It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cascades - Disturbing Activity at St Helens & Rainier!!

page: 16
2
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2005 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Hey, something just happened on MSH. It has been picked up by the south ridge webicorder

south ridge

and the june lake webicorder

june lake

and cedar flats

cedar flats


[edit on 1-19-2005 by Valhall]




posted on Jan, 19 2005 @ 12:25 PM
link   
I think it just burped!

www.fs.fed.us...

I'm going to capture the current pic of the webicam above...it has a smoke plume.



posted on Jan, 19 2005 @ 12:30 PM
link   
First one is at 10:14:30

second at 10:19:30






posted on Jan, 19 2005 @ 12:45 PM
link   
it is definitely smoking on and off today -- right now there is even a better plume going...

jm



posted on Jan, 19 2005 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Possibly a large rock slide/the new dome cracking some.. would produce more steam and those sorts of patterns on the seismos..

Osiris



posted on Jan, 23 2005 @ 05:26 AM
link   
15 quakes mag 1.0-2.0 have occurred in the past 24 hours at MSH.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

It's heartbeat seems to quickening as well.

www.pnsn.org...



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 05:10 AM
link   
MSH is definitely getting more active again. The frequency of the rumblings is a lot higher and the magnitude is going up as well.

www.pnsn.org...



posted on Jan, 26 2005 @ 09:47 AM
link   
The new dome webi went off line about 9 hours ago or so.

www.pnsn.org...

www.pnsn.org...



posted on Jan, 29 2005 @ 01:29 PM
link   
I think the new dome webicorder just went offline again, but I don't know what all the weird activity right before means.

MSH New Dome



posted on Jan, 29 2005 @ 04:19 PM
link   
Probably another steam/ash venting..

You really would think they would harden those things to make them a little sturdier.

Osiris



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 04:51 AM
link   
What do you guys make of these two Rainier webicordings???

www.pnsn.org...

www.pnsn.org...



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 05:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
What do you guys make of these two Rainier webicordings???

www.pnsn.org...

www.pnsn.org...

He´s clearing his throat again...

RUN AWAY!!



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 05:07 AM
link   
How can Muir be almost clear while Shurman is all whacked out? Shouldn't they be sympathetic to each other during a seismic event, given that they're only a few miles apart? In other words, if this were a real event, wouldn't it be showing up on both?

I think readings like this are usually explained as equipment error or wind, right?



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 05:09 AM
link   
I'm thinking it might be wind, as well. Concerning whether all webicorders on a volcano will show the same event - these are small motion sensors, so, no, not necessarily. If one webicorder is in range to pick up, say, rock cracking beneath due to magmatic encroachment, another at a sizable distance away may not.



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 06:36 AM
link   
So this is normal?
www.pnsn.org...

If I'm understanding the situation correctly, normal background levels at yellowstone now exceed 'disturbing' levels elsewhere.

How many centimetres has the ground surged this morning?


Edited because I forgot my link..doh!


[edit on 8-2-2005 by WyrdeOne]



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 08:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by WyrdeOne
So this is normal?
www.pnsn.org...

If I'm understanding the situation correctly, normal background levels at yellowstone now exceed 'disturbing' levels elsewhere

[edit on 8-2-2005 by WyrdeOne]



I'm sure your fingers just typed yellowstone as your brain was thinking yellow rock (I know mine have done things like that) but figured I would point it out so no one gets confused.

jm



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 08:25 AM
link   
I thought Yellow Rock was a site in Yellowstone Park?


If I'm mistaken, thank you for correcting me. I said Yellowstone because I was under the impression that Yellow Rock was a monitoring station encompassed by the larger region 'Yellowstone.'



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 03:54 PM
link   
It's my understanding that Yellow Rock monitor is just one of the many stations on Mt. St. Helens - like the Dome monitor or South Ridge monitor. We've all had times when we have made similar mistakes -- at least I know I have


jm



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 04:02 PM
link   
I apoligize for the misinformation.

justme
Thank you very much for bringing it to my attention, alerting me to pull up my proverbial pants before the whole board saw my package. And so nicely too, you didn't use the word idiot or 'noob' once.




[edit on 8-2-2005 by WyrdeOne]



posted on Feb, 8 2005 @ 07:21 PM
link   
Woa...check this out.

www.komotv.com...



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join