AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Iran condemns Hollywood war epic


<<  1    2    3    4    5  >>



reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 04:22 PM by zerotime


Originally posted by grover
Actually... the 300 were wiped out to a man so they did not hold off the Persian army...however they made an incredibly noble and doomed stand.


The spartans did know it was a last stand. The 300 held the Persians off for 3 days, which stopped the Persian army from flooding wildly across greece. The only reason the Persians managed to break the pass in three days was because of a greek traitor told the Persians of another route around the spartans so the persians had them surrounded. The three days however allowed the remaining greeks to retreat and regroup. It also allowed the time needed for the greek navy to assemble and attack the Persian navy. This naval battle was the Battle of Salamis and it was the turning point in the war. The last stand of the 300 was vital to the entire victory.

en.wikipedia.org...




[edit on 13-3-2007 by zerotime]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 04:53 PM by beckybecky


Originally posted by zerotime
Originally posted by grover
Actually... the 300 were wiped out to a man so they did not hold off the Persian army...however they made an incredibly noble and doomed stand.


The spartans did know it was a last stand. The 300 held the Persians off for 3 days, which stopped the Persian army from flooding wildly across greece. The only reason the Persians managed to break the pass in three days was because of a greek traitor told the Persians of another route around the spartans so the persians had them surrounded. The three days however allowed the remaining greeks to retreat and regroup. It also allowed the time needed for the greek navy to assemble and attack the Persian navy. This naval battle was the Battle of Salamis and it was the turning point in the war. The last stand of the 300 was vital to the entire victory.

en.wikipedia.org...




[edit on 13-3-2007 by zerotime]


Arabs cant win wars.They are incredibly stupid.Even with a million man army and 800 ships they lost!

Amazing.

No wonder everyone looks down on them and they have to resort to suicide bombs and terrorism.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 04:56 PM by Il Papa


I find it strange that the Hollywood 1962 movie "The 300 Spartans" with Richard Egan has not been mentioned here.

That was out there before the Ayatollah Khomeini and his Islamic "enlightenment" of Persia...erm sorry Iran.

It is quite obvious that the Hollywood films are on about a place called Persia. If the wife beaters were really proud of their Persian heritige then why are they not called Persia now?

Thats like saying I am so proud of my English roots I'll call England Monkfish

If the Peaceful Persians think that this film is made to cheese them off then, thats nice. Better the movie budget was used to make some entertainment rather than turn Persia..erm Iran to glass with a similar sized fund of nuclear export.

Actually I think they should feel alarmed, as the Spartan story could give you the impression that the Persian blood line is not one of peace but one of conquer and destroy and thats the Americans job. Maybe thats the problem, jealosuy..the Yanks are where the Persians want to be...a world power.

Whatever Xerxes problems he didn't send 14 year old boys into battle against machine guns armed only with copies of the Koran



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:00 PM by Gools


I give up.

If certain people want to wallow in ignorance, so be it.
.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:17 PM by DisappearCompletely




Arabs cant win wars.They are incredibly stupid.Even with a million man army and 800 ships they lost!

Amazing.

No wonder everyone looks down on them and they have to resort to suicide bombs and terrorism.


Americans can't win wars. They are incredibly stupid. Even with all their technological advances they still lose!

Amazing.

No wonder everyone looks down on them and they have to resort to ignorance and racism.

You can do it too! Just replace a few words and you can make this statement work for any culture ever to exist.

[edit on 13-3-2007 by DisappearCompletely]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:36 PM by unknown_one


I thought Persians aren’t Arabs



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:49 PM by Blackdude


wow...America is so ignorant and racist that its just funny lol.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:49 PM by DenyAllKnowledge


Originally posted by beckybecky

Arabs cant win wars.They are incredibly stupid.Even with a million man army and 800 ships they lost!

Amazing.

No wonder everyone looks down on them and they have to resort to suicide bombs and terrorism.


Classy statement!

Persians aren't Arabs, sure they had a few Arab mercenaries but it's unlikely they featured in Xerxes army. Some estimates put the "Spartan" force at 300 Spartans (the Spartans didn't like taking too many soldiers away from the Peloponnese since they were paranoid about their slaves rebelling), about 2200 Tegeans,Mantineans and Arcadians. 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans, 1000 Phocians and more than 1000 Malisians and others. Most pro-Hellenic estimates put the force at around 7000, easily enough to defend a narrow pass (with the added protection of the hastily repaired Phocian wall) against insurmountable odds.

Some historians regard the "Greek traitor" story as myth, fabricated to make the story all the more tragic as well as the Persians appear incapable of winning a battle without the help of a renegade Greek.

All in all the last stand of Leonidas and his men was a wasted gesture, the Persians cleared the pass and the only reason the invasion failed was primarily due to mistakes the Persians made..... "Greek Valour" had little to do with it.

Anyway, the Spartans turned up too late for Platea, and were happy to ally with Persia during the Peloponnesian war.

I must say that I agree that the film has come out at a rather sensitive time, as well as looking pretty homoerotically charged (like good old fashioned fascist cinema!).



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:53 PM by 2manyquestions


I don't know why any of you continue to argue about the historical facts behind this movie for reasons I mentioned on page 1 of this thread.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 05:58 PM by beckybecky


Originally posted by DisappearCompletely
[
Americans can't win wars.

