It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r4758
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The only thing that troubles me is.. why?
I mean, if you were the government, you wouldnt NEED to tell anyone PRIOR...
its meaningless.. the towers are coming down, and the surprise and shock is what your aiming for... why spoil it and take the risk of someone being to eager?
There was no need to inform anyone, ESPECIALLY the media.
I think it will be a logical explanation for this.
Consider how the media started sayin Bin Laden, Bin Laden, Bin Laden, almost immediately after the attacks.
Perhaps those behind the scene want to get their version of events out to the media quickly before any other interpretation is allowed.
Then, repeat this version ad infinium, and allow no other interpretations.
Don't allow anyone to think. Tell people what they are seeing, why it happened and then tell people how they are reacting.
Repeat, repeat, repeat.
Building 7 collapsed. It was weakened by falling debris. Big burly men are in tears.
This is just a guess.
Originally posted by mecheng
Just give me the truth. I'm a logical guy. If we're going to come up with a CT we shoud at least be able to answer the who, what, where, when an why's... no?
Originally posted by shindigger
Absolutely, it worked for the first election too.
Originally posted by mecheng
Originally posted by kuhl
Mechong theres the door leave
Just give me the truth. I'm a logical guy. If we're going to come up with a CT we shoud at least be able to answer the who, what, where, when an why's... no?
Originally posted by r4758
Consider how the media started sayin Bin Laden, Bin Laden, Bin Laden, almost immediately after the attacks.
Perhaps those behind the scene want to get their version of events out to the media quickly before any other interpretation is allowed.
Then, repeat this version ad infinium, and allow no other interpretations.
Don't allow anyone to think. Tell people what they are seeing, why it happened and then tell people how they are reacting.
Repeat, repeat, repeat.
Building 7 collapsed. It was weakened by falling debris. Big burly men are in tears.
This is just a guess.
Originally posted by timeless test
Originally posted by mister Jones
OK, this is the last time i'm asking this.
if it was just a mistake (it was a chaotic day), a miscommunication then why did google and the BBC go through so much trouble to cover it up? Why heavily censor this piece of "innocent" footage?
If that is actually what has happened then I can't give you a good answer to that question. However, I don't see youtube blocking it now, it's all over the place and as I understand it the original video was not on a BBC source but an independent archive which is now available again in full.
I'm not a technical whizz but is it possible that a relatively low key (?) archive site simply got overwhelmed by traffic and pulled the video to protect its bandwidth?
Originally posted by Identified
Am I mistaken here or is Archive.org not related to BBC in anyway other than they archive websites?
Ask them why they pulled something they had previously archived. They had to have gotten the footage from somewhere. The BBC would have covered-up this sort of "evidence" by not allowing it out on the web to begin with where Archive.org could archive it.
I still see no evidence of a cover-up.
Originally posted by Identified
"We decided to pull it."
All that man meant was that they had sustained a loss of many firemen during the collapse of the twin towers, were having a hard time containing the fire in WTC7 and felt it was just best to stop fighting it and get the men out. Assuming that the phrase "Pull it" means to bring it down by means of explosives or whatnot is just a sweeping assumption. The men having that discussion that day are not demolition men and to assume they would be using demolition terms is again a sweeping assumption.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
I LIVED AND WORKED in lower Manhattan and never new which building was which in that complex. Do you expect a reporter from the BBC to have the layout of WTC plaza memorized?
Originally posted by Muppetus Galacticus
I agree. If "they" didn't care about the people in the first two towers before they went down, why would they bother clearing everyone away from this tower?
Originally posted by r4758
Originally posted by Identified
"We decided to pull it."
All that man meant was that they had sustained a loss of many firemen during the collapse of the twin towers, were having a hard time containing the fire in WTC7 and felt it was just best to stop fighting it and get the men out. Assuming that the phrase "Pull it" means to bring it down by means of explosives or whatnot is just a sweeping assumption. The men having that discussion that day are not demolition men and to assume they would be using demolition terms is again a sweeping assumption.
Except that there were no firefighters in building 7 when Larry Silverstein made the famous "pull it" statement. They had left WTC 7 several hours earlier.
Originally posted by r4758
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The only thing that troubles me is.. why?
I mean, if you were the government, you wouldnt NEED to tell anyone PRIOR...
its meaningless.. the towers are coming down, and the surprise and shock is what your aiming for... why spoil it and take the risk of someone being to eager?
There was no need to inform anyone, ESPECIALLY the media.
I think it will be a logical explanation for this.
Consider how the media started sayin Bin Laden, Bin Laden, Bin Laden, almost immediately after the attacks.
Perhaps those behind the scene want to get their version of events out to the media quickly before any other interpretation is allowed.
Then, repeat this version ad infinium, and allow no other interpretations.
Don't allow anyone to think. Tell people what they are seeing, why it happened and then tell people how they are reacting.
Repeat, repeat, repeat.
Building 7 collapsed. It was weakened by falling debris. Big burly men are in tears.
This is just a guess.
Originally posted by timeless test
I'm not a technical whizz but is it possible that a relatively low key (?) archive site simply got overwhelmed by traffic and pulled the video to protect its bandwidth?
Internet Archive
Nonprofit organisation established to preserve Web sites by taking regular "snapshots". The Wayback Machine provides links to older versions of a webpage.
www.archive.org/ - 35k - Feb 26, 2007 - Cached - Similar pages
Wayback Machine - www.archive.org/web/web.php
Search - www.archive.org/search.php
Live Music Archive - www.archive.org/details/etree
Audio - www.archive.org/details/audio
More results from www.archive.org »
Internet Archive: Wayback Machine
JasonStone, 0, 614, January 16, 2007 05:47:44pm. does archive.org support chinese site? maketop, 0, 2404, October 11, 2006 07:18:30pm. View more forum posts ...
www.archive.org/web/web.php - 54k - Feb 26, 2007 - Cached - Similar pages
september11.archive.org
Collection of web content from around the globe, including international news, national news, government/military and charitable organizations.
september11.archive.org/ - 1k - Cached - Similar pages
Internet Archive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was brought to my attention that all of the Grateful Dead shows were taken down from Archive.org right before Thanksgiving. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Archive - 50k - Cached - Similar pages
Originally posted by r4758
Except that there were no firefighters in building 7 when Larry Silverstein made the famous "pull it" statement. They had left WTC 7 several hours earlier.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic...In the confusion of clearing the building using radio communications, somebody heard that it was "coming down". An affirmative Press Release was issued. "Building 7 IS collapsing or has collapsed". And that went out over the wire.
BBC read it as fact before the detonation could take place.