AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Other Current Events discussion forum.  (rss)


It's not looking good for N. Korea




Topic started on 21-12-2003 @ 04:59 PM by Strigoi


story.news.yahoo.com.../latimes_ts/20031221/ts_latimes/usputsitslatestarmsinskorea



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Other Current Events topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 05:04 PM by ThePrankMonkey


Originally posted by Strigoi
story.news.yahoo.com.../latimes_ts/20031221/ts_latimes/usputsitslatestarmsinskorea



looks like crazy kim is next on the chopping block...this should be entertaining.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 08:29 AM by KrazyJethro


Here we go again. I'm not sure what North Korea will do about this, but I am interested to find out what China will do. They are the real problem.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-12-2003 @ 12:34 PM by omkao


Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Here we go again. I'm not sure what North Korea will do about this, but I am interested to find out what China will do. They are the real problem.


China is doing what she should do now.Lesson its "little brother' and Preparing a second-round Six-party meeting,as soon as next month in beijing.The real challenge is how News Agencies balance its reports(Anti;Pro-,Positive;Negative),and how we,readers can obtain a more balanced view.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 24-12-2003 @ 01:03 PM by THENEO


Since China is always on the look for new acquisitions for itself it really has no need to support Lil Kim. To do so would jeapordize their chances at adopting Taiwan etc.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-12-2003 @ 01:39 PM by ProjectX


I say we just assasinate Crazy kimm and end this whole thing with no casualties...well.....except Kim himself



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-12-2003 @ 03:11 AM by Hemps


oh geez, there is one thing my dad always tells me, "dont # with north korea"

i dont know if it would be such a good idea to interfere.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-12-2003 @ 03:35 AM by mamaship


If Iraq was messy, what will N. Korea be? How many "decapitation" strikes against saddam. And I think Kim is 100x for psycotic than Hussein. He's a must go, but I can't imagine there being an easy way about it. Massive cassualties and we'll just piss off the last few allies we have.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-12-2003 @ 03:16 PM by DClark


I don't think we try anything with N.Korea within the next year. I think the majority of troops in Iraq will have to be back in U.S. before we take out pimp kim.

I think right now though, we are developing our best war plan for N.Korea. (gathering intel and such, implanting intel people inside the country)

Hopefully we can just assassinate the little bastard and save more lives. Although something tells me that wouldn't take care of the problem, someone would just step in and think they are invincible. Either way, the next year should be very interesting.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-12-2003 @ 04:09 PM by omkao


Originally posted by DClark
I don't think we try anything with N.Korea within the next year. I think the majority of troops in Iraq will have to be back in U.S. before we take out pimp kim.

I think right now though, we are developing our best war plan for N.Korea. (gathering intel and such, implanting intel people inside the country)

Hopefully we can just assassinate the little bastard and save more lives. Although something tells me that wouldn't take care of the problem, someone would just step in and think they are invincible. Either way, the next year should be very interesting.


Crazy Kim is not an idiot anyway,he knows well how to deal with U.S.,especially U.S. is busying doing something else. U.S. president(lawmakers) is not an idiot too,he knows well how to handle DPRK,especially DPRK is too poor to afford a war,nothing guarantee the pay back,not like IRAQ.

[Edited on 25-12-2003 by omkao]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.





















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.058 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]