lawsuit to halt WTC7 investigation

go, ed. another true patriot steps forward. (link to article)

Specifically, Information Item No. 1 fails to comply with applicable information quality guidelines and standards in a number of particular ways, including, but not limited to inclusion of the following demonstrably false statement found at page 11 of Information Item No. 1:

 

“NIST is analyzing scenarios for the event that initiated the collapse of WTC 7. As a part of this work, NIST is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST will estimate the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements as a result of blast.” (Bold emphasis added)

 

Requester asserts that the quoted information is demonstrably false and misleading and must be corrected, together with other information that, at present, also contains false and misleading statements.  Said information is false in and as a result of the following particulars:

 

NIST’s NCSTSAR 1 report, issued in or about the month of October 2005, contains the following statement that must be deemed applicable to the ongoing investigation of what caused the 6.6-second destruction of WTC building 7 and to Information Item No. 1:

 

“NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.” (Bold emphasis added)

 

It is to be noted that NCSTAR 1 repeats the above quoted phrase in no fewer than three widely separated passages of that document; namely:  pgs xxxvii, 146, and 176, respectively. 

the purpose of this lawsuit is to halt another misleading conclusion from NIST. to halt NIST from issuing another AUTHORITATIVE CONCLUSION based on an inadequate investigation.

may god bless the truth, ed haas and jerry leaphart, and put an end to the Great Farce.

[edit on 6-3-2007 by billybob]

ROFL!


Let's bring the Twin Tower report back into this, too. How can you give WTC trusses 2 hours of intense heat, and then declare that that's how the towers actually fell when your experiments showed that they don't collapse at all? How is it that NIST reaches its conclusions, exactly, if not by science?

Originally posted by bsbray11
ROFL!


Let's bring the Twin Tower report back into this, too. How can you give WTC trusses 2 hours of intense heat, and then declare that that's how the towers actually fell when your experiments showed that they don't collapse at all? How is it that NIST reaches its conclusions, exactly, if not by science?

ed seems pretty savvy. he purposely is keeping the focus of his lawsuit very pointed and narrow. it is only one detail about the quality of information. however, if he wins, then it is the perfect lynchpin and WILL force a re-examination of the quality of the information from the first popish NISTian declaration.

gee, nistian rhymes with christian, LOL! you HAVE to have FAITH to believe in it.

[edit on 6-3-2007 by billybob]

The Official Story is collapsing at free-fall speed.