It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by micpsi
Thermite is a red herring. Even if Professor Steven Jones' findings were confirmed by other scientists, sceptics could still argue that what was detected was thermite used by workers at Ground Zero to cut up girders. There are, indeed, photos suggesting that thermite was used in the clear-up. See Fig 14(a), (b) & (c) at nomoregames.net... . So, if you think the alleged discovery of thermite by Professor Jones is a smoking gun, you are sadly mistaken.
Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn
Judy Wood was fired and her student was murdered.... the one student who was doing 9/11 research with her to prove Steven Jones' work faulty. Check the 2nd link above for details.
Originally posted by talisman
I know you want to attack Jones at any chance, you can start another thread on that. But let us put that aside here since this thread is about Woods and her 'Energy Beams'.
Judy Wood and her story is ridiculous. She had a chance to talk about it, and quite frankly she did a very poor job. I'm being as honest as I can be.
BTW it isn't an insult what I said earlier about her, it is the truth. That is exactly how she came across. Look we are dealing with 9/11 where people lost loved ones and many things happened.
If people want to go public with outlandish things then they are fair game, since 9/11 isn't just another topic, the search for truth is of paramount importance.
I don't think tolerating people like Woods who are doing nothing but discrediting the search for truth is wise.
Jenkins did a very fine job of refuting the 'science' in his article which got into some technical language. I don't defend Jenkins, but he sure as hell was reasonable 90% of the time.
If you don't accept Jenkins or Jones, then fine. Don't accept them, but this surely isn't the reason to jump on the Judy Wood's and Fetzer train.
Jenkins might have been a little sarcastic, he might have been a little bit of everything and nothing, it doesn't change the fact that anyone with a fair and open mind can see clear as day how she behaved, her logic and her evasive answers were enough.
She looked to be right out of it. That is exactly how she looked and I think most would agree. The film speaks for itself.
What you were saying earlier in another thread is deceptive, she did in fact offer on the Fetzer show the idea that these 'Beams' could have been fired from Space, arguing that she doesn't call them 'Space Weapons' or 'Space Beams' is just playing word games. An Energy Beam fired from Space to me is a space weapon end of debate.
Fetzer then comes along and starts talking about the source being Bldg-7. I mean come on, for the love of God. From what source did the Beam come from??? So either it came from above in space-- from a satellite, or from Building 7!? This is absolute hogwash.
What Science do you have? What peer reviewed accepted article or paper saying:
ENERGY BEAMS TAKING DOWN THE TOWERS is a viable hypothesis.
Show me this.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I had never heard that before and it's very interesting. Doesn't explain the molten thermite puring from the building before collpase, but mabe tnat was melted plane...
I was a MAJOR supporter of Jones who emailed 100s of structural engineering professors asking for support. It took me a while to "see it", but I now know he's a plant. But you need not believe me. Instead, you should look at the data: www.911researchers.com...
she did a poor job because it was an ambush interview designed to discredit her. This article explains in full. Again, look at the data: janedoe0911.tripod.com...
What you need to do is look at the data.
why did he bring at least two professional video cameras, recording equipment, special lighting, and a camera crew to the National Press Club that evening and not attend Jim Fetzer's presentation?
Why did Greg Jenkins plan this interview without telling anyone who knows Judy?
Jenkins and/or his group tried to talk Judy out of going to the restroom, saying the "interview" would only take 2-3 minutes. But, Judy felt she couldn't wait. She saw the cameras for the first time after she came back from the restroom.
the people helping Jenkins felt they needed to change the lighting and camera positions. As you can see in the video, Jenkins is well lit and Judy is half in shadow for most (if not all) of the interview.
The film shows disinfo agent Jenkins' in action.
I was not deceptive. Judy never said that the beam MUST have come from space.
Steven Jones has already been shown to be a government plant put in place to distract people from Judy Wood's evidence: