 |
|
Topic started on 21-12-2003 @ 02:50 PM by JeanLucPicard
|
What is wrong with Bush? What has done to people for them to hate him so much? I ask you, what has he done?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 02:52 PM by DiRtYDeViL
|
Your a plant. Flat out for sure. You have read why we don't trust Bush yet you still bring it up. Tell Rove to # off we aren't falling for your
psyop crap.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 02:54 PM by JeanLucPicard
|
I haven't read why you don't trust him. Only what you think of him. What I am asking is why you think this way of him.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 04:56 PM by NotTooHappy
|
Here's a few.
1. Rigged the election
2. Started a "pre-emptive" war for no reason.
3. Caused thousands of deaths because of his "pre-emptive" war.
4. Lied about WMD's being in Iraq so he could go to war and steal it's rescources.
I'm sure people will post more reasons.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 04:59 PM by JeanLucPicard
|
I used to think Bush wasn't too bad of a person. Now, I don't really like him!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 05:07 PM by Cyrus
|
he is dumb, a rube.
he also puts his interests above death...which sickens me
oil above all, which =
he's also about to rig up the elections again...but most of all? i hate the fact that he is well and truly...unstoppable
[Edited on 21-12-2003 by Cyrus]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 05:10 PM by JeanLucPicard
|
I can't belive he is willing to wage a war over what he thinks  .
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 05:28 PM by dexxy
|
I can't believe your willing to post...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 05:35 PM by Cyrus
|
Originally posted by JeanLucPicard
I can't belive he is willing to wage a war over what he thinks  . 
psyop again? why play ignorant with these matters.
he is, the ultimate villain...he wont go down so easy.
why? because he started the war, any1 who supports war for clear self-benefitiary reasons is a criminal in essence or stench.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-12-2003 @ 06:06 PM by Paradigm
|
Well, Bush and his administration have some pretty crappy things.
1) Not ratifying the Kyoto treaty
2) Patriot act, Guantanamo etc. (what happened to the land of the free?)
3) Unilateralist military action based on bad intelligence
4) Pissing off some of America's European allies and trying to divide them in the process (Woohoo, Old Europe vs. New Europe )
5) Running up the US deficit
I'm not saying that they haven't done anything good, it's just that bad things tend to stick to your mind more easily.
[Edited on 21-12-2003 by Paradigm]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 08:49 AM by joehayner
|
Wow, a whole thread dedicated to preaching to the choir! I agree that Bushie hasn't been the best prez, but I'd say he'd done an OK job in the
aftermath of 9/11. I wouldn't call you a traitor for disagreeing with him, it's your constitutional right to have a different opinion.
I do not believe he rigged the election. If you paid any attention at all, you'd see he won by a supreme court ruling.(bit hard to rig that) Gore did
win the popular vote, but that's the way our system can work. This isn't the first time that happened.
The patriot act is a bit scary, I think there should be some check on it, to keep it in place. If the wrong people used it, you can wave bye-bye to
our bill of rights.(same goes for the sedition act)
Our invasion of Iraq was all but unilateral in definition. We didn't get the whole UN to come with us, but then again, the UN is a total joke. France
and Russia were probably selling arms to the Iraqis anyway. We had a few nations in our coalition. So I guess you could say that the US, Britain,
Canada, and a few others went in unilaterally.
The only thing that worries me is the deficit. Bushie is a big spender. He needs to cut back on his spending, he's not being fiscally
conservative.
Other than that, you're just spouting conspiracy theories. And they're just that...THEORIES.
G'day!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:15 AM by Bob88
|
He was hated from day one, simply for being a Republican.
If Clinton did what Bush did in Iraq he'd be a hero, the greatest, etc.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 09:21 AM by DiRtYDeViL
|
Originally posted by Bob88
He was hated from day one, simply for being a Republican.
If Clinton did what Bush did in Iraq he'd be a hero, the greatest, etc.

BS. that's why when pnac passed the idea to Clinton he turned them down. Double standards are more popular with conservatives while they preach clean
living and molest children. Oh yea mean u didn't know about that? www.voxfux.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 10:28 AM by joehayner
|
What the hell is that? Sounds like tabloid material. Things like that should never be printed in such 'widly known' newspapers. Though, it is a lib
paper.
Why isn't there more 'media spotlight' if this is true. Where the hell is Ken Starr now!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 02:13 PM by pornanist
|
he also is the worst environmental president this world has ever seen
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 02:16 PM by drunk
|
Whats wrong with Bush?
Well for starters he's President of the U.S.A he shouldnt be.
He's a warmongering greedy terrorist
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 02:19 PM by DiRtYDeViL
|
Originally posted by joehayner
What the hell is that? Sounds like tabloid material. Things like that should never be printed in such 'widly known' newspapers. Though, it is a lib
paper.
Why isn't there more 'media spotlight' if this is true. Where the hell is Ken Starr now! 
The Washington Times is a tabloid didn't know that sorry.
It was a big story for about one day before it was killed.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 02:42 PM by ashley
|
I think every one agrees bush is an idiot.As far as trusting him goes,I cant say i dont trust bush, because i dont think even he knows what he is
doing.
It is clear that he just does what he is told and tries hard to not screw that up.Wolfie,rummy and the rest of the pnac are running things and bush is
just the patsy,a useful idiot.He has his face on everything but he isnt smart enough to know what hes talking about,This is evident when you listen to
his old speeches when he was pretending to be a world leader.He just plain doesnt know what he is talking about.Nowadays he is all slogans and
cliches,at least that is something he knows.
I dont trust bush not because of who he is.I dont trust bush because of who he isnt,a man that knows he is being pointed in the wrong direction and to
stupid to know it.If you follow bush you are stupider than he and i think he gets some kind of a kick out of it.Now with this war going so badly its
becoming more and more apparent that
the rummy is a dummy and the rummy is a dummy
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 07:17 PM by Djarums
|
You know having been a registered user for over a year and a reader for longer than that, I take personal offense to NEW members attacking another NEW
member for asking a question. Who in the hell do you think you are having been here for a week to flame someone for trying to look further in to
something. Welcome to this site. We do that here. We look into things. He wanted to know why people on here dislike Bush. So #ing what. Get over
yourselves and stop giving the guy a hard time for having the audacity to ask something. If you don't like his question don't reply but keep your
flames to yourself. You haven't been here long enough to have earned the right to question what other people can and can't ask.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2003 @ 07:19 PM by DiRtYDeViL
|
Originally posted by Djarums
You know having been a registered user for over a year and a reader for longer than that, I take personal offense to NEW members attacking another NEW
member for asking a question. Who in the hell do you think you are having been here for a week to flame someone for trying to look further in to
something. Welcome to this site. We do that here. We look into things. He wanted to know why people on here dislike Bush. So #ing what. Get over
yourselves and stop giving the guy a hard time for having the audacity to ask something. If you don't like his question don't reply but keep your
flames to yourself. You haven't been here long enough to have earned the right to question what other people can and can't ask. 
yeasir masta so sorry u so right.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |