 |
|
Topic started on 24-3-2007 @ 05:03 PM by misterfantastic
|
Dubai already has a truly stunning landscape, every space conceivable taken up my massive and beautifull buildings.
A new tower is planned for Jumeirah Village South in Dubai. The
Dh175million Rotating tower features 72 residential units in total including four rotating penthouses and a rotating villa with its own car lift.
Five of the tower’s 15 storeys will rotate through 360 degrees at speeds which can be selected by the resident once in either three, six, 12 or 24
hours.
www.bornrich.org...
I think that is an amazing and unique idea. what do you guys think about a rotating tower?!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 05:13 PM by djohnsto77
|
I think that's awesome.
A different view outside your window whenever you look!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 05:17 PM by misterfantastic
|
I should warn you, if you plan to check this tower out in the future,
BOOK IN ADVANCE, appearently people are already scrambling for space in the tower.
[edit on 24-3-2007 by misterfantastic]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-3-2007 @ 08:58 PM by DragonsDemesne
|
I think I've seen that somewhere before. In any event, a rotating tower is really cool. There is one locally called "The Revolving Restaurant",
which is at the top floor of a tall building, and just the top floor rotates. It rotates once maybe every hour or two, the idea being that you go
through roughly 360 degrees during your meal.
This sounds much more impressive, since there will be multiple rotating floors, and rotating at different speeds, so that they will need a set of
controls and equipment for each floor that rotates.
Dubai is one of the richest cities in the world. They can afford to do cool stuff like this as a matter of course.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:03 AM by misterfantastic
|
we even have a tower that kinda rotates in our city, well, the floor rotates inside the building so you can walk around the edge faster i guess.
but different floors rotating would be sweet.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:08 AM by untilted
|
they build another multi-billion skyscraper, but in the same time:
image source: http://missions.blogsome.com/images/hunger.jpg
yeah, that's cool!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:12 AM by misterfantastic
|
actually it costs 500 million us. so not even a billion, and there is another thread for pictures like that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:16 AM by timeless test
|
I find myself broadly with Untilted on this one.
I know there will always be "haves" and "have nots" in the world no matter how hard we try to eradicate poverty but amusing at it may sound this
project is just plain gross.
I can't help feeling that history will look back on a small Arab state with many of its residents scratching for a living whilst others enjoy this
sort of privilege as being really rather unpleasant.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:20 AM by untilted
|
Originally posted by timeless test
I can't help feeling that history will look back on a small Arab state with many of its residents scratching for a living whilst others enjoy this
sort of privilege as being really rather unpleasant.

exactly, but hey, lets celebrate the new fancy skyscraper... who cares if people die from hunger as a result...
that is for another thread, ain't it?...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 10:40 AM by Harlowe JNkinz
|
I think the OP was going for the "Oooh, that's freakin' sweet" factor... not interested in the political side...
I mean c'mon... do you refrain from upgrading your computer or buying a great television to feed the homeless guy on the corner? ... the fact that
you HAVE a computer would suggest that you opted to help yourself to something nice instead of giving up your hard-earned money for the drunk at the
curb...
Yeah, the kids that die - we all feel sorry for them... but the fact is - we do what WE want with our money - do you send your 78 cents per day to
help that old guy feed kids in poor countries? I know I don't... even though I feel like I SHOULD... and if I were Bill Gates rich, I would give
craploads away (as he and his wife do)... but that doesn't mean I can't build myself a crazy expensive compound to call home!
{Edit to Add:}
Anyhoo... back on topic...
That's a freakin' sweet building!
[edit on 26-3-2007 by Harlowe JNkinz]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 11:14 AM by timeless test
|
I'm sure your right about the intention of the original post and all you say about charitable giving and our own greedy consumption, (mine most
certainly included), is undeniable.
In this particular instance it was just the futile extravagance of the project desiged for just 72 living units that struck me as being so absurd.
It's probably no worse that the fancy hotel and the man made islands in the great scheme of things but this does really seem to ram the gross
inequities of that part of the world down peoples throats.
I simply have a feeling that this concept, complete with its own private car lift, (for what purpose exactly?), somehow transcended the boundries of
cool and good taste and descended into the world of the tacky.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-3-2007 @ 11:22 AM by Harlowe JNkinz
|
Originally posted by timeless test
I'm sure your right about the intention of the original post and all you say about charitable giving and our own greedy consumption, (mine most
certainly included), is undeniable.
In this particular instance it was just the futile extravagance of the project desiged for just 72 living units that struck me as being so absurd.
It's probably no worse that the fancy hotel and the man made islands in the great scheme of things but this does really seem to ram the gross
inequities of that part of the world down peoples throats.
I simply have a feeling that this concept, complete with its own private car lift, (for what purpose exactly?), somehow transcended the boundries of
cool and good taste and descended into the world of the tacky.

I can agree with that...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 03:26 AM by nomadrush
|
I think it would make me feel sea-sick lol!
Ross
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 05:15 AM by misterfantastic
|
i dont like political battles at all. they can go on forever, this thread was meant to wooo the ingenius idea of a skyscraper with rotating floors.
i would have never thought of that myself, you can even change how fast the floor rotates when you get inside.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2007 @ 07:40 AM by timeless test
|
Originally posted by misterfantasticthis thread was meant to wooo the ingenius idea of a skyscraper with rotating floors. 
That's fair enough although I don't think it invalidates some of the more broadly based comments in the thread.
As for the building itself, well rotating floors are hardly new as they've been around for over 40 years, although this one does seem to trump others
by having more of them...
...and that's why I'm finding it hard to like or even admire this project. It's nothing new, it's not aesthetically pleasing to look at, it's
just , well, ...more.
Ugly in concept and execution I'm afraid.
[edit on 27-3-2007 by timeless test]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 05:31 AM by misterfantastic
|
i dont think someone would spend 500 million us to build something to look ugly.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 07:53 AM by timeless test
|
Originally posted by misterfantastic
i dont think someone would spend 500 million us to build something to look ugly. 
I think you could rustle up bus loads of critics of modern architecture, (which I generally am not), to disagree with you quite violently on that one,
but it's purely subjective of course.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 07:56 AM by ellroy
|
idea is almost a century old. check out Vladimir Tatlin's tower. They didn't have the means
to build it back then, but it would be some monument if they did.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |