 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 12:05 PM by waynos
|
Well, all those RAF types I mentioned that had a fin top RWR got them at a time when the RAF were firmly dedicated to low level attack, where a threat
from below was all but impossible. Could this point to the planned operational role of the Thunder?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 03:06 PM by nemesis 11
|
i agree
i totally agree with you cant trust chinese french heck you cant trust anyone
[edit on 15-3-2007 by nemesis 11]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 03:07 PM by nemesis 11
|
the thing is a piece of crap worthless no need to discuss it any more
[edit on 15-3-2007 by nemesis 11]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 03:21 PM by Canada_EH
|
Originally posted by nemesis 11
the thing is a piece of crap worthless no need to discuss it any more
[edit on 15-3-2007 by nemesis 11] 
sigh  honestly thanks for joining and signing up and taking the time to post but honestly not a good way to introduce yourself to the forums here. If
you noticed we try to focus on figuring out the possible functions of the plane and the tech it is capable of. Thanks for adding nothin to this
dissussion.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 03:46 PM by Harlequin
|
it reminds me of a mirage/ gripen in several respects - and will of course be a very similar role IMO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 09:30 PM by peanutbutter
|
Originally posted by Harlequin
it reminds me of a mirage/ gripen in several respects - and will of course be a very similar role IMO 
Except that mirage and gripen are deltas..
It will be closer to f16's.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 09:52 PM by Daedalus3
|
Originally posted by waynos
Well, all those RAF types I mentioned that had a fin top RWR got them at a time when the RAF were firmly dedicated to low level attack, where a threat
from below was all but impossible. Could this point to the planned operational role of the Thunder? 
Yep... That's what I was thinking. The Jaguar totally fits the role, and I gues teh same goes for the Tornado and the F-4s in RAF service.
Canada_EH,
I was generalising the nozzle(s) bit for both twin-engined and single-engine a/c and the corresponding position of the RWR.
The JF-17 is single-engined-single exhaust.
However from all the info we've been getting over the past few years, it seems that the JF-17 is going to be a F-7P replacements and would
definitely have a interceptor/CAP role to play.
A closer look at the JF-17 weapons suite is in order.
Perhaps that isn't the RWR after all!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 04:43 AM by Harlequin
|
Originally posted by peanutbutter
Originally posted by Harlequin
it reminds me of a mirage/ gripen in several respects - and will of course be a very similar role IMO 
Except that mirage and gripen are deltas..
It will be closer to f16's. 
from the photo`s - meaning the front end not the back
but yes from other shots its rather `f16`ish
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 05:50 AM by RichardPrice
|
Russia blocks JF-17 engine transfer to Pakistan.
www.defenseindustrydaily.com...
Looks like China and Pakistan are going to have to seek another powerplant.
[edit on 16/3/2007 by RichardPrice]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 06:05 AM by Daedalus3
|
^^
Yep.. for now..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 09:29 PM by manlyphall
|
china's been dumping cheap and crappy weaponries to pakistan for a long time. a smart move though,a cheap price for gaining important strategic
control.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 10:28 PM by XphilesPhan
|
It looks kinda like an F-16...
What is the origin of this aircraft design? Is it a solely chinese design or is it a russian design? or is it, as it appears, an F-16 design?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2007 @ 11:03 PM by fangpaw
|
Russia did say stop, but china managed to reverse engineered the RD93 engine,
so there's nothing Russians can do now.
but oh well, J17 is no better than F20 tigershark, give them a break. India have much better options, MIG35, F18E...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2007 @ 03:03 AM by Daedalus3
|
Originally posted by fangpaw
Russia did say stop, but china managed to reverse engineered the RD93 engine,
so there's nothing Russians can do now.
but oh well, J17 is no better than F20 tigershark, give them a break. India have much better options, MIG35, F18E... 
But the reverse engineered RD-93(WS-13?) would require extensive testing with the JF-17 and the production lines for the same would be needed to be
set up.
Anyways the Chinese would have 100+ Rd-93 engines they would much rather put to use 'where ever' rather than invest in a duplicate testing and
production.
Basically this would screw up the JF-17 acquisition schedule for the PAF by a few years at least.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-3-2007 @ 11:50 PM by chinawhite
|
image source: http://bbs.cjdby.net/attachments/month_0703/20070323_df932b33ea66e42269e2oh2Sp60CJjm6.jpg
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-3-2007 @ 01:31 AM by Daedalus3
|
^^
What it is? Where it is? When it is?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-3-2007 @ 06:31 AM by sultan
|
JF-17 over Pakistan
www.youtube.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 09:17 AM by Daedalus3
|
Ahh..
national Day..
The Air Chief flies in the lead F-16 of the flypast and then scurries back of the ground parade..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 12:37 PM by Retseh
|
If I was an export customer with a modest budget, this very capable little fighter is where I would be looking to spend my money.
With a cost of just $15-$20m per copy it is incredible value. The radar is very capable with high ECCM abilities, multiple track while scan and
engagement, ground search with single vehicle lock on capabilities, and sea search with a range of over 200km. A Helmet mounted sight, full
compatibility with Western and Soviet weapons, HOTAS, 3 screen MFTS cockpit, an integrated EW suite and missile approach warning system - the list
goes on.
Stealth was not a major design consideration and thrust vectoring will likley be added as a future upgrade - but even so, it's a great little
fighter, and it deserves to do very well.
The Chinese certainly used to make "crap", but much like the Japanese car making industry during the 1970s, they are upgrading very quickly, and
this aircraft is a sign of that.
It looks to be a better bet than the Indian HAL Tejas - it will be VERY interesting to see these 2 in combat against each other - interesting and
likely.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 12:45 PM by Canada_EH
|
Originally posted by fangpaw
Russia did say stop, but china managed to reverse engineered the RD93 engine,
so there's nothing Russians can do now.
but oh well, J17 is no better than F20 tigershark, give them a break. India have much better options, MIG35, F18E... 
Shows how little you know about the F-20. A plane that would wipe the floor with the F-16 easier to maintain etc. And Chuck Yeager (im not american
but I respect the guy) said it was one of his favourite jet fighters he ever flew. Basically a extremely capable plane that got the axe like most
fighters ahead of their time.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |