#1 Reason To Believe..., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 16-3-2007 @ 01:43 PM by Connected
With my recent research and direct questioning, I have found out one of the main reasons people believe the official 911 report, over any alternative explanation.



#1 Reason:

"It would be too big a conspiracy to be covered up for so long by so many people. People can't help but talk. A secret is only a secret till you tell 1 person, then it will get out...EVERY TIME."



Ok lets discuss this...

Why do you think it would be hard to cover up and keep quiet? Obviously, the people who planed and executed 911 profited from it in some way. Why would they risk their own lives by confessing? Even if they DID confess, how many people would believe it? Wouldn't the masterminds find a way to silence everyone? Didn't you hear reports about the airport employees getting death threats from the FBI, forcing them to not talk about the flight paths, and recordings from the jets? I did. What about the "missing black boxes" from the jets that crashed into WTC 1 and 2. Supposedly they were found by firefighters, yet a few FBI agents took them and told them to keep quiet? Did you hear about that? What about the death threats to the hotel employees that saw the video near the Pentagon? There is evidence of a cover up with just those stories.

The majority of the 911 helpers would probably be in the government, and they would probably get sent to jail for "threat to national security" if they did say anything. It would be ultra easy to silence any word that did get out, because they control the media. For example, FEMA admitted to being in N.Y. ready for a disaster the day before it happened. Later, the government came back and made a cover up excuse and said "he was tired, and made a mistake". Also, when Silverstien sort of claimed that they CD'd the building, later the government made a cover up story saying "he meant the firefighters effort" even though the building was already empty.

You see it is totally possible to make cover up stories.

According to the official reports, about 21 terrorists/people helped execute 911. How come THEY didn't let the secret out during the planning stages? How can someone believe 21 people can execute 911, and then claim it would take 100+ people if the government did it?

Anyway, I think it is ridiculous to base their belief of 911, on something like this.




[edit on 16-3-2007 by Connected]


reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 02:21 PM by Connected
Originally posted by whiterabbit
Because those 21 people thought they were doing something good. Those 21 people thought they were doing God's work and were going to be rewarded. Who WOULDN'T keep something a secret if they thought that?


You have a reversed way of logic. Usually when people are about to be a part of something "good" they would tell everyone, and let everyone know they are doing "good". Usually when people are about to be a part of something "bad" thats when they keep the secret. I don't understand your way of thought, but I congratulate you on your answer that you pulled from where the sun dont shine.

Originally posted by whiterabbit
However, anyone who kept the 9/11 conspiracy secret would be knowingly helping in the biggest mass murder in American history. You would have to be serial killer evil to do that. Like Hitler, Stalin evil. Do you know anybody like that? I don't. There's people like that, but they're a rare breed.


The entire Bush family.

Bush Senior, when he was president, would market and push a "New World Order" agenda. He ran ad's in newspapers that had skull and bones on them, with symbols like "NWO". The NWO calls for a massive decrease in Earths population. A figure of 1/3 the population comes to my mind.

Originally posted by whiterabbit
And how much money would it take for you to keep your mouth shut about the murder of 3000 people? A million? Ten million? A hundred million?


Yes, a hundred million sounds about right for me! Everyone has their price.

Originally posted by whiterabbit
You say threat of death keeps them quiet as well. Would you stay quiet, knowing you might die, if you thought 3000 people were going to get murdered? I wouldn't. I couldn't live with myself. And I'm certainly no moral guy.


I would stay quiet, yes. Why? Because even if I did tell someone about 911, who is going to believe me? I'll be killed if I did blow the whistle, and nothing can stop them from carrying out the attacks, so why loose my life over something that will still happen even if I did blow the whistle?


Originally posted by whiterabbit
At minimum, you're talking dozens of people, most likely hundreds. And none of them had the moral fortitude to reject the money or the threat of death and save those people's lives? Not even one?


Not even one? How did you come up with that conclusion? How do you know that some people DID blow the whistle, yet nobody herd it? Covered up before it could be talked about? Heck, didn't that one TV show 'Lone Gunmen' have an episode where jets were hijacked or something and aimed at the WTC?? It aired before 911. How do you know what wasn't someone trying to send a message to the world without getting caught?

Originally posted by whiterabbit
Highly unlikely doesn't begin to describe it.


Thats great, so you are going to base your decision on a bunch of "what ifs" and "this what i would do", personal beliefs? Why don't you wake up, and take a look outside, there are some pretty evil people in this world. People get killed over candy here in L.A.


reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 02:27 PM by whiterabbit
Originally posted by Connected
You have a reversed way of logic. Usually when people are about to be a part of something "good" they would tell everyone, and let everyone know they are doing "good".


