Originally posted by your_evidence
nice theory, very entertaining and humorous. But doesn't comply with certain laws of physics.
Your right and wrong, laws of physics only describe what we have seen, and how it is relative to us. Besides, we dont even truly
own planet, how can we be sure we know anything about space and other celestial bodies? Truth is, all we can do for now is speculate.
Originally posted by redseal
pregnant? well who it the universe is the father?? Explain this to me, how will it evolve another planet??
Fathers may not be needed. There is a thread posted very recently that is about new animals. One of such animals is a lizard that repopulates through
cloning, males are unnecessary. Leiolepis ngovantrii is the scientific name. if your
Originally posted by Johnmike
This makes no sense at all. How does whatever the sun spits out get propelled into orbit?
Why exactly do they move farther and farther away from the sun?
There are plenty of theory's that incorporate a expanding universe. Im sure you've heard of The Big Bang, for example. If the universe may be
expanding, why not the solar system?
Originally posted by Long Lance
these articles are from 2003, no matter what kind of theory you proposed, the concept is the same and this thread is therefore not original.
how hard can a search for 'planet birthing' be?
credit where it's due, pls. add some unverifiable spin and call it enlightened, funny isn't it? NOT.
Off topic: I miss the days where people could talk about epiphanies or speculations without necessarily having a source. I too, have considered this
thought process the OP brings to the table and it was not from that site or any website for that matter. Lets get back to talking to people for the
sake of philosophical speculation, instead of trying to prove everyone a "impostor", cheater, fabricator, disinfo agent, ect.
ps: thank you for posting those links, they will indeed add some information.
Originally posted by Lexion
Snowman, the acronym is actually KISS, but I digress.
Does noone else see what Sleeper is doing ? This is another point farm.
I'm actually shocked the mods aren't on to this.
Sadly, I'm adding to his farming by trying to point out the obvious.
A point farm? im not familiar with this term. If it has anything to do with the numbers below his sn, i doubt this being his intentions. Why would he
post an idea he wishes to talk about, in an attempt to get pseudo points? I dont know, maybe im too new to ATS, or maybe your too worried about
Originally posted by Smack
Lets be clear -- what Sleeper has put forward is not entirely his own theory. It shares many of the characteristics of a body of scholarly work, known
as the Electric Universe theory or Plasma Cosmology.
There does exist a body of credible, peer reviewed work on Plasma Cosmology theory. I suggest some of you take the time to educate yourselves on the
topic. ...or you could just assume you know better and place any debate outside the scope of the status quo into the 'skunk works' pile.
Whatever makes you feel more comfortable.
[edit on 11-3-2007 by Smack]
I havent had a chance to read up on this theory, but i have speculated on the possibility of it. Thanks, and i foresee reading in my future.
Originally posted by DarkSide
Why are the outermost planets gaseous and the innermost telluric? Are the telluric and gas planets from....hmmm...different fathers?
It could be possible that they are not necessarily gas only, We have never been to jupiter, and its entirely possible there is terrain underneath the
gaseous surface. Someone here posted a link to a website that attempts to describe the earths surface below the atmosphere and photosphere, and the
sun was once thought to be a ball of flame... We just dont have enough information on it to really come to a sound theory, as with almost all things
Do we know everything about the moon, the closest thing to us? Do we know everything about the Earth? Id say no, scientists cant really be 100%
percent sure on things like hurricane paths, volcano eruption predictions, tornado and when they will occur. We also have a area of unknown in the
percentage of 90% ( Nat. Geo.
) of the ocean floor. Are we not
still finding new species (that in all probability, were already there waiting to be discovered.) So until we know about ourselves and our home, is it
safe to say we are talking out of our ass when it comes to galactic science?
edit on 24-5-2011 by derst1988 because: (no reason