This topic is in the Katrina Conspiracies Discussion discussion forum.  (rss)


proof of Weather Manipulation at katrina and ophelia.




Topic started on 5-3-2007 @ 09:42 PM by CrimsonSaberACTUAL


Has anybody checked these out?





This is a "snapshot" from a loop that appeared on the NOLA NEXRAD on 18 August 2005...

more than a WEEK PRIOR to Katrina having made landfall.

These "bands" are NOT normal. I actually "snagged" the original loop... which is on a laptop that "fried" outta nowhere. I'm trying to salvage the HD now... but can still convey some of this.

I did a WIDE search online, and the only place I could find the same loop was... well... ahem... it was actually on Hoagland's website.

Here's a link so you can see the "loop" in motion, to see what I'm talking about. Also... look at the storm track... then go ask ANY CAT Adjuster how many hurricanes they've heard of that move in a STRAGHT LINE FOR MORE THAN 300 MILES. See what they say...

Here's the link to RC Hoagland's site: (scroll down til you see the loop... can't miss it.)

The EnterpriseMission: Captain's Blog


Here's some more supporting evidence. I was simply astonished to see RC Hoagland had ALL this imagery. I thought he was the "mars" guy... LOL...

This is from Ophelia. This storm was anticipated to RAGE and then impact the east coast near DC or NYC. Instead... it just petered out, and then drifted off into the ocean...

Or did it?




There are more. But this is enough for me to know that we've been manipulated... just as the weather.

What say You?


CSa

[edit on 5-3-2007 by CrimsonSaberACTUAL]

[edit on 5-3-2007 by CrimsonSaberACTUAL]

[edit on 5-3-2007 by CrimsonSaberACTUAL]


MOD EDIT:CAP TITLE

[edit on 6/15/2007 by kinglizard]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-3-2007 @ 03:38 PM by CoraX


i agree the red spikes are suspicious. their completely locked and synced with the hurricane.. interesting thought though, weather control, also scary.. say if a terrorist group got their hands on that thing.. the "war on terrorism" has heated up things a bit so i wouldnt be supprised if that happened. nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. the nukes and all were scary enough, now this. nature should be left alone and not be controlled by us ESPECIALLY the weather



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-3-2007 @ 05:13 PM by billybob


ummmm...uhhhh....

terrorists do have the technology and did(do) use it. you should be scared of the action and the actor and the motivations of the director, not the camera and the screen and technologies' 'realism'.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-3-2007 @ 05:47 PM by CrimsonSaberACTUAL



Originally posted by billybob
ummmm...uhhhh....

terrorists do have the technology and did(do) use it. you should be scared of the action and the actor and the motivations of the director, not the camera and the screen and technologies' 'realism'.


I hate to do it, just cuz of the implications, but I concur utterly with this statement.

Then Defense Secretary William Cohen WARNED of this in 1997. But we were too busy with Girls Gone Wild, the Superbowl, and American Idol to give a damn. yikes. mommy.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-3-2007 @ 05:52 PM by deessell



Originally posted by CrimsonSaberACTUAL

Originally posted by billybob
ummmm...uhhhh....

terrorists do have the technology and did(do) use it. you should be scared of the action and the actor and the motivations of the director, not the camera and the screen and technologies' 'realism'.


I hate to do it, just cuz of the implications, but I concur utterly with this statement.

Then Defense Secretary William Cohen WARNED of this in 1997. But we were too busy with Girls Gone Wild, the Superbowl, and American Idol to give a damn. yikes. mommy.


Which terrorists would these be? The ones in the White House or the ones that are 'throwing stones' or the ones that live in caves in Afghanistan? Maybe that is a retorical question.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-3-2007 @ 08:55 PM by billybob


whitehouse - 1
islamofascists - 0



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-3-2007 @ 02:28 PM by mikellmikell


Actually those bands are called Rain Bands. Where the warm air picks up moisture and drops it in bands. Rather common near the water even here in the Great Lakes.

mikell



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-3-2007 @ 03:14 PM by Nemithesis


This furthers my hypothesis that Crop Circle technology has advanced to the point where they can use it to manipulate precipitation... on a large scale!

