Alien Critters On Mars? Check This Out!!!

o my god!i looked at the pic for how long and i was only seing a "V" shadow....i saw the true thing at the end when the fellow member painted it green....i should be ashamed of my self
yea superb work this thread and this thing on the picture is something more of a rock for sure,really looks like some snake/worm

Mike, the Viking 1 and 2 Landers were set up to view the landscape in The Third Dimension in other words in three dimensions.

All along I have been telling the viewers on many ATS threads that I can see in 3-D and am able to see many of the anomalies that many can not. I will state as I have before there is life on Mars and this includes animal, biological and as well as humanoid lifeforms on the surface of Mars. dragon.larc.nasa.gov...

I am 1000% sure that life exists on Mars and is varified by Viking 1 and 2, Sojourner Pathfinder, Spirit and Opportunity Landscape photos. Rik Riley



[edit on 9-8-2007 by rikriley]

Agreed. Lots of folks going a little out there on the edge on this topic, jumping to stupid conclusions and not using common sense. There may be microbial like on Mars, but I doubt anything more.

'May be' and 'doubt'? That means you agree that life on Mars is a possibility!! You've contradicted yourself here. And then if microbes have been in existence for millions of years (maybe billions) then natural evolution would have resulted in them evolving into slightly more advanced life forms such as these critters?

Food for thought!

Cheers! We're not alone!

I guess I couldn't see the images,at least on Firefox browser because you'd probably exceeded your bandwidth limit on photo saver program.I am sure they were probably good too.ere are some of mine for your fans.I designed Mars rovers 1987 and I find my share of Mars people,animals & fossils. jpl123@inbox.com Jerry Lehane III myspace jerrylehaneiii alt="Photobucket"> The Draco above(golden color) is probably an ancestor of the tiny version sitting on rock.The large version may be alive on Mars as we speak.Pretty scary to meet probably for us...shocker. i8.photobucket.com... s8.photobucket.com...

I did a split hsl on it and the little thing, whatever it is, is emerging from a arch shaped hole, that is in the side of a longer rectangular structure, running diagonally from the bottom center to the top right. there are several of these arches, one right after the other but that one appears to be the only one from which one of those little things is emerging. my guess is it's some kind of indigenous life form. perhaps an insect of some kind, as the arch shaped holes do remind me a bit of cells like in a honeycomb. half of its body is out of the picture (Because it's inside the hole)

[edit on 3-2-2008 by undo]

reply to post by undo

---

Check out the critter's 'movement' here...


Courtesy: John Bro

Hey, John! Found any more critters on Mars???

reply to post by mikesingh

---

That is not movement, unless the ground is also moving.

If that animation was made with the three images available from the three filters then the "movement" is just because the shades of grey change.

You can see that the shadow does not "move".

reply to post by disownedsky

---

Given Mars history? We barely know anything of our own. (And yes I am informed on the matter). We don't know what was on the planet millions of years ago. We don't know if there was indeed enough time for the planet to harbor life more complex than just microbes. We don't know a f'ing thing about Mars.

Folks if you really want to see some very strange anomalies from the archives that are pretty thought provoking please take a look at this site. I do not endorse and certainly do not think everything you see on the site is a fact. If you go there to just look at the pictures, don't bother, "believe me there are many of them." read what the author has to say before you make a decision for yourself. marsanomalyresearch.com/

reply to post by TEMELUCHUS

---

I already know that site, and it's one of a small list of sites that I do not respect because they ignore anything that does not suit their ideas.

I don't think that they are interested in the truth, just in their version of the facts.

reply to post by mikesingh

---

Hello Mike, I have put a post up with a site I think "you" would be interested in if you have not already been to it. If you have, just disregard and continue. Just thought I'd toss it at ya.

I don't see what can be gained by splitting the image to its HSL components, the image is a composite made with some grayscale images, those images are the ones I think you should analyse, not the HSL components of a false colour image made with them.

