UFO Tallahassee (Updated), page 14
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 55 times


reply posted on 13-5-2007 @ 05:50 PM by john gillies
Originally posted by Karilla
Hi, Tally, and John, I have a question for both of you. In both videos there appears to be some distortion emanating from the underside of the UFO. Was this more or less visible with the naked eye?

You can see a hint of it in this screen grab:



And thanks, both of you, for bringing some of the best footage I've seen.


Hi.When i was filming UFobject i was spending more time trying to get the best picture/footage i could get of the ufobject and can not recall seeing any distortion emanating from the underside of the UFO.


reply posted on 13-5-2007 @ 06:35 PM by john gillies
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by manastin
Originally posted by torsion
We can see some of the so called 'cloaking' similarities in this video footage, though this is a night time shot...
www.youtube.com...

Please watch till the end...He is making a joke (indeed, a bad one)..listen to last sentence "this is planet Venus".


Yes, I did watch the entire video and I agree with the maker that Venus is quite often mistaken for a ufo.

But can you not see the similarities between out of focus Venus and the objects in the other videos?

I'm not saying they are Venus, but I'm sure that their shape is just a focussing issue and not a 'cloaking' effect some people claim.


Venus is quite often mistaken for a ufo. but Venus can not disappear or shoot off in 1min of filming as for the focus if you have cam set to Auto Focus then it will be working away trying to get the best picture it can. on manul focus you do that. both looking for shape of object so if the object you are filming is round it will show that shape more, filming in optical zoom or in digatal zoom what i am saying is if it was a helicopter in distances and you still could not make it out with focus in optical zoom then you go on to digatal zoom it will show helicopter.


reply posted on 21-12-2007 @ 12:44 PM by johnxe22
Hello to whoever took this video,

I just ran across this video and was delighted to find it. In the summer 1998 i was with a friend from the Philippines. We had been escorted by a man, his girl friend and their son to visit the great wall of China outside of Beijing.

The young boy was holding my hand as we walked on top of the wall with many others, my head was looking down to the ground. I often walk this way, lost in thought. The young boy of five - seven years age started pulling on my hand for attention. I looked at him and he pointed to the sky.

Then i saw what everyone else (at least twenty people) were looking at in the sky - it was a glowing orb, about one third of the distance as seen in this video. We all stood there puzzled and gazed at it at least ten minutes. It never moved but we all new from the overcast sky and noon-day time that it was not a sun-dog or any other type of reflection. It had it's own luminosity. Since it didn't move and we didn't know much more of what it was we moved on with our schedule of the day.

My friend took a picture of it with his wide-angle handheld camera. He eventually sent it to me and i lost it due to hard drive failure - but i didn't really care. It didn't capture the effect of what we had experienced. I have a better memory of it than the photograph. However, this tape is EXACTLY the same thing that we saw.

I can only express my deep gratitude to the person whoever made this video. I KNOW that what you taped is real and not a hoax.

Sincerely,
John Anderson
xe22@sbcglobal.net


reply posted on 13-4-2008 @ 08:35 AM by kink1man
Personally, I don't think this one will ever be explained unless we can convince the pilot of this particular craft to join us here, maybe give us a tour of his fancy flying machine and tell us what the heck he was doing buzzing around Tallahassee that day. (My guess is he probably wanted to spend the long weekend with relatives in the area). But usually if a UFO is identified, it's identified as something we've all seen before, but for some reason did not recognize this time, perhaps because of lighting effects or distance, etc etc. But the Tally UFO looks like nothing I've ever seen before. None of the usual suspects for misidentification fit this one at all (imo). And it doesn't look like CGI or any other kind of fake either. I think it would've looked a lot better if it was! But the inability to keep the camera focused lends credence to this one. It should be impossible to focus on an object that is very far away and in motion. But when the camera does focus enough to give us a view of the object, I think most of us realize immediately what it is not: it's not a plane, it's not a helicopter, it's not the hubcap off a '67 VW Beetle - in fact the list of what it's not is virtually endless. The list of what it could be is very small. For me, it could be one of two things: 1) some kind of top-secret military aircraft (low probability), or 2) aircraft of extraterrestrial origin (BINGO!). However since I can't actually prove either one (and it's doubtful either of those two parties are going to come forward and say "ok it was us", then we'll have to settle for calling it unidentified. Kinda makes me wonder though, now when I look at the stars. How many more of those things are hiding among them? Watch the skies! (And your wallet!)


reply posted on 25-7-2008 @ 05:30 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts



The only thing I think I remember (I may wrong) is that at the end (or near the end) he was lying on his back pointing the camera up.


reply posted on 10-8-2008 @ 07:22 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by damajikninja
Man am I glad to see this thread rise from the ashes! Tally's video was amazing... and this new corroborating footage is just as interesting. So many parallels.


