It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stardust implosion not as neat as WTC 7

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 13 2007 @ 01:37 PM
link   
So I just watched on my local news the implosion of the stardust.
It was a glitzy affair with hoopla, parties, and fireworks.
THe 32 story building was brought down with 428lbs of explosives.

Watch the video
here on CNN
or here on cbs5
If you watch closely you can see what many refer to as 'squibs' in the lower left hand side.
These same 'squibs' can be seen in footage of WTC 1 and 2.

The stardust fell in 10 seconds.

Check out these other Vegas implosions, none of them are as neat as WTC 7.

There can be no doubt that WTC 7 was an implosion.
Common sense and your own eyes will tell you that.
The question of 'how they did it' is a red herring.
It does not matter 'how' they did it so dont even waste your time argueing it.
It matters why they did it though.

Why was WTC 7 'pulled' as Larry says?



posted on Mar, 13 2007 @ 08:22 PM
link   
in the second video link, they guys says "both towers fell in less than 10 seconds"... lol. was that a mistake?

thought it was interesting the ground was covered in dust like 911.



posted on Mar, 14 2007 @ 08:45 AM
link   
There were two buildings that were part of the Stardust.
The 32 story building and another smaller building.
428 lbs of explosives were all it took, and 10 seconds, a time eerily close to WTC 7.



 
2

log in

join