[edit on 13-3-2007 by DisappearCompletely]



Americans have won every war.

We won WW2.


In Vietnam we won again on body count.They killed 56000 Americans.We killed 5 million of them.

We won both gulf wars

In Irak we killed 600000 Terrorists while they only killed 4000 Americans.

It seems we Americans are the spartans of the 21st Century.

[edit on 13-3-2007 by beckybecky]

[edit on 13-3-2007 by beckybecky]

[edit on 13-3-2007 by beckybecky]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 06:02 PM by DenyAllKnowledge


Sorry 2manyquestions, I just like discussing real history (especially this period, I've an incurable addiction to anything related to the Greeks and Achaemenids) and opportunities to chat about Ancient Persia are few and far between!



[edit on 13-3-2007 by DenyAllKnowledge]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 06:06 PM by 2manyquestions


Originally posted by DenyAllKnowledge
Sorry 2manyquestions, I just like discussing real history (especially this period, I've an incurable addiction to anything related to the Greeks and Achaemenids) and opportunities to chat about Ancient Persia are few and far between!



[edit on 13-3-2007 by DenyAllKnowledge]


I guess I'll allow it then.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 06:35 PM by John Nada


errr...it's based on Frank Miller's fantastic graphic novel which has been around for years, I didn't hear them kicking up a stink then. It's strange how when a book or comic are translated to film it can cause such a fuss.

You can have every sexual act or blasphemous comment you want in a book/comic and no one bats an eyelid, yet Sharon Stone uncrosses her legs and someone says "F*** Jesus!" in a movie and the masses are up in arms.

Go figure!

[edit on 13-3-2007 by John Nada]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 07:56 PM by zurvan

I hope poeple listened a bit more and talked a bit less!

Some posts on this thread are quite ignorant.
Remember that history is written by victors and victors usually vilinise their enemy! Western history is based on Greek history which is seperate to Persian history. At recongnise the Persian history to to some extend.

Empires and nations did rage wars in the past hell they still do. When Russia fought Europe. When France and England fought and When Us and England were fighting( over independence) was one side necessary evil and the other good?

This is the ancient capital of Persia destroyed by Alexander.

Persepolis - Takht Jamshid - short video

Persian history and Persepolis and Alexander video with comentary

Again to people on this board who call all middle easterns Arabs well it is kinda like calling all Europians I don't know Finish!( no offence to Finland)

Iran is mainly non arab only 5% is Arab. and no don't worry there won't be any violent protests. I think what Iranians are saying is why is it that some ot the good stories don't get publicity? nothing wrong with this movie but where is the otherside to balance it out?

Storys like the book of the kings



khayyam



BTW from the first time that I saw the previews I have been interested to see the movie and will go as soon as it comes out.


[edit on 13-3-2007 by zurvan]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 08:59 PM by carnival_of_souls2047


Originally posted by beckybecky
Originally posted by DisappearCompletely
[
Americans can't win wars.

[edit on 13-3-2007 by DisappearCompletely]



Americans have won every war.

We won WW2.


In Vietnam we won again on body count.They killed 56000 Americans.We killed 5 million of them.

We won both gulf wars

In Irak we killed 600000 Terrorists while they only killed 4000 Americans.

It seems we Americans are the spartans of the 21st Century.


I concur wholeheartedly with beckybecky. The United States has won every major conflict since it's incepetion. AS for Iran believing that the movie 300 is a shot at them I just have to laugh. Next they will blame us for upcoming movie, The Invincible Ironman.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 09:03 PM by pyguy


Originally posted by zerotime
...the Graphic Novel and the Movie show how brilliant a miltiary Maneuver this battle was.

Does it? It shows how the Persians got a land force from Asia to Europe? If so, kudos to them.


Actually, it makes no mention of the bridging by the Persians, of the Hellespont straight. The creation of which, was the greatest feat of military engineering until the modern era.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 09:05 PM by RedGolem


Originally posted by Odium

The Battle of Thermopylae probably did not happen how we are told. Does anyone honestly believe that an Army of 300 people could hold off an Army of over 1,000,000?



Just because of the odds does not mean the battle and the odds of the men did not happen as it is being told. There are several examples of very few men holding off an arm through history. From the Texas rangers to Korea it has happened in one form or another.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 09:15 PM by Cthulwho


I hope they bring out a movie based on the Battle of Tours (Battle of Poiters) next, then we can point the finger and say "they started it!".



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 09:22 PM by RedGolem


Well it seems some of what Hollywood has been doing is making movies of the great historic battles and wars. So maby they will do just that.
Of coarse being the horribly violent and war like people we are they have many to chose from.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-3-2007 @ 10:20 PM by Flighty


How silly to call americans racist because of a movie. If you rent some Iranian, Bollywood, Pakistani war/action movies, they are the victors. They could be classed as racist too for all the care they show to the losers.

Why is it that the new breed of wimps always use the race card? I'm sure the Persians didn't do that hundreds of years ago.
I'm sure that would've seemed chicken-livered to the ol' guys of yore.

I'm going to see the movie. If only to put me in touch with a bit of history. I'll keep in mind that it is a DRAMATISATION and that a bit of creative license was probably employed.

But then, we don't need Iranian sympathisers to tell us something that we've already known about Hollywood movies for decades.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4    5  >>





























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.006 seconds
Page processed in 0.253 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.