Has this one been seen yet? I didn't see it in the thread, but then I too started a thread on this one





I love this one because it fits with my 'critter' theory... the erratic flight, the change in shape, the 'translucence' the 'glow' moving around inside... the appearance of a second one...

Don't suppose I could talk you into doing more clips?

I know many will say this idea is nuts.. but it ties in with the NASA UFO's filmed in infrared and fits a whole lot of other observations...

I think if more attention was focused on those that 'might' be plasma lifeforms' it would clear up many UFO mysteries...

In effect they are ET but NOT Aliens as their natural environment is in space and within our atmosphere and near space thus making them ET... but they are local to our neck of the woods... I suspect our planetary magnetic shield is part of the reason they are here

Any chance we can get a downloadable copy of the new version with the added footage? I couldn't get it on Google and see no button here

www.realufos.net...



reply posted on 10-8-2008 @ 08:01 PM by UncleSlam
Here is a direct link to the longer version on google video. I have seen a better quality version, but couldn't locate it.
video.google.com...

Another longer version which shows more of the beginning part which starts with him playing with his kids in the back yard, just before they noticed the object.
video.google.com...


reply posted on 10-8-2008 @ 08:30 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Curious as to the focus issues the camera had. Can someone please tell me (too lazy to read the entire thread


Memorial Day 09/05/2005 Tallahassee, Florida UFO - 30 min - Apr 18, 2007
Memorial Day, at home with family and kids were asking about "jet trails" in the sky and I explained what they were and such and that maybe ...all » Memorial Day, at home with family and kids were asking about "jet trails" in the sky and I explained what they were and such and that maybe the next weekend we could come out to watch the night sky for falling stars. My daughter asked about a "star" in the sky, and then moments later said it was "moving". I looked back up again and it was not where it was seconds before. The UFO then moved very fast, faster than a fighter jet or satellite passing in a night sky, going across the clear blue sky making a huge number "4" pattern with NO trails or smoke, just the formation of the number "4". The UFO stopped for only a split second at what would be each "point" or "corner" before finishing up what looked like the massive number "4". Just after seeing this, I'm guessing almost 10 minutes passed before we could get out our video camera, a Canon ES75 with 22x zoom and 800x digital zoom, to catch the scene. I removed some "audio" from the video to protect "names" and other personal information, but the video is in "as is" condition and unchanged. We heard NO sounds from the objects, but there is plenty of "bug sounds" coming from our woods. The "auto-zoom" on the camera plays havoc on the video as it tries to focus, zooming in and out a lot, making for many "fuzzy" shots. The iris of the camera lens can give a sideways "diamond" look to an object as it zooms "in and out", however the close-up does show the object's "real shape". There was no mention on the local news of anything "strange" or anywhere we looked on the Internet in the following weeks. We never felt comfortable in releasing this until today 03-13-2007. Now because we saw a similar looking UFO video on the Internet, we want to share what we saw. I welcome comments and questions! A very strange object that had to be "large" to be seen at such a high altitude. I'm guessing it must have been 40k or more at times



Guys, I hate to say this, but this video is worthless. Attack me all you want, but this video is nothing spectacular.



ITF

ITF

ITF

That oughta cover it





[edit on 10-8-2008 by zorgon]


reply posted on 11-8-2008 @ 06:19 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by zorgon



The change in shape and "glow" may be a result of the camera trying to focus on the object.

If you have a video camera you can try it for yourself, a small, far away object is difficult for the auto-focus to work with, so it gets in and out of focus constantly.

If that was the case, the change in shape would be a result of the position of the object relative to the centre of the lens.
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags