Apparently Dr Bill Deagle has stated basically the following
"4th Generation Micro-Nukes were used in the destruction of the towers. Thermate alone could have never created a 1500F Rubble pile that stayed
hot for 6 weeks thereafter. A super advanced form of nuclear weapon, upon detonation it emits a heat pulse up to 4 million degrees centigrade,
causing the pillars of the towers to simply turn to dust."
He also has pointed some pretty direct fingers - stating that his high level NSA contacts have stated it was in effect a sub-contract job using
Israeli Mossad Nuclear Technicians and Russian GRU agents.
|
Originally posted by Sauron
What would have done this, if it was only jet fuel induced fires at WTC
The site hosting these pictures propose Star Wars Beam Weapons, what ever that is.
Well that aside, I don't know what would have done this, any ideas.
janedoe0911.tripod.com...
notice mostly all the vehicles have no tires, strange?
[edit on 24/3/2007 by Sauron]
Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 24/3/2007 by Mirthful Me]
did it ever occur to u that those cars where from ground zero and they were moved. think!!
|
He isn't saying that they were or weren't moved. He is saying what made the vehicles the way they are... Same goes in my thread but I am demanding
pretty much a straight answer...
Since you Official story people have all the answers..
And before you spout off about debris you may want to look at my thread...
Have a nice day.
|
Originally posted by logicaltruth14
Originally posted by Sauron
did it ever occur to u that those cars where from ground zero and they were moved. think!!
Hey logicalthruth, did it ever occur to you to read the thread you are posting too?
You will see what I had said, I don't think anyone denies the fact that some vehicles had been moved.
It's assumed by some they where moved to get more first responders on site.
 
[edit on 30/4/2007 by Sauron]
|
If the destruction of the towers involved some type of high tech government nuclear device then we're really in trouble.
|
reply to post by wingman77
Why is it SO hard to believe that our government has developed a new weapon? They spend trillions of dollars a year developing new weapons.. you
think their going to advertise to every yeehaw in the country that they have them? WAKE UP!
Our government has used our own people and our own soil to "test" their weapons before people. Why do you think they would not do it again?? WAKE
UP!
I'll bet the first time we dropped the atom bomb people were saying "it can't be.. that couldn't happen...it's science fiction, etc." Just
because they put it on the evening news does not make it "true". Open your minds and think.
Why are the gas tanks on these cars not exploding or on fire?
|
Looks like port Authority got their demo after all.
Where is all the concrete?
|
approx. 99% of the concrete was totally pulverised (that's over 250,000 tons of concrete). You would expect to find most of it stacked up in large
slabs from a natural collapse.
What i find slightly more jarring is what happened to the steel! According to Port Authority they actually recovered 160,000 tons of the 200,000 tons
of steel, but approx 14,000 tons of steel was 'too contaminated' to recycle and had to be buried. That leaves us with about 25,000 tons of steel
that apparently vaporised during the collapse. Official studies of the dust cloud created by the collapse showed that it contained tiny specks of
steel that were once beams and structural core elements from the building in the cloud.
|
Ok, Maggots - Listen Up... We have a Anti-Armor Weapon, That's right, No Army can defend itself from our weapon *here check out the Investigators
who developed it his name is Hutchinson and the effect is called Hutchinson Effect... ok, no rocket science yet, lets try watching some rocket
science...
video.google.com...
|
