It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FredT
Hmmm you are incorrect about a few things.
The US's SLBM the Trident D-5 has counterforce ability. that is the ability to target the other sides Silo based missiles. Its CEP is less than 120 meters. yes they still can be used for "city busting" but are as accurate as thier land based firends. Given the superior state of the US SSBN's thier ability to be targeted is remote.
Using nuclear tipped ABM's would be a foolhardy proposition at best. You (depending on where they aere intercepted) EMP your own territory, and the effects may be as bad as the incomming missiles landing at any rate. Less upfront destruction but the fallout would be ugly.
You do not win a all out exchange you deal with the aftermath and thats about it.
The Russians may have more warheads, but how many are deliverable? And at the numbers you posted, we are taking about bouncing the rubble even half tahn number is enuf to wipe out both countries.
[edit on 3/8/07 by FredT]
Originally posted by The_Investor
I'm not sure how you get-off telling me I'm wrong when I pull this stratight from the book on "US National Security" for 2006-2007.
Because some of your comments are flawed IMHO. And If you are, using a book for a reference you are not citing your sources which is required here at ATS.
SLBMs have very little if any counterforce capability considering their lack of ability to know their exact position without exposing themselves to attack.
The CEP of the D-5 is almost the same as its land based counterpart the LGM-30 Minuteman III
www.globalsecurity.org...
www.globalsecurity.org...
A CEP of 120 meters for a D-5 indicates that the SSBN's are using inertial navigation to position themselves and how exposed do you need to be to extend an antenna and get a GPS fix eh?
Also the D-5 has a reported range of 7360 km. The Minuteman III is greater than that at 11000 km, but are silo located in the central US. And no, they do not need to sit right off the coast to hold most targets in Russia at risk. Did you forget that missiles can be launched from the Pole, the Pacific, etc?
The ten Trident submarines which originally operated out of Sub-Base Kings Bay in Georgia
were all loaded with the Trident-2 missiles, also known as D-5. Trident-2s have the accuracy and
quick delivery time necessary to decapitate underground command posts, as well as demolishing silos.
www.plrc.org...
As for winning a Nuclear engagement it's of course possible Russia prepares for it and the use of Nukes in the upper-atmosphere to intercept ICBMs etc. is not going to have any harmful effects save minute amounts
Sure thing. Scattering weapons grade plutonium in the upper atmosphere will be okay? Unless the Russians are going to deploy the nuclear tipped ABM's such large numbers that they are going to have one for each warhead, you are looking at area type effects that will cause physical damage to the incomming missiles and NOT total destruction. Thus lots of aerisolized weapons grade material in the atmoshpere.
Originally posted by Connected
Honestly, I don't see any supporting links or proof of these numbers, you may be entirely incorrect.
Originally posted by The_Investor
Originally posted by Connected
Honestly, I don't see any supporting links or proof of these numbers, you may be entirely incorrect.
Sarkesian "US National Security"