In one sentence, Why should I vote for you?

Originally posted by chissler
In one sentence, Why should I vote for you?

That's easy: vote for me so that I can uphold the constitution, make sure that Europe if ever invaded by terrorists gets help from a foreign presence like ours if they can't handle it, we should make sure that the terrorists get defeated; we should raise interest rates so that the economy doesn't collapse and we don't have to rely on Chinas market so that our market doesn't fall, we need to work on intel; what we need to do is to make sure that Al-quaeda doesn't get a nuke so that they can't bring it over here, and also, we need to ensure that the government works and is efficient and will do everything right and not break the laws of the constitution but to abide by them.

I am going to analyze the constitution in my next few posts. I believe we should impeach the current administration because they are inadvertent to our constitution.

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Well apparently some misconduct and the powers of the government has been translated to fit modern times. The definition of the constitution is strict, and the administration is breaking it by

They talk about project granite and the use of military force on the United States. The mismanagement has clearly continued to a point where it is useless to accost the government itself. So that being said, they plan to patrol the United States with its own "special" police, they plan to use the military as a police force. This is a violation of our 10th amendment that states that the powers not given to the government or to the state is reserved to the people. They are using a power they don't have, which is a violation of our rights. If another terrorist attack happens and we are propelled into a state of emergency, they say that our constitution will be suspended and our rights will be abridged and that they will arrest us without a warrent normally. IF this happens that is a violation of our 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and of the 10th ammendment. They are also violating our 14th ammendment because that gives a clearer definition for the prevention of discrimination against people due to race and they're doing this for middle-eastern people.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

The constitution must be upheld and the articles that are voted in MUST BE VALID TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES as said of the original constitution. That means they violated the 1st amendment

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

:p
NO problems here :p, but they should retain the original intents and purposes as said of the constiution. They think the constitution is too STRICT and thus they are breaking many of the rules!

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

The ammendments must pertain to what was originally written in the text. They cannot be changed, unlike a story, they must be followed.


[edit on 16-3-2007 by Maverickhunter]

Originally posted by Maverickhunter

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Well apparently some misconduct and the powers of the government has been translated to fit modern times. The definition of the constitution is strict, and the administration is breaking it by

They talk about project granite and the use of military force on the United States. The mismanagement has clearly continued to a point where it is useless to accost the government itself. So that being said, they plan to patrol the United States with its own "special" police, they plan to use the military as a police force. This is a violation of our 10th amendment that states that the powers not given to the government or to the state is reserved to the people. They are using a power they don't have, which is a violation of our rights. If another terrorist attack happens and we are propelled into a state of emergency, they say that our constitution will be suspended and our rights will be abridged and that they will arrest us without a warrent normally. IF this happens that is a violation of our 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and of the 10th ammendment. They are also violating our 14th ammendment because that gives a clearer definition for the prevention of discrimination against people due to race and they're doing this for middle-eastern people.

Who are "they?" George Bush? Please state where exactly he said he plans to do this?

Grounds for impeaching bush.

Hello, so I wanted to ask you what your position on the church and state is. The United States politics within the last seven years has been breaching the constitution and I would say they are anti-constitutionalist down there and that the Republicans have been intentionally inaverdent to the constitution and that George W.Bush should not be allowed to hold office because he has a "constitutional disability.

I want to tell you how many times George W. Bush has broke our constitution. How many times he has closed the gap between church and state and has said that the separation fo church and state was only a myth. WE need to realize that Church and State are separated because we are far from midieval times and we have gone to a modern timespan and what they are doing would make our nation a christian nation when we have many people from many other religions in our nation. Even though Christianity is the main religion in the US of A, we need to be more tolerant, and have to ask you what your stance is on this because Bush may just go awol of the constitution and ratify the gay marrage ammendment and abolish the roe vs wade case results. He may even take away our miranda rights while we're at it.

"Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
He is making sure that we cannot speak out against the Iraq war and that sevaral people that speak out against the Iraq war should be tried for treason. Under the patriot act he gives them the right to try anyone for treason and that they can be detained to a remote location if they speak out against the government.

"Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
He made it clear that he wants the assault weapons ban in D.C a law to protect the country from a rebellion even though that may be in the best interest of the country.

"Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
He must be using a different constitution than we are (the bible) because he is apparently making it so that they don't need a warrant or probable cause to violate this law so that they can search our home. He apparently doesn't think that the words warrent or seizures are in this ammendment.

"Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
The President never declared that we are in a state of war. WE are operational right now, so also the President failed to realize this so the fifth ammendment still applies to us.

"Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
People can be detained without a warrant. Sent to a detainment camp, and sent to a prison without even bothering to have held a trial. The sixth ammendment rules out the fifth ammendment and says that they can have a trial.

"Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
He most likely wants them to have unlimited bail so that they can never get out because they are "*********" and that they can be a threat to our country when most of them have done nothing wrong.

"Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Ammendments 7 and 8 conflict with the patriot act.

"Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
The right to gay marrage should not be in the hands of George W Bush but the rights to gay marrage and abortion should be allowed for the people under this law, as should the right to protest should be allowed.

"Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Well, all rights should include every right, and this includes the right to vote, which thousands of members lost, after the 2000 electio

Originally posted by Maverickhunter

Grounds for impeaching bush.

Hello, so I wanted to ask you what your position on the church and state is. The United States politics within the last seven years has been breaching the constitution and I would say they are anti-constitutionalist down there and that the Republicans have been intentionally inaverdent to the constitution and that George W.Bush should not be allowed to hold office because he has a "constitutional disability.

I want to tell you how many times George W. Bush has broke our constitution. How many times he has closed the gap between church and state and has said that the separation fo church and state was only a myth. WE need to realize that Church and State are separated because we are far from midieval times and we have gone to a modern timespan and what they are doing would make our nation a christian nation when we have many people from many other religions in our nation. Even though Christianity is the main religion in the US of A, we need to be more tolerant, and have to ask you what your stance is on this because Bush may just go awol of the constitution and ratify the gay marrage ammendment and abolish the roe vs wade case results. He may even take away our miranda rights while we're at it.

Less bull, more examples. Go.

Johnmike, are you for the furthering violations of the Bush administrations violations of our own rights? Are you saying that I am wrong in saying that they have violated the constitution? If so, please provide examples of how they ABIDED by the constitution, because the patriot act seems to act as an appeal to the bill of rights.

Originally posted by Maverickhunter
I am going to analyze the constitution in my next few posts. I believe we should impeach the current administration because they are inadvertent to our constitution.

Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Grounds for impeaching bush.

Originally posted by Maverickhunter
the Republicans have been intentionally inaverdent to the constitution and that George W.Bush should not be allowed to hold office because he has a "constitutional disability.

Originally posted by Maverickhunter
I want to tell you how many times George W. Bush has broke our constitution.

Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Actually now that I think about it, we should impeach Chaney instead.

Erm...

Hmm... It depends, especially since the Supreme Court said that the Act was Constitutional. Can you find specific examples of why the Patriot Act is unconstitutional?