It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BBC News Reports Building 7 collapse 23 Minutes before it collapses.

page: 10
101
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:36 PM
link   
If this is an elaborate hoax to make the truth movement look bad, it's one heck of a scam.

I am going to watch the video again to see if maybe a standing building 7 was somehow imaged into the background.

Do we have any video experts here that can spot this sort of thing.

Maybe we should all watch again to make sure we aren't being tricked somehow.

Call me paranoid also.

This video seems too good to be true and that's what worries me.

[edit on 26-2-2007 by r4758]




posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:40 PM
link   
IMO, if this was just a simple miscommunication on that chaotic day itself (which seemed the most logical explanation), why are Google and the BBC going through this much trouble to censor it? It doenst even show up on googlevideo search anymore and the BBC link has been cut. all this happened today, as the news started to spread worldwide..

wouldnt it be better for their credibility to just adress this and dismiss it as a simple human error?



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xeros

Originally posted by gingerlad
The video states a 5 hour time difference (2nd reel), but the link below shows a 4 hour difference!!

www.timeanddate.com...

Can some of the ATS boffins kindly correct or explain??


The difference is 5 hours on both. On your link - New York: 5:00, London : 10:00.

[edit on 26-2-2007 by Xeros]


I set the UTC/GMT to 09:00; NY time is then 05:00.

I make that 4 hours!! Is this correct??



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:42 PM
link   
UK was still in BST (British Summer Time), not GMT (Greenwich Mean Time). However, I don't know whether the timestamp would have been in GMT or BST, given it's BBC World we're talking about.

I dunno.. maybe that could be the explaination? worth looking into.



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:42 PM
link   
So, I have the Original BBC Report from Sept 11, 2001, all 8hrs of it. NO Reporter in front of WTC7....GONE!! The whole section of her report is missing. Someone is trying to get out of this one.



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:43 PM
link   
Thanks for that!!

It has to be looked at, I totally agree!!



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:43 PM
link   
Apologies for double posting!!

mods please delete, thanks!!



[edit on 26/2/07 by gingerlad]



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:45 PM
link   
how long do files take to process on you tube. i uploaded the origional about 30mins ago and its still processing



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by gingerlad
The video states a 5 hour time difference (2nd reel), but the link below shows a 4 hour difference!!

www.timeanddate.com...

Can some of the ATS boffins kindly correct or explain??


Its called DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME!!

Summer is EDT.

Winter is EST.

EST begins in october...


wow



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I still cannot see, how if your told about something, such a big conspiracy being played on the entire world.... how'd you'd ''slipup'' the extent they have.


They're British. I live in the same country as WTC7 and I couldn't have told you which one it was. I couldn't have told you which were WTC1 and 2. It's not like everyone knew the names of the buildings there. Only New Yorkers who are familiar with them would know.

So, they were told "the Saloman Brothers Building (the 47-story WTC7) has also collapsed." Not knowing the Saloman Brothers building (or WTC7) from a hole in the ground, they reported what they'd heard, not being aware that their feed was capturing footage of WTC7 as they spoke of it being collapsed. There's a bunch of smoke and stuff, who knows what the Soloman building was? They reported what they'd heard.

By the time someone (in the know - most likely someone here in the states)
could get to the feed and shut it off, the damage was already done. The footage was recorded.

If you were reporting a plane crash in a foreign country (France) and you got word that someone important (someone you don't know, but is well-known in France) had died in the crash, you'd just report it. Unbeknownst to you, the man you're reporting dead is walking behind you and getting captured on camera. Later that night, he turns up missing.

Well, of course he's missing, he died in the crash. But he's in your video! He wasn't dead at the time of the crash!




producers, cameramen, anchors all would of been in on it, if indeed they slipped up too early.


No, no, no. They didn't know crap.



does she say building 7 has COLLAPSED, or is believed to be collapsing?


She (and the anchor and another man before the 10 o'clock news) said the "47 story Saloman Brothers building", which is the NAME of WTC7, HAS COLLAPSED.

What other building would it be? No other building collapsed at that time. You can google to find that it's the same building. No other building had 47 stories. She also mentions the Marriot as an additional building that collapsed, and it really had, But the WTC7 was still standing as she spoke of it.

They talked about it for 15 minutes as having been already collapsed.

I can't answer your other questions.



[edit on 26-2-2007 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:50 PM
link   
...and your point is what??

wow

That was in reply to spoon!! Sorry!

[edit on 26/2/07 by gingerlad]



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:52 PM
link   
Something else that has to be considered is that all of the American news reports of the wtc7 collapse are accompanied by the actual video of the building collapsing. (Well, at least the ones I have seen, anyway.)

No where in the BBC video do we see this, they simply discuss the collapse in the past tense but there is no accompanying video footage.



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:52 PM
link   
When was the original first posted online?
How long has this been available for the public to see?



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:55 PM
link   
someone on 911blogger noticed this:

on this 911 CNN archive footage, 25 minutes & 30 seconds into the clip they say building 7 "Has either collapsed or is collapsing" all while showing building 7 clearly still standing. Well over an hour before the actual collapse.
(source)

He also noticed that since a few hours, all CNN links went dead...
in the mean time, NBC4, ABC7, FOX5 and CBS9 have also removed their 911 live archive.

what exactly is going on?



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:55 PM
link   
I tell you what needs to happen, is we need to contact that news anchor women and ask how she came to state wtc collapsed



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
When was the original first posted online?
How long has this been available for the public to see?


From what I heard from the guy who made the edited video(he was on Alex Jones today), that the bbc just recently released the 9/11 video archives due to public demand, and this video was made. Now the originals seem to have been corrupted, and we NEED the guy who made this edited version to release the UNCUT, UNEDITED version...

[edit on 26-2-2007 by tator3]



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by mister Jones
someone on 911blogger noticed this:

on this 911 CNN archive footage, 25 minutes & 30 seconds into the clip they say building 7 "Has either collapsed or is collapsing" all while showing building 7 clearly still standing. Well over an hour before the actual collapse.
(source)

He also noticed that since a few hours, all CNN links went dead...
in the mean time, NBC4, ABC7, FOX5 and CBS9 have also removed their 911 live archive.

what exactly is going on?



is this NOW or on sept11 the links went dead?



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by r4758
Something else that has to be considered is that all of the American news reports of the wtc7 collapse are accompanied by the actual video of the building collapsing. (Well, at least the ones I have seen, anyway.)

No where in the BBC video do we see this, they simply discuss the collapse in the past tense but there is no accompanying video footage.



very very good point



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 09:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by gingerlad
...and your point is what??

wow

That was in reply to spoon!! Sorry!

[edit on 26/2/07 by gingerlad]


That explains why NOW, in EST there is only a GMT -4 for NYC instead of EDT for sept which is GMT -5.

wow



posted on Feb, 26 2007 @ 09:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop

Originally posted by mister Jones
someone on 911blogger noticed this:

on this 911 CNN archive footage, 25 minutes & 30 seconds into the clip they say building 7 "Has either collapsed or is collapsing" all while showing building 7 clearly still standing. Well over an hour before the actual collapse.
(source)

He also noticed that since a few hours, all CNN links went dead...
in the mean time, NBC4, ABC7, FOX5 and CBS9 have also removed their 911 live archive.

what exactly is going on?



is this NOW or on sept11 the links went dead?


today - while the story broke worldwide

please note that i have no confirmation on this, but apparently they managed to download most of it before it went off.

edit to add:
all the links can be found here.

[edit on 26/2/2007 by mister Jones]



new topics

top topics



 
101
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join