It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GWB, Their Pet Goat

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 02:48 PM
link   

George W. Bush, Their Pet Goat





George W. Bush, that pathetic manchild. Several independent reports (most notably, the
Complete 9/11 Timeline) suggest that Bush had no involvement in plotting 9/11 and that indeed he was a target of the conspirators--if he did not join their cabal and become its cheerleader, then he would be disposed of.

There was no downside: assassinating Bush on 9/11 would have even further demoralized America and installed a likely active conspirator in power. In any event, it was seen to it that Bush was publicly humiliated and made to feel the full extent of his superfluousness and expendability that morning. Shock and Awe indeed.

Look anew at those infamous nine minutes in the Florida classroom. Think about why the President was set amid first-graders, reading "The Pet Goat," when he learned of the second jet hitting the second WTC tower. Ponder the paramount importance of stagecraft in the modern presidency, and consider Bush's 9/11 stage. This was no coincidence; Bush was set up for a degrading pantomime that would make it clear to anyone with a functioning brain that he was a powerless puppet.

Ponder his immobility, his rising discomfort, the fear and dumbfoundment on his face, as the minutes painfully tick by. Think also about why his handlers, in flagrant contravention of all Secret Service emergency protocols, purposefully left the President of the United States publicly exposed for over 40 minutes after the gravest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor. Consider why he then pointlessly wandered across the nation in Air Force One for the rest of the day.

All this was no coincidence. Bush was the patsy, the pet goat, and soon enough he would be given his ultimatum--when Air Force One was in the air, denied fighter escort for nearly two hours: Become chief cheerleader for the 9/11 cabal or become another among thousands of victims of that brilliant mastermind in an Afgan cave.

Bush was eventually flown to Offutt AFB in Nebraska, home of the US Strategic Command and also operational center for Global Guardian--the most important of the astounding 20-odd "war games" exercises, organized by the Pentagon and other governmental organizations, that were held on that most coincidence-laden morning. (Global Guardian anticipated a Russian nuclear strike and raised US military alert status to DEFCON 3; all strategic nuclear weapons were at hair-trigger readiness. And yes, this occurred before the WTC was struck.)

It is no surprise that the first foreign leader to speak with Bush after the attacks was Russia's President Putin, as Russia was well aware of the sudden and threatening change in US force posture. Apparently Bush informed him that the Strangelovians were now in control and that the PNAC agenda was going to be implemented, and that if Russia didn't accede to America's Middle Eastern agenda, then Global Guardian, fair warning, would no longer be a game.

In yet another set of absurdities and coincidences to add to an already overflowing basket, Warren Buffett, one of the richest men in the world and someone who soon became disconcertingly interested in "loose nukes," was also at Offutt that day, hosting a "charity benefit" with business leaders, a number of whom otherwise would have been working in the WTC.

I can't think of any location more conducive to charity, or a more congenial setting for the Morgan of our day to host a power breakfast, than the US Strategic Command HQ in eastern Nebraska--except perhaps Windows on the World.

What on earth did they all talk about when the Pet Goat made his courtesy call?


[edit on 11-3-2007 by gottago]




posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 04:05 PM
link   
Very interesting theory. But that's just it. It's a theory of your's. You provided no links that support the meat of your story- Bush's life being threatened, Bush threatening Russia, Bush's staff setting him up to look like a "pathetic idiot manchild." By the way, such comments really undermine any credibility you expect to have on here. If you want anyone to buy into your completely unsubstantiated theory, then at least pretend to be impartial.

Obviously without someone coming forward and providing testimony and/or documented evidence, it's basically impossible to prove any of your allegations. But including a link or two of sites that back up what you're saying, or at least providing more details, would go a long way towards getting this theory any attention.

You may also want to spare us the immature and pointless namecalling that you began this thread with next time you grace us with your far-out conspiracies.



posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 04:26 PM
link   
Rasputin13 (well chosen pseudo btw),

This piece was obviously posted to spark debate. Just about everything on here is a conspiracy theory; if you haven't noticed yet, it's actually a conspiracy-theory website.

If you have a problem with that, may I suggest you hop over to Pravda's forum, or Good Housekeeping's?

The facts stated are facts; use your internet tubes and check them out yourself if you don't trust me. And yes, the speculation is speculation.

As for my characterization of W, that's certainly the least-debatable point, but what would you prefer? "Eloquent, farsighted leader, fearless defender of the Constitution and Peacemaker"?

Instead of howling bloody murder, I don't like Johnny, I don't want to play, just pass on by or add something valid to the debate. Sick of babysitting here.


[edit on 11-3-2007 by gottago]



posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 06:03 PM
link   
VERY interesting theory, Gottago. I had never thought of that. I have, howver, always wondered why the Secret Service didn't immediately sweep him up and get him out of harm's way. I've also wondered about the unescorted Airforce One for 2 hours. Both of these things are in blatant disregard for long-established (and sensible) procedures for protecting the U.S. President.
I'll have to think on this one and get back to you later about whether I think your theory might be correct or not. But thanks for the "brain food" to chew over.



posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 06:18 PM
link   
First, I don't believe Bush is the idiot he pretends, or at least pretended in the early days.
Second: I think this theory is at least partly right anyway. It doesn't seem like Bush personally was in on it. You can basically see him deciding to be in on it right there on camera. It looks like he had hints and he's thinking "holy #, that's what nCeheney meant. New pearl Harbor... Shoulda read that book by my Dad's friend a little closer.

