It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What could cause these holes? WTC5 is not adjacent to a Twin Tower, as WTC4 and WTC6 were. Thus WTC5 was less likely to suffer damage from the destruction of a Twin Tower than WTC4 and WTC6 were, as shown by Figure 75 on page 6. A piece of aircraft fuselage was allegedly found on the roof of WTC5. Can you find the fuselage piece in Figure 62? If not, you're not alone. When did a fuselage piece shown in Figure 62(c) arrive on the roof of WTC5?
The fuselage piece in Figure 62(d) made popular by Popular Mechanics is located between the two raised roof sections of WTC5. This location in the large picture is identified by a circle and arrow in the small photo, Figure 62(d). There is only one aircraft item, the rest is aluminum cladding and other building debris.
Originally posted by sp00n1
Let me see if i get this right. I am basing this on some of CB's posts, so who knows?
There were no planes, only holograms. BUT, the molten metal that STEVEN JONES, a CIA disinfo agent, uses to prove thermite is actually molten aluminum from the hologram planes?!?!
Since these hologram planes, that werent really there, left aluminum that melted, that proves thermite couldnt have been used and therefor it HAD TO BE energy beams???
Originally posted by Cosmocow
holograms....give me a break!!!!
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
The Good Lord ain’t gonna help us here. Cause he had nothing to do with 9-11!
I kind of agree with you — there was no reason to fake the planes with holograms. I mean what for, when you control the media and can show anything you want to on television ‘coverage’. The 9-11 organizers didn’t even need to do a good job of that.
--------------This is irrelevant. There are hundreds of thousands of witnesses, and documentation. There is no reason to fake footage either --------------
Had 9-11 videos been a Hollywood movie, people would have demanded their money back. Each and every single picture of those planes smashing into the WTC’s is so amateurishly assembled, it’s offensive to our intelligence. We only initially believed it because it was too outrageous for us to fathom anything else.
--------------What is offensive to my intelligence is disinfo. -------------
So — no, it wasn’t necessary to simulate planes on site at the twin towers.
-----------so you have no real motive for this nonsense------------------
But it would have been IMPOSSIBLE to use real aircraft. Because real aircraft wont fly through a wall of 14 by 14, quarter inch thick steel box beam columns with only 25” of open space in between, and solid nearly 5 ft wide 3/8” thick steel plate belts of steel (spandrels). Not to mention all the other obstacles behind that outer wall of voodoo.
------------500+ mph, 100 tons. Do your own calculations. ----------
And generating fireballs, if that is indeed what they did
------------oh, so all those New Yorkers imagined it now? Maybe there were under the spell of some Darpa MKUltra Collective Mind Controll Space Alien Trance-----------
as opposed to simply editing them in as special effects in a studio, is easier than a trip to grandma’s house. Surely you know that.
--------------see above since this point is also irrelevant------------
The Wizard In The Woods