Not if telling someone will keep that "good" thing from happening.

Yes, a hundred million sounds about right for me! Everyone has their price.


A hundred million dollars to how many people? And where did that come from? It's not like the president can just write a check for this stuff.

I would stay quiet, yes. Why? Because even if I did tell someone about 911, who is going to believe me? I'll be killed if I did blow the whistle, and nothing can stop them from carrying out the attacks, so why loose my life over something that will still happen even if I did blow the whistle?


Someone on the inside like that would have evidence that could get people to believe. They'd have access to plans, documents, something.


Not even one? How did you come up with that conclusion?


My point was that it's unlikely that not even one of them would of talked.

In all likelihood, lots of people would have come forward.

Thats great, so you are going to base your decision on a bunch of "what ifs" and "this what i would do", personal beliefs? Why don't you wake up, and take a look outside, there are some pretty evil people in this world. People get killed over candy here in L.A.


I know there's evil people in the world.

However, if you think a few dozen to a few hundred of your fellow Americans would all be evil enough to be complicit in mass murder, you're wrong. They wouldn't. I wouldn't, and I'm just another guy. Unless they had some magic way of finding the most evil, soulless people in the country, it just doesn't hold up.


reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 02:32 PM by Connected
Originally posted by sensfan
I see you are quoting me when giving the number one reason, thanks, but I do not see how you can come up with this being the number one reason people believe the official story, or part of at.


Because every official report supporter I have talked to, mentioned this reason. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM, including you.

Originally posted by sensfan
There is no ONE reason to believe or disbelieve.


I am aware of that, this #1 reason is the most common though.


Originally posted by sensfan
There are many posts on here that debate EVERY aspect of the 9/11 tragedy. Better off reading through them and finding out what you want to know. I fear that if this thread goes on like your last topic...


Ive read, herd, and seen everything regarding 911. There are 100's of facts that you official story supporters don't have any type of counter argument for.

Originally posted by sensfan
...that was closed because you and other's couldn't help but argue back and forth and flame each other.


Thanks for bringing that up, now, you are going to help derail this topic as well? Do you guys ever quit? I'm constantly forced to defend myself, and this is a great example of it. You guys cant just debate or talk about something without bringing up things from other topics can you? Are you debunkers trying to fog the air? Cover it with bullsh#t so that its hard to see? Thats a common tactic believe it or not. Get a really good subject going that may possibly shine some light on the truth, and you debunkers change the subject, and go off on something else. That is your only defense right?

Dont answer that... ignore it... dont talk about it again.. get back on the frikken subjet.


reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 02:43 PM by CameronFox
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by CameronFox
They have proof.


They do? So what are we all still doing here then? Why are you still here trying to convince us the official story is true if 'they' have proof?

You know yourself you can't even come up with an answer for one of the most basic physics anomalies of the event, the 'South Tower Tilt', yet you claim they have proof?

What proof???? I'd love to see it because then I could start thinking about other things than 9-11. The stuff that contradicts your 'proof' is either ignored or distorted beyond logic.

No. 1 reason for believing the OS is either denial or outright lying, for whatever reason imo. The obvious is staring us all in the face.


Anok... I have sent you U2U's, Ive posted the reasons as to how the towers collapsed... YOU however once again have FAILED to prove ANYTHING. Prove ONE thing with an explination as to HOW. Explain WHAT happened to your tilting tower. You claim OVER and OVER... "simple physics"...yet you NEVER back it up with an explination. EVER. Tell me... heck tell us ALL what happened. Tell us what happened to that tower... simply saying... "it was CD" and not have ANYTHING to back it up does not convince me. Believe it or not I have an open mind....BUT, I take EVERYTHING with a grain of salt. Especially when i am reading posts from people on the internet that never back up what they say with proof.

Once again.. show me where I have lied. HAs any of my posts been inaccurate? Im sure! That does not and will not make me a liar.

Did the government lie? IMO ... yes.. can i PROVE it... well..not it court. It's my OPINION as to me thinking Bush was not doing his job during 911. Thats all.

So in closing...Anok...YOU, my new "foe" need to back up your claims with some type of explination as to what casued the towers to collaspe.



EDIT TO ADD: here is the link to the thread...in my second post on the page I explain the collapse the best way i know... your reponse says NOTHING.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 16-3-2007 by CameronFox]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags