouldn't even look at.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 



























ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.066 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread