This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth


<<  1    2    3  >>

Topic started on 1-3-2007 @ 10:58 AM by kleverone


Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth


Source Link: www.livescience.com

Scientists scanning the deep interior of Earth have found evidence of a vast water reservoir beneath eastern Asia that is at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean.

The discovery marks the first time such a large body of water has found in the planet’s deep mantle.

The finding, made by Michael Wysession, a seismologist at Washington State University in St. Louis, and his former graduate student Jesse Lawrence, now at the University of California, San Diego, will be detailed in a forthcoming monograph to be published by the American Geophysical Union.
(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Please follow submission guidelines. Thanks

[edit on 3/1/07 by FredT]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:01 AM by befoiled


Couldn't get the link to work. Gonna google it...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:05 AM by kleverone


Or just go to www.livescience.com

Its the top story!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:05 AM by befoiled


Got it. Was a little too impatient I guess. Wonder what the hollow earthers make of this?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:07 AM by kleverone


Not sure. It certainly doesn't hurt their argument! Can't wait to hear more about this!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:09 AM by MischeviousElf


Link seems to work however maybe the headline is misleading, the water is the same volume as the artic sea, however it is saturated within the porous rocks there, it is not an seperate body or ocean of unending water molecules,

very interesting find thanks

regards

elf



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:12 AM by lombozo


I understand that when oil is taken from the earth, that they pump in sea water to fill the void. Could this be all it is?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:13 AM by kleverone


it is slightly misleading I'm blaming livescience.com



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:14 AM by kleverone



Originally posted by lombozo
I understand that when oil is taken from the earth, that they pump in sea water to fill the void. Could this be all it is?


Not sure, its under china. Not a whole lot of oil drilling there I don't believe.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:23 AM by MischeviousElf


Much more detailed sory on ATS here with additional information:

ATS Mysterious Forum Thread

Goes into much more detail.


Regards

Elf



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:33 AM by kleverone


Nice link, thanks elf! Very interesting stuff!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:39 AM by Nygdan



www.livescience.com...
It would still look like solid rock to you,” Wysession told LiveScience. “You would have to put it in the lab to find the water in it


They are talking about subducting slabs of oceanic crust having the water driven off of it, and it percolating through the mantle and into the continental crust.

Explicity, this is NOT an ocean residing in a cavern underground, or some such.


Its also unrelate to the practice of pumping water into oil resevoirs (which are ALSO not oil filled caverns, but rather oil in the tiny pore spaces of rocks), which I beleive is done to maintain pressure for oil recovery.


STill fascinating. ANd notice how they found it, seismic data, with the seismic waves being slowed when they pass through rock bearing 'water'. And sometimes this water is not even H2O, but rather Hydroxide ions within the mineral structure, like they note here:

www.livescience.com...
Although they appear solid, the composition of some ocean floor rocks is up to 15 percent water. “The water molecules are actually stuck in the mineral structure of the rock,” Wysession explained. “As you heat this up, it eventually dehydrates. It’s like taking clay and firing it to get all the water out.”


[edit on 1-3-2007 by Nygdan]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 11:50 AM by kleverone



Originally posted by Nygdan
ANd notice how they found it, seismic data, with the seismic waves being slowed when they pass through rock bearing 'water'. And sometimes this water is not even H2O, but rather Hydroxide ions within the mineral structure, like they note here:

www.livescience.com...
Although they appear solid, the composition of some ocean floor rocks is up to 15 percent water. “The water molecules are actually stuck in the mineral structure of the rock,” Wysession explained. “As you heat this up, it eventually dehydrates. It’s like taking clay and firing it to get all the water out.”


[edit on 1-3-2007 by Nygdan]


I noticed that as well! Its not like they found an ocean with some guy in a boat fishing it! They were reading the seismic activity was slowing down. Some good ole' fashion thinking! You gotta love that!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 12:08 PM by JbT


The title is very misleading to this post.

First off, they do not call these "oceans" of water below the earth. They are stating that there is areas of sturated rock, which if you do not look at in a lab, you couldnt tell it was even saturated.

So, lets not fool ourselfs into thinking that there are caverns of open space with "oceans" of water flowing. Its is simply (or not so simply) areas of the earth that spong up water due to many reasons maybe not yet known.

The only reference to an ocean is that the size of the area in question is roughly the size of the atlantic oceans (if i remeber correct).

[edit on 1-3-2007 by JbT]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 12:09 PM by Nygdan


FWIW, the title is that of the article that the OP is linking to.

The OP didn't create the title.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 12:14 PM by JbT



Originally posted by Nygdan
FWIW, the title is that of the article that the OP is linking to.

The OP didn't create the title.


Then the credibility of that article needs to be looked at, cause its false.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 01:12 PM by kleverone



Originally posted by JbT

Originally posted by Nygdan
FWIW, the title is that of the article that the OP is linking to.

The OP didn't create the title.


Then the credibility of that article needs to be looked at, cause its false.


It is not false, its semantics! Notice that the word ocean is paraphrased!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 01:31 PM by JbT


Yes, semantics for sure.... But at a site where people will use this for fuel to support their theorys of "Hollow earth" and such, I feel this needs to be made light of.

Anyways, back to the story and info now that we know the facts, still interesting as is.

[edit on 1-3-2007 by JbT]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 01:31 PM by Royal76


The "Crap People".. "Crap People".. "Crap People".. "Crap People".. "Crap People".. live man. Don't go down there or you will end up being turned into one. They want to rise to the surface and take over the world.

Dont you watch South Park Man. Its where you go for the latest news, and events.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-3-2007 @ 01:44 PM by kleverone



Originally posted by JbT
Yes, semantics for sure.... But at a site where people will use this for fuel to support their theorys of "Hollow earth" and such, I feel this needs to be made light of.

Anyways, back to the story and info now that we know the facts, still interesting as is.

[edit on 1-3-2007 by JbT]


I believe that here at ATS we presume that most people will actualy read the article before posting. We as individuals think for ourselvses and therefore "make light" the issue ourselves. I understand what you are saying though.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 2.556 seconds
Page processed in 0.665 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread