Pretty much yeah.
The actual diversion is nothing new. It's standard in the propaganda model, which it's purpose has historically been to distract us from American
Imperialism (which is the source of our poverty, and thus "social deviance"(crime, drugs, etc)).
The modern US propaganda model is mostly the science of persuasion and diversion. Fear is the most effective utilizer of each. UFO's, assuming the
'logical' view of them not existng or being "present" here, have been used for many decades to scare the population while diverting them from
understanding the military's technologies/mind control projects/etc. The other line of diversion is distracting the alarmist/paranoid/etc types into
the alien/ufo realm, thus keeping them from looking into the real terrestrial issues that might need attention. That leaves the rest all busy
worshipping whatever imperialist they "voted" for, or their MTV.
All of that combined with an external 'us vs them' enemy keeps the justification handy when things cant be kept from the news. Usually the overt
wars are impossible to keep from the news so naturally they try to avoid them.
After the collapse of the USSR it was awful funny how this new Islamic threat appeared. Real convenient, tho at least with this view we can understand
why there are "terrorists" in the first place. After 911, the terrorist concept obviously turned into official preemptive strike (imperialist)
doctrine. But American Imperialism is nothing new, it's just taken on a new face. This served 2 purposes: catalyze the public into supporting war,
and then a 'circumstantional' benefit came in thsi concext that I'm showing as people who werent even alarmists/etc before are now sucked into 911.
It striking how virtually every single aspect of 911 can be debated for, well, another 40 years. But back on pont, everyone is either distracted from
or rather have another self-excuse to pretend that we're not an empire, or they're sucked into 911 and are too bust figuring out what happened to
fingure out what's going to happen next, especially somehting that's unprecidented while vastly different than 911.
The other diversions were already in place. It's likely that 'news' in issues like ufo's has probably 'increased' since 911.
So then we get to what I'm really talking about... It's certainly the mechanism for ensured permanent global domination. It could be a simple mix of
'mad' futurist scientists getting the funding they want ... from simple greedy imperialist bureucrats. The imperialists want their power so bad
they're laying down the future of humanity on the table by rushing to build this all powerful system. Or it can go a touch deeper into it being a
total religious thing, which solid arguments for that can be made. Probably a combinaton of all of the above.
With the robots I see a vast potential for us to be controlled by them, but i think that the 'best opiton' for "them" would be for us humans to
become the 'robots'. Ths would seem more cost effective than building a billion robots, and we have to "be fed" already anyways.
But yes, everything possible network. The collective.
EMPs' I suppose. But that's mostly an after the fact sort of remedy. With this system, after the fact is too late. Like a dog trying to chew his way
out of a titanium cage.
We need a sor tof starting point. It's really little different than the many other forms of social movement. Only this tiem the stakes are higher,
but at least verifiabe and apply to everyone.
1) We need to pretend that we can make a change, instead of pretend that we cant. Even if you're a Christian, it being a "sign" doesnt mean you do
nothing and live life with contempt assuming that Jesus is going to come back in 30 minutes. Even if he is, we dont know it so it's safe to say that
we should life our lives reisting tyranny and so on I have to mention this because too many Christians end up down the copout path.
2) We need an across the board truth movement, nut just 911.
[edit on 27-3-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]