It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BBC News Reports Building 7 collapse 23 Minutes before it collapses.

page: 28
101
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The only thing that troubles me is.. why?

I mean, if you were the government, you wouldnt NEED to tell anyone PRIOR...

its meaningless.. the towers are coming down, and the surprise and shock is what your aiming for... why spoil it and take the risk of someone being to eager?

There was no need to inform anyone, ESPECIALLY the media.

I think it will be a logical explanation for this.


I think I'm beginning to agree with you here. If someone had knowledge ahead of time that they were going to pull it why not just keep quiet until it came down? Things aren't really adding up in my mind.




posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Crakeur
anyone know where the woman was filmed from because, looking at a map of the wtc makes it kind of hard to figure out which angle this was taken from.


Post from Page 19



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by mecheng


I think I'm beginning to agree with you here. If someone had knowledge ahead of time that they were going to pull it why not just keep quiet until it came down? Things aren't really adding up in my mind.


I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it, so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by deltaboy
I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it

Very possible. People here have already shown numerous false reporting on 9/11 a lot of which I'm sure was due to people simply trying to break the news.

so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.

I think some BBC person heard through the grapevine that the firemen were clearing the area expecting it to come down and made a deduction from there.
Perhaps when the feed quit, it was because soemone realized they jumped the gun.

[edit on 27-2-2007 by mecheng]



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by deltaboy

Originally posted by mecheng


I think I'm beginning to agree with you here. If someone had knowledge ahead of time that they were going to pull it why not just keep quiet until it came down? Things aren't really adding up in my mind.


I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it, so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.





posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:30 PM
link   
I think this entire video is a classic example of how chaotic the information coming in was and how networks clamour to be the first to report something and many times get the facts wrong.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by shindigger

Could you put that in words please?



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by tombangelta

Originally posted by thematrix
Recent testimony by Zbigniew Brazinski infront of congress that stated that if any other 9/11 type events happened you could be sure the goverment was behind it, has led me to believe that we might be seeing now that the orchestrators or NWO guys are calling it quits for now (to try another decade?) and are actualy setting Cheney and Bush up for the fall.



i would give my right ball to see bush and cheney up for war crimes

even if it didnt stop the NWO, god that would be sweet


ME TOO... I would love to see a public hangin... no not really, but you know what I mean.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:31 PM
link   
does the forum have a teamspeak. cos i have one that we could all use



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by shindigger

Originally posted by deltaboy

Originally posted by mecheng


I think I'm beginning to agree with you here. If someone had knowledge ahead of time that they were going to pull it why not just keep quiet until it came down? Things aren't really adding up in my mind.


I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it, so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.





Hardly helpful m8



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Koka

Originally posted by Crakeur
anyone know where the woman was filmed from because, looking at a map of the wtc makes it kind of hard to figure out which angle this was taken from.


Post from Page 19


thanks.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Nice work Crak ..as usual



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by deltaboy
I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it, so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.


Or could it be that someone hit the "submit" button a little too early? Hardly your best garbage today delta.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Identified
I think this entire video is a classic example of how chaotic the information coming in was and how networks clamour to be the first to report something and many times get the facts wrong.


I agree. Why would someone who was part of the grand conspiracy give the BBC a press release (or whatever communication was used) that WTC7 had collapsed when it hadn't yet? It had to be a simple mistake in reporting. Someone jumped the gun.

[edit on 27-2-2007 by mecheng]



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:35 PM
link   
People, lets keep it civil, and on track.

I don't want to have to pretend to be a Mod again.......


[edit on 27-2-2007 by Koka]



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pootie


Or could it be that someone hit the "submit" button a little too early? Hardly your best garbage today delta.


I don't understand why you are even listening to me and talking trash. You suppose to have me on the ignore list. I wish you did do that. Like right now.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Koka
People, lets keep it civil, and on track.

I don't want to have to pretend to be a Mod again.......


[edit on 27-2-2007 by Koka]


sshh Koka us secret mods are secret for 1 reason.............TO BE SECRET lol



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Koka
People, lets keep it civil, and on track.

True. IMO if this CT is to continue we have to answer why would anyone give BBC some sort of press release that WTC7 has come down when it hadn't yet.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by kuhl

Originally posted by shindigger

Originally posted by deltaboy

Originally posted by mecheng


I think I'm beginning to agree with you here. If someone had knowledge ahead of time that they were going to pull it why not just keep quiet until it came down? Things aren't really adding up in my mind.


I can solve that conspiracy. BBC wanted to be the first to report on it, so the U.S. govt. decided to tell them.
BBC must have paid alot of money.





Hardly helpful m8

Righto.
I just cant get in to the psyche of someone who when they THINK theyve made a funny, or a killer point, when we are discussing the murder of 3000 people, uses a smiley emoticon to round off their contribution.
It doesnt sit well. Thats all.
I dont know if hes joking or not quite honestly.
Read his other posts. Hes convinced himself that all is well. Good for him.
Not.



posted on Feb, 27 2007 @ 03:41 PM
link   
Come on?? You are telling everyone on this board that it was a "simple mistake in reporting" Right, I think you need to be posting on the Coincidence Theory Board!! Maybe we should give up, throw in the towel, and write yet another peice of damning evidence as coincidence. I'm not buying that, the video was authentic, and somehow the BBC got word of it's collapse before it happened!!




top topics



 
101
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join