It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And that had NOTHING to do with Operation Bojinka, which is what I was talking about. Wave two of Operation Bojinka was never passed on to the FAA until much later.
FAA developed the crew member security training guidance,
referred to as Common Strategy I, in the early 1980's in response to
numerous hijacking incidents in the late 1970's. Common Strategy I
generally instructed air carriers to develop training programs that
called for flight and cabin crew members to cooperate with threatening
passengers or hijackers and slow compliance with their demands. Based
on this guidance, FAA also developed corresponding security training
standards that set forth the requirements for flight and cabin crew
member security training.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
On the contrary, flight crews had plans for if they were hijacked. It's well documented. You give the hijacker whatever they want, get the plane on the ground, try to keep everyone alive, and let them negotiate, or as a last resort storm the plane. But you don't give the hijackers an excuse to kill passengers.
[edit on 4/6/2007 by Zaphod58]
Originally posted by Zaphod58
At least if you do that, then there's a chance you can get it back later. If you were a pilot of a plane, and someone came in holding a knife to your throat, you're telling me that you wouldn't give up control of that plane?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Pilots, even with military police training, are responsible for keeping the lives of their passengers and crew safe. If someone is threatening that, or their, or their crews' life, they're going to do whatever they want. I've known several pilots, most of them military that have said they would have given up control of a plane in that situation.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
which would have been the DUMBEST choice they could have made.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
So you think that trying to unstrap from your seat, while the hijacker holds the advantage, and trying to fight them in that tiny little area, where you can EASILY cause major problems, or even to crash is a good idea? Then I'm glad you aren't a pilot.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And how long do you think it takes you to unstrap, stand up, turn around, and get away from the control yoke so that you CAN fight? And what do you think the hijackers are going to be doing during that time? Standing there waiting for you to do all that?
Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Paul Takemoto acknowledged Thursday that flight crews have been authorized to carry firearms for the past 20 years.
"That will change on November 14," he said. "The new rule will not include authorization (to carry firearms) and crew members will no longer be allowed to carry arms."
Federal Aviation Regulation 108.11 currently allows armed individuals on aircraft, "if the person having the weapon is authorized to have the weapon by the (airline) and the Administrator (of the FAA) and has successfully completed a course of training in the use of firearms acceptable to the Administrator."
Takemoto ""was not aware of whether or not the FAA had ever approved a firearms training course for flight crews, or whether such a request had ever been made"". He indicated that the agency was too busy to research the issue in light of the on-going investigation into the hijacking of four passenger jets by terrorists armed with plastic knives and box cutters on September 11.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by LeftBehind
So what is your counter theory?
[edit on 5-4-2007 by LeftBehind]
Weel not sure but it is also strange that out of 4 planes not 1 person got off an emergency call or an emergency signal. Other hijaked aircraft have gotten off a call or signal.
As soon as the intruder enters he can reach right over and slit your throat,