I'm going to take a slightly different spin on this.
Up till now, it looks like people fall into the camp of either it's okay to say it, or it's not.
I don't care if the word was "Widget", no one, not even the FCC, has the right to ban words overall. Even the FCC doesn't have specifically banned
words anymore. Their criteria is judged as such:
The FCC's responsibility is to enforce federal obscenity laws. Even these laws don't define obscenity with a list of words or uses. Instead,
material must meet three requirements to be considered obscene:
Applying community standards, an average person must find that the material appeals to the prurient interest.
The material shows or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by law.
The material, as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
And for those of you whom English is not a first language, or it is a first language and Bergan Evans was not your friend:
pru·ri·ent /ˈprʊriənt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proor-ee-uhnt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. having, inclined to have, or characterized by lascivious or lustful thoughts, desires, etc.
2. causing lasciviousness or lust.
3. having a restless desire or longing.
So I suppose that New York City, if they are to claim the FCCs criteria for obscenity, states that the word "'n-word'" brings about "lasciviousness
and lust", defines a specific sexual conduct, and has no literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Of all those things required to constitute an "indecent" word, the only thing I could see is a lack of scientific value, since, if anything, there
are far more impressive latin-sounding words available.
Now, while I'm sure there's slang terms for sexual positions that use the word, they aren't in common enough usage to bring that imagery about, and
one would have to be an illiterate, blind, and uncultured fool to have never read a book, seen a work of art, or heart a political speech that didn't
use the word at some point to drive home a point.
Hell, are they going to start burning copies of Tom Sawyer?
Are they going to ban the works of Malcolm X?
Are they going to ban every play, every painting, every historical document or speech that references the word?
Just what the hell are they trying to prove? Are they telling us that the mere mention of a controversial racially related word is as publicly
offensive as an overt description of a sexual act? Right now, if I were black man, I'd be a very angry black man.