UK troops captured by Iran, page 14
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 2-4-2007 @ 07:07 AM by Souljah
How I know Blair faked Iran map

There is no agreed boundary in the Northern Gulf, either between Iran and Iraq or between Iraq and Kuwait. The Iran-Iraq border has been agreed inside the Shatt al-Arab waterway, because there it is also the land border. But that agreement does not extend beyond the low tide line of the coast.

Even that very limited agreement is arguably no longer in force. Since it was reached in 1975, a war has been fought over it, and ten-year reviews - necessary because waters and sandbanks in this region move about dramatically - have never been carried out.

But what about the map the Ministry of Defence produced on Tuesday, with territorial boundaries set out by a clear red line, and the co-ordinates of the incident marked in relation to it?

I have news for you. Those boundaries are fake. They were drawn up by the MoD. They are not agreed or recognised by any international authority.

Furthermore;

German Armed Forces University: British Boundary Map "Fictitious"

In today's printed version of the Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Prof Khan of the University for the Federal Armed Forces in Munich confirms Craig Murrays statement:

"In their presentation, the British have effectively drawn a fictitious line in their attempt to prove where exactly the soldiers were when taken captive instead of showing a clear border. They couldn't have done the latter in any case as the border between Iran and Iraq around Shatt el-Arab is not clearly identifiable."

So who made up what?

I smell a rat coming out of MoD.

Usually their potty stinks most...


reply posted on 2-4-2007 @ 07:52 AM by Souljah
Originally posted by infinite
So,

you are using an internet blogger to prove your point now?

Nope;

I am using Mister
Craig Murray - Former Ambassador to Uzbekistan and Head of the Foreign Office's Maritime Section.

Please Read:

I am best known as the former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, but from 1989 to 1992 I headed the Foreign Office's maritime section. This included responsibility for territorial sea claims and for negotiating our own maritime boundaries. The expertise of the Royal Navy was invaluable.

For eight months I also worked with Royal Naval and Defence Intelligence Service personnel in the Embargo Surveillance Centre, a secret unit operating 24 hours a day from an underground command centre in Central London to prevent Iraqi attempts at weapons procurement.

We analysed information from intelligence and other sources, and could instruct Royal Naval craft in the Gulf to board and inspect individual ships. I was responsible for getting the political clearance for operations just like the one now in question, in this exact location. So I know what I'm talking about.

Not that I agree with current actions of Iranian government - but ask yourself, what would you do in the same scenario? I think that Iranian government is bad and provocative and not really obeying international laws; but the question is, how many countries act like that too and always can get away with it? Certain more Powerful countries, which can say that their MAP IS THE BEST and that the other map sucks. Frankly both of them need to stop boosting their egos and start to tell us the Truth. If the U.K. government admits they were breaing Iranian territoral waters I bet that those marines would be hours away from home. But we all know that the big ego of mister Tony shall never allow that. So we have crisis...


reply posted on 2-4-2007 @ 08:43 AM by devilwasp
Originally posted by Souljah
I am using Mister
Craig Murray - Former Ambassador to Uzbekistan and Head of the Foreign Office's Maritime Section.

Yes ambassador to Uzbekistan, why didn you try the ambassador to iran? Oh no wait there stuck in the embassy by rioters.
Ever considered this guy has an agenda of his own.
Ps see other threads for debunking hsi theory.
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^