The thing about seeing the attack on TV is BS. He didn't see it on TV, no one did. He prob. did not have a secret camera system pointing at the WTC for his own verification as some have deduced. Likely he just made up the story about seing the firstplane hit on advice of Karl Rove, to give him an eberyman flavor - like the average American he learned of the attacks on the teevee.



posted on Mar, 11 2007 @ 08:21 PM
link   


This piece was obviously posted to spark debate. Just about everything on here is a conspiracy theory; if you haven't noticed yet, it's actually a conspiracy-theory website.


That's just it. It's a conspiracy website. If I want to read senseless Bush-bashing then I'll check out the PTS forum. Name-calling doesn't spark the kind of constructive debate that makes this site great. In fact, it's already distracting from the intended discussion. I pointed it out as kindly as possible, and you responded with sarcasm and ignorance. Now I'm pointing that out, and you'll probably come back with more of the above.



If you have a problem with that, may I suggest you hop over to Pravda's forum, or Good Housekeeping's?


Why would I go to Pravda's forum? You provided me with enough complete nonsense posed as fact right here!



The facts stated are facts; use your internet tubes and check them out yourself if you don't trust me. And yes, the speculation is speculation.


And the sky is the sky! And the ocean is the ocean! What's your point? Re-read your post. The entire thing reads like a statement of fact, when in reality I can count the facts containted therein on one hand. And those have nothing to do with your conspiracy! I was never questioning your integrity, so it's not a matter of trust. To be perfectly honest I'm just fed up with political bickering and name-calling. And judging by the recent crackdown on that stuff by ATS mods, a lot of other people were sick of it too. Your first sentence, which you've since strangely edited, completely undermined anything else you had to say after.



As for my characterization of W, that's certainly the least-debatable point, but what would you prefer? "Eloquent, farsighted leader, fearless defender of the Constitution and Peacemaker"?


Actually, I'd prefer that you follow the rules around here, as well as the rules of common decency, and keep the lame name-calling and political bickering in the forum where it belongs.



Instead of howling bloody murder, I don't like Johnny, I don't want to play, just pass on by or add something valid to the debate. Sick of babysitting here.


Well you must have found something to my argument. You did remove the word "idiot" from your Bush adjective. Not that it really changed things when you leave "pathetic" and "manchild" in. And for the record, I wasn't howling bloody murder. I was giving you friendly advice on how to objectively present a conspiracy on here- especially when it isn't backed up by squat. Beginning your post with Bush-bashing rather than just introducing your theory only turns people off- especially those who are just looking for interesting conspiracy debate and not MoveOn.com rhetoric. Clearly, I'm not the one here with his panties in a bunch. Just recognize your inability to post anything fair and accurate without injecting it with your Bush hatred. And forgive me for trying to educate you in the art of distinguishing your theory from the facts.



posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:13 AM
link   
R13, I obviously hit a nerve with a sledgehammer here, so I take your tirade as a compliment and a vindication.

I reconsidered and agreed with an earlier poster; W indeed is no idiot, and so I make you a gift of the word I deleted.

You may rant all you want that the post is a political smear, but you know that's a cover for your own smearing.

But if this post is a political smear, then all the 9/11 board is one big smear, and the black-ops board, too, and on and on, because the premise of all of them is that governments lie, misinform, withhold information, and perpetrate all manner of unlawful and immoral acts. Well, GWB just happens to be the head of the US government, so it's all about politics, and ultimately he is responsible as Chief Executive.

And just why isn't his role in 9/11 a valid topic for discussion here? Smells mighty un-American to me, Rasputin, at least the America I love.

I want to speak on that here, to you, because I see so many people on this site have lost sight of what the true meaning of 9/11 is while worrying about the minutia of all the incredible events of that day. Let's cut to the heart of the matter for once.

I believe 9/11 is an inside job. I came to this conclusion after reading a poll that shocked me, stating some 40% of the public thought likewise, and after weeks of research and critical thinking. I will not rehash those arguments again here, but for an educated mind applying logic this result is inescapable. The evidence is overwhelming, and a great deal of it is presented here on this site, to be debated and furthered.

I don't know your personal opinion on 9/11, but if you even suspect that the government had anything to do with it, then you had better feel like me and believe that this is then the most important issue facing this country, and by extension all of us here on this blue earth, because that means that men of true evil---true unmitigated evil--are in control of America.

And if you have become convinced of that, and if you are a true patriot, then you should be doing anything and everything you can to spread the word and convince your fellow citizens of this, if not you are complicit in their evil, and you are allowing traitors to control our--at least my--country and threaten us and the world.

If they are capable of these atrocities, then they are truly capable of anything. I personally think, as I state earlier, after much reflection, that George W. Bush was not a plotter, but he did accede to the conspirators to retain his life and power. I frankly pity the man, as I do anyone who must sell his soul for power.

But he is part of this and I really don't give the slightest damn about the niceties of politics--if such a thing even exists in the tawdry, debased political climate this man and his handlers have been instrumental in creating--because the implications of 9/11, if you believe as I do, are fundamentally about the survival of America.

You call yourself Rasputin, adviser to the last Russian tsar. Rasputin was a mystic, an occultist, and a manipulator, murdered because of his poisonous influence over Nicolas, Alexandra, and their family by a young aristocrat who did so to save Russia from his evil, enveloping influence. It didn't help in the end, though, and the tsar and the white Russians fell to the Bolsheviks. Sad story, bringing untold trouble and suffering to the world for most of the last century.

Let's not let the likes of it happen again.

[edit on 12-3-2007 by gottago]



posted on Mar, 14 2007 @ 06:53 AM
link   
anyone seen a pic of him with that book upside down?

So dumb...



posted on Mar, 14 2007 @ 10:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tokyo Rose
anyone seen a pic of him with that book upside down?

So dumb...


I'm no fan of W's, but that image has been proven to be Photoshopped.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join