Originally posted by Griff
I would vote for Guilliani over Clinton in a heart beat.

ROFL, the irony.
Giuliani was the guy that physically secured the structural documents, etc., from what I understand. It was his office specifically that made sure
all of those things were "preserved" -- under lock and key. Maybe with your vote you can ask
him for the plans. You'd probably have better
luck with that than with the Port Authority; the PA just sounds like a bunch of asses to me.
Voting for one or the other is like voting in a mascot for the mob. And considering this guy's bunker with the OEM and FEMA in WTC7 and all of that
mess, I can't see how he wouldn't have been involved on some level. And you'd vote him in anyway? I mean it's going to be one or the other, but
why even honor them? I would think that the least you can do is abstain as a conscientious objector to the whole system. I want to see it all
collapse, either from them wiping themselves out or from mass civil unrest, but we need to rebuild from the ground up. It's too eat up from the
inside already, there's no hope in playing their game and trying to win.