Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Cascades - Disturbing Activity at St Helens & Rainier!!

page: 1
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Hey, 6 quakes in the past week around St. Helens, that's not normal.



And look what JUST happened!

www.ess.washington.edu...


[edit on 9-30-2004 by Valhall]

[edit on 9-11-2004 by John bull 1]




posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:36 AM
link   
Sig repeated on the south-ridge recorder as well!

www.ess.washington.edu...

You guys this is about a 2.0 I'm guessing.

AND, there was a smaller one (less than 1.0) about 12:18 UTC this morning.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:36 AM
link   
oooh... now thats alot of shaking we've got going.

Before the Mt St Helens eruption were there earthquakes like this? I remember a show on discovery about how it was ready to blow again as a cap had formed over the lava.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:37 AM
link   
Holy #, guys. Mt. Rainer even picked this one. This is bigger than 2.0.

And now, I'm concerned as to whether it was St. Helens or Rainier!!!

www.ess.washington.edu...



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:41 AM
link   
I think this is our culprit

MAP 4.2 2003/12/27 15:23:22 43.622 -127.153 50.0 228 km (142 mi) WNW of Bandon, OR



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:42 AM
link   
Hrmm, i'll check the Live internet seismic servers...

aslwww.cr.usgs.gov...

Whole lotta jiggling going on, it seems like the whole damn world is shaking.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:43 AM
link   
You remember what i said in the u2u about HAARP?

I still think they're faking readings, its been uber quiet for the past week. They normally hide things when they're upto something because most of the time the transmissions are as bold as can be.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:46 AM
link   
I'd like to explain what just happened with this thread...lol.

I have spent the past hour reviewing webicorders in the cascades and then trying to match events back to the USGS and NEIC. I reviewed a lot of seismic activity stats on Mt. St. Helens and found that the six events under St. Helens in the past week is WAY WAY more than usual. So I started making the post for this thread and wanted to also include the link to the Dome Station webicorder to show that another event had happend at about 12:15 UTC today, that would make 7 in a week! When I brought up the webicorder the 4.2 Oregon quake was on it and it made me # my pants!!!

Didn't intend to have non St. Helens quake info here...it was just a very scary instance of synchronicity!



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Okay, guys, I don't think these events on Mt. St. Helens and Rainier are the 4.2 off Oregon coast.

There is still # happening on these webicorders. And these events are not showing up on webicorders on other Cascade peaks.

This is something else, I'm afraid.


St. Helens Dome Station webicorder:

www.ess.washington.edu...



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:54 AM
link   
Whats the effect of earthquakes on a volcano and were there any recorded when mt St helens blew. Hrmm, i wonder what these could be a precursor to.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 09:58 AM
link   
Nerdling,

Here is the St. Helens seismicity page. It has very good historical data concerning the pre and post eruption periods.

www.geophys.washington.edu...



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nerdling
They normally hide things when they're upto something because most of the time the transmissions are as bold as can be.


Isn't that just ignoring evidence that doesn't fit your theory? There were earthquakes for a long time before HAARP came around.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:03 AM
link   
DATE-(UTC)-TIME LAT(N) LON(W) DEP MAG QUAL COMMENTS
yy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss deg. deg. km Ml
03/11/16 12:03:06 46.20N 122.18W 2.0 1.2 AA
03/11/16 12:42:47 46.20N 122.18W 2.0 0.1 AA
03/11/21 00:05:59 46.20N 122.18W 1.8-0.6 AA
03/11/22 13:55:52 46.20N 122.18W 0.1-0.2 AA
03/11/22 19:46:15 46.20N 122.18W 2.2 0.8 AA
03/11/25 07:11:48 46.20N 122.18W 1.7 0.1 AA
03/11/27 18:25:47 46.20N 122.18W 2.1 0.2 AB
03/11/30 15:14:55 46.19N 122.18W 2.1 0.1 AB
03/12/03 00:59:25 46.20N 122.19W 2.3-0.2 AB
03/12/04 21:52:49 46.20N 122.18W 1.9 1.2 AA
03/12/08 03:07:34 46.20N 122.17W 4.3-0.4 BB
03/12/14 12:49:15 46.20N 122.18W 0.5-0.6 AB
03/12/20 16:34:07 46.20N 122.19W 2.0-0.2 AB
03/12/22 09:40:15 46.20N 122.18W 1.8-0.1 AA
03/12/22 12:21:45 46.20N 122.18W 2.0-0.8 AB
03/12/22 21:19:18 46.20N 122.18W 1.9 1.4 AA
03/12/23 10:58:43 46.20N 122.18W 1.9-0.5 AA
03/12/23 22:40:36 46.19N 122.18W 2.4-0.5 AB
03/12/24 01:52:26 46.20N 122.18W 2.0 1.8 AA
03/12/26 12:12:48 46.20N 122.18W 1.9-0.6 AA


Thats the recorded data on the site... hrmm.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kano

Originally posted by Nerdling
They normally hide things when they're upto something because most of the time the transmissions are as bold as can be.


Isn't that just ignoring evidence that doesn't fit your theory? There were earthquakes for a long time before HAARP came around.


Yes i know that Kano, however, when earthquakes like these happen under funny circumstances, haarp is always silent, i think you'll find they were caught faking readings too if you go back through the WWSE thread, with screenshot evidence to match.



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:11 AM
link   
Maybe one of those?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

and btw. small earthquake happen all the time. About 2000 a day, just read that somewhere yesterday. So as long as there are no news around it is false alarm. Or somebody smelling conspiracies again?



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by shoo
Maybe one of those?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

and btw. small earthquake happen all the time. About 2000 a day, just read that somewhere yesterday. So as long as there are no news around it is false alarm. Or

Well, actually, it appears that if there are "2000 quakes a day" under St. Helens, they must be < .5 mag, because as you can see in Nerdling's post above, .5 and up is recorded.

The first event may very well have been the 4.2 off the Oregon coast, but as I said before I spent an hour checking CA events against recordings on St. Helens' webicorder and they don't show up...so the second was is not the 3.5 (the times don't match either) - the second event in the Cascades was at about 15:45 UTC. The 3.5 was at 16:00 UTC.

As for conspiracy, I don't know what you're talking about. This thread is about concerning webicorder tracks on St. Helens...how can that be a conspiracy???



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:16 AM
link   
You guys think this could have anything to do with the nasty quake in Iran? It was pretty strong...or maybe we should be hunkering down for a global quake soon?



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:18 AM
link   
I tell you what Jetshadow. That 6.5 in CA seems to be what has started some kind of weird global seismic event.

Check out the past week of posts on the World Wide Seismic Event thread. Seems things have gotten weird everywhere since that one.

And CA is REALLY shaking - my last post in the WWS thread shows that in San Simeon, CA for the past week there have been 1100 earthquakes!

It could have initiated something in the Cascades!



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
The 3.5 was at 16:00 UTC.tracks on St. Helens...how can that be a conspiracy???


With conspiracy I was reffering to the HAARP topic. You know? Everything that happens and doesn't seems to be logic is a conspiracy
and of course most of those come from the USA


PS: Not denying there is maybe something going on - geologically.

[Edited on 27-12-2003 by shoo]



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall
It could have initiated something in the Cascades!


Initiated what what with the who who?

Your a student of eschatology val, isnt there something about a major earthquake before the end time?





new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join