And I don't think that the "critter" is running, unless you call running to being in the same place and position for at least 82 seconds (the time between two of the images with the "critter" in it).

Could you please post the image resulting from the HSL split where you see all these things? I tried to do it but I do not see anything that looks like what you describe.

I could not understand how they could have made that panorama with the images available on the Rovers site.

I know that these images are from only the second day of operations on Mars by Opportunity, but I was expecting better images.

These are the images published by NASA on their Rovers site:

Left camera, filter 2
Right camera, filter 2

82 seconds after
Left camera, filter 5
22 seconds after the previous image
Left camera, filter 6
27 seconds after the previous image
Right camera, filter 7

I thought that these images have such a bad quality that they could not have made the panorama with them, so I went looking for the images on the Online Data Volumes - Mars Exploration Rover (MER) on the PDS imaging node.

The images they have there are much better, even the JPGs.

Bellow are links for the same images as before.
Left camera, filter 2
Right camera, filter 2
Left camera, filter 5
Left camera, filter 6
Right camera, filter 7

These look like the images used to make the panorama, and if that is case then they could have made an even bigger image.

---

I wonder why NASA keeps those awfull looking images on the Rover's site when they have these...

Too bad the "Mars figure" is not on the PDS Imaging Node yet, we have to wait.

Hi TEMELUCHUS! Thanks. If your meaning the site, 'mars anomaly research', then yes. Joseph Skipper is an acquaintance of mine and he has a fairly decent site with a lot of effort going into it.

But as ArMaP rightly mentioned, some of the stuff is pure fiction, because it has been proved to be so.

Cheers!

reply to post by ArMaP

---

What sites do you recommend for researching such anomalies?

reply to post by cockadoodledo

---

The one who has the original data, those are the best!

Nothing like using official data to prove what you want, it may be more difficult (the "specialised" sites have part of the work already done for us) but at least we are not limited or influenced by other people's ideas (and that is what all the "specialised" sites that I have seen do).

But you could use a forum I know, called ATS.

Absolutely right ArMaP, though I did notice you did not care to provide us with even ONE link to a site that as you put it has "the original data"

But no worries... we have amongst us here at ATS one who has worked at Pine Gap Australia and he has all the proof you need...

Its amazing really that we missed this thread...

He talks about the spark plug found off world in a rock, the Martian bug that was brought back from Mars and is squirming around in an aquarium at Pine Gap...

This guy must be for real... though its funny that he has been on the attack against John for so long and now is claiming all the NAZI tech, the ET tech etc etc is all at Pine Gap and not in Area 51...

He even says he has permission from his ex bosses to 'correct' our thinking...

You just have to check this out no credentials offered and everyone is lapping it up... And so far the hordes of skeptics have yet to find him...

I refer to Doghead...

This thread...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

So while we are arguing images... this guy has all the answers



Well considering how things work here at ATS... it would not surprise me in the least if he IS the real deal



[edit on 5-2-2008 by zorgon]

reply to post by projectvxn

---

Just because there are many open questions about Mars doesn't mean we don't know anything about it's past. I think we do know that Mars has been cold and dry for a very long time - billions of years, not just millions. It remains possible that Mars was once warm and wet, but I don't think anyone would seriously propose that this was any more recent than 2 - 3 billion years ago, and most would push the dates further back. There are simply too many extinct cinder cones still intact, too many ancient lava flows, too much evidence that wind erosion has dominated for a long time, and way too many craters.

reply to post by zorgon

---

The sites vary, as you know, depending on the anomaly and who/what was the origin of the data that shows the anomaly.

In the case of these "critters" that would be a site with what is, as far as I know, the original data, like the PDS Imaging node online volumes.

There are probably more sites with the original data, but I don't know them, my research is only at the beginning, done in my free time, so most of my information comes from ATS.

PS: thanks for the link to the other thread, I will look at it.