United States Air Force - Aircraft Crash Investigator: Speaks About 9/11

Col George Nelson, retired USAF Aircraft Crash Investigator, explains how there's no evidence that the original planes crashed where the government/media claim. What he says makes sense to me. Does anyone think he's wrong?

Aircraft Parts and the Precautionary Principle

Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:
Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity

by George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)

The precautionary principle is based on the fact it is impossible to prove a false claim. Failure to prove a claim does not automatically make it false, but caution is called for, especially in the case of a world-changing event like the alleged terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The Bush administration has provided no public evidence to support its claim that the terror attacks were the work of Muslim extremists or even that the aircraft that struck their respective targets on September 11 were as advertised. As I will show below, it would be a simple matter to confirm that they were - if they were. Until such proof is forthcoming, the opposite claim must be kept in mind as a precaution against rushing to judgment: the 911 hijackings were part of a black operation carried out with the cooperation of elements in our government.


Full article here:
physics911.net...

Mod Edit: No Quote – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 18/3/2007 by Mirthful Me]

[edit on 18-3-2007 by CB_Brooklyn]