Originally posted by kozmo
The two seemingly were two different issues until I read this recent article on
The Inuit.

Unfortunately, the article is gone.

This got me to thinking... although the explaination in the article is plausible, it does not seem probable. I am beginning to believe that
the two issues are in fact one in the same and that science is being prevented from disclosing our fate.

In fact, they're not. The earth's crust is still continuing to shift (continental drift) and the poles are still continuing to drift... just as
they've always done.
The Hapgood, etc, sites are based on very old information (we've learned a LOT since 1945). Their arguments are the equivalent of saying that "bad
air causes malaria and an overactive liver causes you to have multiple sclerosis."
While it's a good idea to examine scientific theories (and scientists do this all the time), it's first a good idea to ask:
* how current are these ideas
* which scientists (with degrees in the field) are supporting this idea (because it's a bad assumption to think you can read a few web pages and know
all there is about geology. I've got a good layman's understanding of geology and I can tell you there's a LOT I don't know.)
* if there aren't any scientists with degrees in the field supporting it (or currently supporting it), be very suspicious.
* how much information do you have (from science websites) about the phenomina.
Why that last point?
Frankly, because people lie. Yes, scientists do sometimes, but part of the science game is that if someone challenges your idea, you check for
research and papers that refute them. Liars are usually caught within a relatively short time period (longer back when we only communicated by
letters -- Piltdown took a longer time to expose as a hoax) and very quickly in modern times (some of the "munged" fossils from China.)
There's no such check and balance on regular websites. I could put up one saying that pole shifts are caused by the moon's wobble and lie through
my teeth about the orbital shift of the moon. You guys couldn't tell that I was lying, particularly if I threw up some scientific terms and
formulas.
So look for sources where they HAVE to be accountable and HAVE to explain themselves.
And European scientists have known for over 400 years that the magnetic poles shift.
Poleshift.org is an honest site, but it's evident they don't know much about geology or they'd mention the geologic columns as part of the evidence
for the slow continental drift and the evidence for subsidance and rising of land.
Science Frontiers is an odd website. They do no filtering of the content or investigation, so you can find hoaxes and misinterpretations galore
there. I don't agree with everything there, and the sources that they cherry pick their information from can be questionable. Still, it's an
interesting site. Again, the content there is based on fairly old material.
"Troubled times" is the site of a self-proclaimed prophet of doom who's so far been wrong every single year for the past decade. She "channels"
information from the least reliable "aliens" in the universe, and many of her statements on the "troubled times" index are wrong (there are, in
fact, no "flash frozen" mammoths.)
There's no doubt that the magnetic poles will flip within the next few centuries, but the amount of "chaos" it's likely to cause is minimal. Even
GPS doesn't rely on magnetic data readings, though it does have a magnetic north indicator. Some migrating animals and birds and insects MAY be in
trouble... maybe. We don't know.
The earth's magnetic poles have shifted hundreds of times and none of those seems to correspond with any dieoff in lifeforms or any rapid expansion
of new species. Continental drift is slow and does create econiches (as does the rising and subsidance of land) and does create change over millions
of years.
2012 is only the end of the Aztec calendar. No other civilization records any significance to that date.