Pretty wild.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 04:38 PM by roadgravel


I have a contact that works for NOAA with rain and radars. Banding is a very common occurance. It does not have to be associated with rain.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 01:26 AM by NovusOrdoMundi



Originally posted by mikellmikell
Actually those bands are called Rain Bands. Where the warm air picks up moisture and drops it in bands. Rather common near the water even here in the Great Lakes.

mikell


True, but they don't only show up on one side, and they don't only stay aligned with the eye in one particular spot, only to fade out and give birth to a new rain band. Also, look at the hurricane before it shifts direction - no "rain bands" to be seen. Then, all of a sudden, as it shifts direction, there are the "rain bands".

It could also be false radar signatures. You'd have to compare it to other suspected 'manipulated' storms to see if this same signature, or another odd signature, showed up.

So, I'd say it's weird, but until further research is done, it could be labeled as false radar signatures coupled with coincidence. However, at some point, you have to draw a line in the sand at what is coincidence and what is not.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 06:40 AM by Essan


Only just seen this, but as far as the radar images of Ophelia goes it shows a well known glitch in the processing .... Similar effects appear all the time (I remember the image being raised before and I soon found similar examples)

Of course the great thing with these weather manipulation theories is that no-one knows how they do it nor why whatever it is they do produces the results we see ...... But then, that's witchcraft for you



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 12:11 PM by NovusOrdoMundi



Originally posted by Essan
Only just seen this, but as far as the radar images of Ophelia goes it shows a well known glitch in the processing .... Similar effects appear all the time (I remember the image being raised before and I soon found similar examples)

Of course the great thing with these weather manipulation theories is that no-one knows how they do it nor why whatever it is they do produces the results we see ...... But then, that's witchcraft for you


Weather manipulation is very possible. Whether or not they could actually guide or steer the systems they create is another story. But I truly believe that it is possible to create storm systems.

To base the whole counter argument on "no-one knows how they do it" is irrelevant. Just because we, the average people, don't know the step by step process, doesn't mean they don't know how to do it. I think it goes without saying that they have hired, and have the ability to continue to hire, pretty much the smartest people on the planet.

If Tesla figured out that similar things were possible, then what have today's scientists figured out is possible?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-6-2007 @ 05:39 AM by Essan



Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi

To base the whole counter argument on "no-one knows how they do it" is irrelevant. Just because we, the average people, don't know the step by step process, doesn't mean they don't know how to do it.


But when the people who say it can be done are not experts in meteorology or specifically tropical cyclones, whereas those who say it can't be done are, one has to wonder ....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-6-2007 @ 02:42 PM by NovusOrdoMundi



Originally posted by Essan

Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi

To base the whole counter argument on "no-one knows how they do it" is irrelevant. Just because we, the average people, don't know the step by step process, doesn't mean they don't know how to do it.


But when the people who say it can be done are not experts in meteorology or specifically tropical cyclones, whereas those who say it can't be done are, one has to wonder ....


I understand what you're saying and I agree with you. But that doesn't mean it's not possible.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-7-2007 @ 08:06 AM by darkheartrising



Originally posted by CrimsonSaberACTUAL
Has anybody checked these out?




more than a WEEK PRIOR to Katrina having made landfall.

The EnterpriseMission: Captain's Blog

This is from Ophelia. This storm was anticipated to RAGE and then impact the east coast near DC or NYC. Instead... it just petered out, and then drifted off into the ocean...

Or did it?



[edit on 6/15/2007 by kinglizard]


Mr. Kinglizard
if I get this straight, you are saying that the red spots behind the hurricane are heating up the ocean and "pulling" the hurricane towards them and away from land?
and the technology probably used is??? HAARP?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-7-2007 @ 05:05 AM by Essan


And I'm saying that they are well known glitches in the image processing software



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2007 @ 06:52 PM by Kr0n0s


Interesting thread, thanks for the link darkheart, I will try and read more of the details later on tonight and possibly offer up an opinion of my own..



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-8-2007 @ 04:44 AM by Kr0n0s


Weather manipulation has been around for quite a few years, basic manipulation like cloud seeding but there's no doubting its truth. What I cant be sure about though is exactly who possesses this type of technology and for what or whos agenda is something like this used to support.
I dont believe that common terrorists possess this kind of technology, so that would count them out.
A theory that I'd been tossing around since about the time that Kat hit, is that at least some of these storms, since at least 05, were created or at least influenced by the the US or factions working outside of or in conjunction with, the US Govt.
Too tired to go into any more details.
good thread btw

[edit on 8/19/2007 by Kr0n0s]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:






ATS MIX Podcasts:


Recently Added Videos







Newest Topics:























ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)


















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.008 seconds
Page processed in 0.138 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

thread