It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Likely British Sucessor to Blair Calls for NWO Fight on Global Warming

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:
RR

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 09:39 AM
link   
Looks like they are not even trying to keep this stuff hidden anymore:

Gordon Brown, likely to be the next prime minister, will deliver a speech calling for a "new world order" to combat global warming on Monday.

Taken from HERE

And they'll bring this "New World Order" under the guise that it's for all of our "benefit".




posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 11:06 AM
link   
This is rediculous.

There are two types of NWO: -

The first one which is what he was referring to: -
en.wikipedia.org...



New world order, a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and thought of the balance of power among nations

Perhaps Gordon Brown was hoping for new political thought on global warming? Seems more likely than making hints about the existence of a secret group planning to take over the world.


The second one in my opinion he was not referring to: -
]en.wikipedia.org...(conspiracy)



New World Order (Novus Ordo Mundi) refers to a conspiracy in which a powerful and secretive group is claimed to be planning to eventually rule the world via an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign states and other checks and balances in world power struggles.



It is almost laughable to sugget he was referring to the conspiracy NWO. People try and use anything these days to support their NWO theories.

[edit on 12-3-2007 by Sceptical_Alien]

[edit on 12-3-2007 by Sceptical_Alien]



posted on Mar, 13 2007 @ 10:50 AM
link   
www.guardian.co.uk...

This is a British article about it.




A Tory Government would have "no credibility, no influence and no achievements" within the EU, he will say. "Let us also be clear: only a government fully committed to the UK's role in Europe can show such leadership. Euro-scepticism and continent-wide environmental action are at odds with each other.

"A government ambivalent about the UK's future in Europe and allied to the most reactionary forces in the European Parliament would have no credibility, no influence and no achievements."


There is more at the link, but the whole article is rather vague to me.



posted on Mar, 13 2007 @ 11:04 AM
link   
This is an easy win for these guys. The media has all of the sheep freaked out and begging for the government(s) to save them from the super-typhoons and swelling seas that promise to kill their children.

This guy just isnt trying to hide anything or kid anyone.

Look at the recent suggestions for stopping GW; tax, redistribute wealth, and regulate. Its global socialism any way you look at it.

The smoking gun that everyone just seems to overlook is; how exactly will fines and taxation help the environment? IT WONT! Money barely means anything to each of the countries. You open that up globally and money means even less. How many nations are in dire debt? How many of them seem concerned?

Tax the US all you want. Regulate it all you want. Same for China and the EU. It wont make any difference to anyone. Especially not the environment. Youll just get alot of "money" funneled into developing nations that sell their "carbon-credits" off. Sooner or later this new money coming into the developing nations will allow them to develop and industrialize.

This is great for globalisation. More industrial countries, if you believe what you preach, will only mean more pollution and more CO2.

This is NWO globalisation bull and nothing else.




top topics
 
0

log in

join