Phoenix Project - Stealth/Invisibility/Montauk

(the short of it) Based on the account of the "Philadelphia Experiment" - Project Phoenix; We know of the “dude” that jumped off the side of the ship, Elderidge, on August 12th 1943 and was found on August 12th 1983, at Montauk, and taken downstairs to von Neumann and then sent back to 1943 to destroy the equipment etc etc etc (I won’t go into the detail here) however, do we know of any OTHER testaments of the people on that ship that perhaps had/have first hand knowledge and saw what happened. Naturally some were put in “looney bins” and others were discredited. Therefore, if they were discredited they obviously had something to say but were not believed. Does anyone know of any such testimony/s? If so, is there a link to a site etc?

Also, we know that Duncan “thought” up the “monster” which cause havoc and basically destroyed the project AND the fact that a UFO was sucked into the vortex. Consideration for the fact that the tunnels etc were cemented up (at Montauk - Camp Hero), could we assume or believe there is proof of the monster’s existence AND proof of the UFO still down there?

[edit on 20/3/2007 by shearder]

ya what ever. The USS Eldridge wasn't even comissioned until August 27 1943 in the New York Naval Yard.

so how could it be in Norfolk two weeks earlier?

Originally posted by shearder
do we know of any OTHER testaments of the people on that ship that perhaps had/have first hand knowledge and saw what happened. Naturally some were put in “looney bins” and others were discredited. Therefore, if they were discredited they obviously had something to say but were not believed. Does anyone know of any such testimony/s? If so, is there a link to a site etc?

You've pretty well ended the discussion at this point, since you're essentially putting all possible testimony into three groups:

1) Those who say nothing happend. Obviously 'disinfo' agents of The Government, and lying through their teeth.

2) Those who say something happened, but whose stories don't fit with other available evidence (the discredited witnesses). They obviously had something to say, but were silenced.

3) Those who say something happened, and whose stories do 'add up'. You seem to think that these people are the only ones telling the Truth, since in groups 1 and 2 you've eliminated everyone else. You've decided, in advance, that the only evidence you're interested in hearing is that evidence that supports your position.

The entire 'Philly Experiment' is very questionable, though it did give us at least one fairly entertaining B-movie. Adding in the 'supporting evidence' of the Psychic Warrior Who Shall Remain Nameless doesn't support much either, since, despite several opportunities to actually demonstrate some of his 'superhuman' abilities, there seems to be a distinct lack of proof that he's much other than a good story teller.

Yes, I'm skeptical. Note that 'skeptical' isn't the same thing as 'close-minded'....it's simply an open mind that wants some evidence.