It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r4758
This reporter needs to be questioned as to whether or not one of the buildings behind her (wtc 7) collapsed just after she did this report.
She needs to be questioned soon.
[edit on 27-2-2007 by r4758]
Components to be Retained
The following components to be retained:-
Two broadcast standard copies of all transmitted/published TV, Radio and BBCi output – one to be stored on a separate site as a master
One browse-quality version for research purposes, to protect the broadcast material
All supporting metadata to enable research and re-use
A selection of original (i.e. unedited) material for re-use/re-versioning purposes
Hardware/software/equipment to enable replay/transfer of the media
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Please show me one other example of a steal frame building that collapsed from fire that is similar to a controlled demolition in a fashion similar to WTC 7.
As for those that are saying "Identified" is a dis info agent....just look at the evolution of her post.
From the supposed housewife who's supposed husband takes a limo to the WTC complex and did not know which building he had his meetings in to the informed expert on demolitions and the 9-11 and NIST reports.
[edit on 28-2-2007 by etshrtslr]
you may have heard a few moments ago we were talking about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing and indeed it has, and apparently it's only a few hundred yards away from where the World Trade Center Towers were.
Portions of the report are transcribed below. The numbers in bold indicate times, in minutes and seconds, from the beginning of the mpeg recording.
03:15 ~4:47 PM: The anchor states:
We'll leave it there for a moment. We've got some news just coming in actually, that the Solomon Brothers' Building in New York, right in the heart of Manhattan, has also collapsed. This does fit in with a warning from the British Foreign Office a couple of hours ago to British Citizens that there is a real risk -- ah let me get the exact words -- the British Foreign Office -- the foreign part of the British government -- said it was a strong risk of further atrocities in the United States, and it does seem as if there now is another one with the Solomon Brothers' Building collapsing. We've got no word yet on casualities. One assumes that the building would have been virtually deserted. Whether this latest collapse is going to influence the President, who we heard about a few moments ago, who was expected to be heading from Nebraska back to Washington, we don't know.
06:31 ~5:00 PM: The anchor states:
The 47-story Solomon Brothers', situated very close to the World Trade Center, has also just collapsed.
13:20 ~5:07 PM: The anchor states:
Now more on the latest building collapse in New York ... you may have heard a few moments ago we were talking about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing and indeed it has, and apparently it's only a few hundred yards away from where the World Trade Center Towers were. And it seems that this was not the result of a new attack; it was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks. We'll probably find out more about that from our correspondent Jane Standley. Jane, what more can you tell us about the Solomon Brothers' Building and its collapse?
14:00 ~5:08 PM: The screen is filled by correspondent Jane Standley standing in front of a window framing smoke rising from Ground Zero and a clearly erect WTC 7.
15:35 ~5:09 PM: The caption on the bottom of the screen reads:
The 47 storey Salomon Brothers building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed.
20:15 ~5:14 PM: The image of Jane Standley begins to break up and the anchor, remarking that they'd "lost the line" with Jane Standley, shifts to another report.
This YouTube video captures a portion of the mpeg starting at 00:13:20.
Veracity of Conclusion
Questions prompted by the report include: How do we know what the correct time of the broadcast footage is? and How do we know that the imagery behind Jane Standley is live?
It is unlikely that the real times estimated above are off by more than a minute. The mpeg files are located in directories on archive.org with names that encode times down to the minute. For example, the directory name bbc200109111654-1736 encodes the time range 4:54 - 5:36 PM. No part of the 41-minute recording that contains the report shows a digital clock, but other recordings do, and suggest that the encoding of times into directory names is as meticulously accurate as the set of recordings is complete. For example, an NBC broadcast recording with the directory name nbc200109110954-1036, encoding the time range 9:54 - 10:35 AM, shows a clock with minutes and seconds. It displays a time of 10:20 starting at 25:34 in the recording, putting the start of the recording at 9:54:26 AM.
That Jane Standley was standing in front of a live view showing WTC 7 as she describes it in the past tense is virtually indisputable. The high-quality mpeg video clearly shows that she is in front of a row of windows in a tall building.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I've been away for like 15 pages, so if this has been brought up, I apologize.
BBC Media Management Policy
If they kept 2 copies... What kind of a "cock-up" happened exactly? How could they lose the broadcast and then lose the copy of the most important news event in the last 100 years?
Why are they covering this up? Seems to me they'd want to find out what happened, too. Instead, they sweep it under the rug...
Originally posted by T0by
Has this thread been locked?
Theres no way theres been no posts in 6-7 hrs!!!
Edit: wow ok!
[edit on 1-3-2007 by T0by]
Originally posted by Fjtruth
Hope this isn't deemed too off topic, but I was wondering how the fire(s) started in WTC7.
The buildings structure and my being your physics instructor is not the reason for this thread.