It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarkSide
Funny theory, but I don't buy it.
I don't see how a star can be "pregnant", and how these planets would form inside the star would defy gravity, them exiting the star would also defy gravity. And all the planets moving exactly 1 orbit away also defies physics.
The Earth moving to Mars orbit would also make all life go extinct and Earth would turn into a dead planet.
[edit on 18-6-2007 by DarkSide]
Originally posted by DarkSide
Funny theory, but I don't buy it.
I don't see how a star can be "pregnant", and how these planets would form inside the star would defy gravity, them exiting the star would also defy gravity. And all the planets moving exactly 1 orbit away also defies physics.
The Earth moving to Mars orbit would also make all life go extinct and Earth would turn into a dead planet.
they are burped out
A new planet will not bump other planets out of their orbits; all planets are in constant motion, moving slowly outward away from the sun like a ripple in a lake. This orbit will elongate by the gravitational forces of other planets as each swim across the solar system
Originally posted by DarkSide
they are burped out
How?
Why are the outermost planets gaseous and the innermost telluric? Are the telluric and gas planets from....hmmm...different fathers?
Originally posted by Johnmike
You also didn't answer Johnmike's question. How would the planet get into orbit? How much energy would it take to force out an object with a decent sized mass, say comparable to Mercury, into a circular orbit around the Sun? I would imagine that it would have to shoot the thing out fairly hard, so that it just doesn't fall back into the Sun itself.
What about the present theory that our moon was produced by our own earth?
caused by a huge comet hitting the earth while it was in a molten stage. Dont u think that if that happened on the sun that they may happen also. and considering the size of the sun i would say that it could produce a planet in the same aspect the earth produced our moon. Just a thought.
Originally posted by PPLwakeUP
Hello Sleeper,
First of all I want to thank you for great posts at ATS and your great blog.
Lately I am very interested in the birth/history of planets etc and I came across the theory that the earth is growing. have you heard of it?
If you believe this theory you automatically also have to believe that the earth is hollow. With hollow earth I don't mean about some lost tribes of Israel who still wander somewhere below our feet but about an earth that is semi hollow because it's growing larger in size due to volcanic activity thus leaving giant caves, holes etc.
Originally posted by PPLwakeUP
Hello Sleeper,
Did you watch the shows ?
I did fixed the links they work now.
As you say the planets collect space dust, debris over the billions of years but that is on the surface of earth. In case of the theory of Neal Adams the earth more or less inflates itself with the volcanos as it's tool to do so.
In your theory how do you think the planets grow? From the outside or from the inside?
And if it's from the inside what causes it?
Originally posted by russ1969
And this is why most theories never get very far. i see alot of people making jokes about the sun producing a planet. Is it so far fetched ? I dont think so.
Look how many people laughed at the idea the earth was round. And all they had to do is look at the moon and see that it was round. it was right in front of them and they couldnt see the truth. And when people say 'that defies the laws of physics' i would ask them, do you know how the laws of physics in space work? prob not.
following mainstream science is not always the best way to get answers. In a hundred years from now im sure they will be saying 'Man they didnt know anything back then' Remember its only been around fifty years since we have been in space exploration.