posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 08:06 AM
Errr... Conrad is someone who can't tell a strange looking rock from a fossil. The Smithsonian is absolutely correct, here.
His "skull microphoto" (www.edconrad.com...
)looks nothing like real bone, by the way. You couldn't walk and hold
your head up if your skull was of material that dense. Human bone looks like sponge.
His skull/cranium (www.edconrad.com...
) is far too thick to be a real skull and it shows no features like the growth sutures
and plate joinings. The thickness of bone in your skull is 1/4 inch or less; the only animals with skulls as thick as the one he's holding up are
massive creatures like the elephant.
His "lung" is only convincing if you don't know human anatomy (it's missing the lobes and other features); the "embryos" are simply iron nodules
The only person covering up stuff is Ed, who wants to cover up the truth and promote himself as a great researcher with great finds. He hasn't
bothered to learn basic anatomy (so he could actually identify things.) Heck, you don't have to be a paleontologist or a scientist to see this --
any rock hound who does fossil hunting can tell you the same thing.